Can I say, now machines can think?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.07526v1
- Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 11:44:09 GMT
- Title: Can I say, now machines can think?
- Authors: Nitisha Aggarwal, Geetika Jain Saxena, Sanjeev Singh, Amit Pundir
- Abstract summary: We analyzed and explored the capabilities of artificial intelligence-enabled machines.
Turing Test is a critical aspect of evaluating machines' ability.
There are other aspects of intelligence too, and AI machines exhibit most of these aspects.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Generative AI techniques have opened the path for new generations of machines
in diverse domains. These machines have various capabilities for example, they
can produce images, generate answers or stories, and write codes based on the
"prompts" only provided by users. These machines are considered 'thinking
minds' because they have the ability to generate human-like responses. In this
study, we have analyzed and explored the capabilities of artificial
intelligence-enabled machines. We have revisited on Turing's concept of
thinking machines and compared it with recent technological advancements. The
objections and consequences of the thinking machines are also discussed in this
study, along with available techniques to evaluate machines' cognitive
capabilities. We have concluded that Turing Test is a critical aspect of
evaluating machines' ability. However, there are other aspects of intelligence
too, and AI machines exhibit most of these aspects.
Related papers
- Passed the Turing Test: Living in Turing Futures [0.0]
We are now living in one of many possible Turing futures where machines can pass for what they are not.
However, the learning machines that Turing imagined would pass his imitation tests were machines inspired by the natural development of the low-energy human cortex.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-11T22:56:30Z) - AI for Mathematics: A Cognitive Science Perspective [86.02346372284292]
Mathematics is one of the most powerful conceptual systems developed and used by the human species.
Rapid progress in AI, particularly propelled by advances in large language models (LLMs), has sparked renewed, widespread interest in building such systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-19T02:00:31Z) - A Review on Objective-Driven Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
Humans have an innate ability to understand context, nuances, and subtle cues in communication.
Humans possess a vast repository of common-sense knowledge that helps us make logical inferences and predictions about the world.
Machines lack this innate understanding and often struggle with making sense of situations that humans find trivial.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-20T02:07:42Z) - Brain-Inspired Computational Intelligence via Predictive Coding [89.6335791546526]
Predictive coding (PC) has shown promising performance in machine intelligence tasks.
PC can model information processing in different brain areas, can be used in cognitive control and robotics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-15T16:37:16Z) - Reliable AI: Does the Next Generation Require Quantum Computing? [71.84486326350338]
We show that digital hardware is inherently constrained in solving problems about optimization, deep learning, or differential equations.
In contrast, analog computing models, such as the Blum-Shub-Smale machine, exhibit the potential to surmount these limitations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-03T19:10:45Z) - The Human-or-Machine Matter: Turing-Inspired Reflections on an Everyday
Issue [4.309879785418976]
We sidestep the question of whether a machine can be labeled intelligent, or can be said to match human capabilities in a given context.
We first draw attention to the seemingly simpler question a person may ask themselves in an everyday interaction: Am I interacting with a human or with a machine?''
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-07T15:41:11Z) - What Images are More Memorable to Machines? [87.14558566342322]
Similar to humans, machines also tend to memorize certain kinds of images, whereas the types of images that machines and humans are different.
This work proposes the concept of machine memorability and opens a new research direction at the interface between machine memory and visual data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-14T18:48:08Z) - Inductive Biases for Deep Learning of Higher-Level Cognition [108.89281493851358]
A fascinating hypothesis is that human and animal intelligence could be explained by a few principles.
This work considers a larger list, focusing on those which concern mostly higher-level and sequential conscious processing.
The objective of clarifying these particular principles is that they could potentially help us build AI systems benefiting from humans' abilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-30T18:29:25Z) - Will we ever have Conscious Machines? [10.502211724623171]
We review the current state-of-the-art regarding machine learning approaches with respect to their potential ability to become self-aware.
For human-level intelligence, however, many additional techniques have to be discovered.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-31T12:09:50Z) - Reservoir memory machines [79.79659145328856]
We propose reservoir memory machines, which are able to solve some of the benchmark tests for Neural Turing Machines.
Our model can also be seen as an extension of echo state networks with an external memory, enabling arbitrarily long storage without interference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-12T01:45:00Z) - Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: A reality
rooted perspective [0.0]
We provide a discussion what explainable AI can be.
We do not present wishful thinking but reality grounded properties in relation to a scientific theory beyond physics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-26T15:09:45Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.