Can ChatGPT's Responses Boost Traditional Natural Language Processing?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.04648v1
• Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 15:42:05 GMT
• Title: Can ChatGPT's Responses Boost Traditional Natural Language Processing?
• Authors: Mostafa M. Amin, Erik Cambria, Bj\"orn W. Schuller
• Abstract summary: ChatGPT has shown the potential of emerging capabilities to solve problems, without being particularly trained to solve. Previous work demonstrated these emerging capabilities in affective computing tasks. We extend this by exploring if ChatGPT has novel knowledge that would enhance existing specialised models when they are fused together.
• Score: 12.456183060562317
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The employment of foundation models is steadily expanding, especially with the launch of ChatGPT and the release of other foundation models. These models have shown the potential of emerging capabilities to solve problems, without being particularly trained to solve. A previous work demonstrated these emerging capabilities in affective computing tasks; the performance quality was similar to traditional Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques, but falling short of specialised trained models, like fine-tuning of the RoBERTa language model. In this work, we extend this by exploring if ChatGPT has novel knowledge that would enhance existing specialised models when they are fused together. We achieve this by investigating the utility of verbose responses from ChatGPT about solving a downstream task, in addition to studying the utility of fusing that with existing NLP methods. The study is conducted on three affective computing problems, namely sentiment analysis, suicide tendency detection, and big-five personality assessment. The results conclude that ChatGPT has indeed novel knowledge that can improve existing NLP techniques by way of fusion, be it early or late fusion.

Related papers

• A Wide Evaluation of ChatGPT on Affective Computing Tasks [32.557383931586266]
  We study the capabilities of the ChatGPT models, namely GPT-4 and GPT-3.5, on 13 affective computing problems. We compare ChatGPT against more traditional NLP methods, such as end-to-end recurrent neural networks and transformers. The results demonstrate the emergent abilities of the ChatGPT models on a wide range of affective computing problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-26T16:10:30Z)
• Pushing the Limits of ChatGPT on NLP Tasks [79.17291002710517]
  Despite the success of ChatGPT, its performances on most NLP tasks are still well below the supervised baselines. In this work, we looked into the causes, and discovered that its subpar performance was caused by the following factors. We propose a collection of general modules to address these issues, in an attempt to push the limits of ChatGPT on NLP tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-16T09:40:05Z)
• ChatGPT Beyond English: Towards a Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models in Multilingual Learning [70.57126720079971]
  Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as the most important breakthroughs in natural language processing (NLP) This paper evaluates ChatGPT on 7 different tasks, covering 37 diverse languages with high, medium, low, and extremely low resources. Compared to the performance of previous models, our extensive experimental results demonstrate a worse performance of ChatGPT for different NLP tasks and languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-12T05:08:52Z)
• ChatGPT-Crawler: Find out if ChatGPT really knows what it's talking about [15.19126287569545]
  This research examines the responses generated by ChatGPT from different Conversational QA corpora. The study employed BERT similarity scores to compare these responses with correct answers and obtain Natural Language Inference(NLI) labels. The study identified instances where ChatGPT provided incorrect answers to questions, providing insights into areas where the model may be prone to error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T18:42:47Z)
• Consistency Analysis of ChatGPT [65.268245109828]
  This paper investigates the trustworthiness of ChatGPT and GPT-4 regarding logically consistent behaviour. Our findings suggest that while both models appear to show an enhanced language understanding and reasoning ability, they still frequently fall short of generating logically consistent predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-11T01:19:01Z)
• Will Affective Computing Emerge from Foundation Models and General AI? A First Evaluation on ChatGPT [12.456183060562317]
  ChatGPT has demonstrated competent performance across many natural language processing tasks. We evaluate the capabilities of ChatGPT to perform text classification on three affective computing problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-03T16:11:37Z)
• Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver? [113.22611481694825]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the ability to perform a variety of natural language processing (NLP) tasks zero-shot. Recently, the debut of ChatGPT has drawn a great deal of attention from the natural language processing (NLP) community. It is not yet known whether ChatGPT can serve as a generalist model that can perform many NLP tasks zero-shot.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-08T09:44:51Z)
• How would Stance Detection Techniques Evolve after the Launch of ChatGPT? [5.756359016880821]
  A new pre-trained language model chatGPT was launched on Nov 30, 2022. ChatGPT can achieve SOTA or similar performance for commonly used datasets including SemEval-2016 and P-Stance. ChatGPT has the potential to be the best AI model for stance detection tasks in NLP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-30T05:03:15Z)
• A Causal Framework to Quantify the Robustness of Mathematical Reasoning with Language Models [81.15974174627785]
  We study the behavior of language models in terms of robustness and sensitivity to direct interventions in the input space. Our analysis shows that robustness does not appear to continuously improve as a function of size, but the GPT-3 Davinci models (175B) achieve a dramatic improvement in both robustness and sensitivity compared to all other GPT variants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-21T15:12:37Z)
• Artificial Text Detection via Examining the Topology of Attention Maps [58.46367297712477]
  We propose three novel types of interpretable topological features for this task based on Topological Data Analysis (TDA) We empirically show that the features derived from the BERT model outperform count- and neural-based baselines up to 10% on three common datasets. The probing analysis of the features reveals their sensitivity to the surface and syntactic properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-10T12:13:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.