Will we ever have Conscious Machines?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.14132v1
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 12:09:50 GMT
- Title: Will we ever have Conscious Machines?
- Authors: Patrick Krauss, Andreas Maier
- Abstract summary: We review the current state-of-the-art regarding machine learning approaches with respect to their potential ability to become self-aware.
For human-level intelligence, however, many additional techniques have to be discovered.
- Score: 10.502211724623171
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The question of whether artificial beings or machines could become self-aware
or consciousness has been a philosophical question for centuries. The main
problem is that self-awareness cannot be observed from an outside perspective
and the distinction of whether something is really self-aware or merely a
clever program that pretends to do so cannot be answered without access to
accurate knowledge about the mechanism's inner workings. We review the current
state-of-the-art regarding these developments and investigate common machine
learning approaches with respect to their potential ability to become
self-aware. We realise that many important algorithmic steps towards machines
with a core consciousness have already been devised. For human-level
intelligence, however, many additional techniques have to be discovered.
Related papers
- On the consistent reasoning paradox of intelligence and optimal trust in AI: The power of 'I don't know' [79.69412622010249]
Consistent reasoning, which lies at the core of human intelligence, is the ability to handle tasks that are equivalent.
CRP asserts that consistent reasoning implies fallibility -- in particular, human-like intelligence in AI necessarily comes with human-like fallibility.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-05T10:06:53Z) - Can a Machine be Conscious? Towards Universal Criteria for Machine Consciousness [0.0]
Many concerns have been voiced about the ramifications of creating an artificial conscious entity.
This is compounded by a marked lack of consensus around what constitutes consciousness.
We propose five criteria for determining whether a machine is conscious.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-19T18:38:22Z) - Is artificial consciousness achievable? Lessons from the human brain [0.0]
We analyse the question of developing artificial consciousness from an evolutionary perspective.
We take the evolution of the human brain and its relation with consciousness as a reference model.
We propose to clearly specify what is common and what differs in AI conscious processing from full human conscious experience.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-18T12:59:44Z) - AI for Mathematics: A Cognitive Science Perspective [86.02346372284292]
Mathematics is one of the most powerful conceptual systems developed and used by the human species.
Rapid progress in AI, particularly propelled by advances in large language models (LLMs), has sparked renewed, widespread interest in building such systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-19T02:00:31Z) - Brain-Inspired Computational Intelligence via Predictive Coding [89.6335791546526]
Predictive coding (PC) has shown promising performance in machine intelligence tasks.
PC can model information processing in different brain areas, can be used in cognitive control and robotics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-15T16:37:16Z) - Can I say, now machines can think? [0.0]
We analyzed and explored the capabilities of artificial intelligence-enabled machines.
Turing Test is a critical aspect of evaluating machines' ability.
There are other aspects of intelligence too, and AI machines exhibit most of these aspects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-11T11:44:09Z) - Reliable AI: Does the Next Generation Require Quantum Computing? [71.84486326350338]
We show that digital hardware is inherently constrained in solving problems about optimization, deep learning, or differential equations.
In contrast, analog computing models, such as the Blum-Shub-Smale machine, exhibit the potential to surmount these limitations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-03T19:10:45Z) - The Human-or-Machine Matter: Turing-Inspired Reflections on an Everyday
Issue [4.309879785418976]
We sidestep the question of whether a machine can be labeled intelligent, or can be said to match human capabilities in a given context.
We first draw attention to the seemingly simpler question a person may ask themselves in an everyday interaction: Am I interacting with a human or with a machine?''
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-07T15:41:11Z) - On the independence between phenomenal consciousness and computational
intelligence [0.0]
We argue in this paper how phenomenal consciousness and, at least, computational intelligence are independent.
As phenomenal consciousness and computational intelligence are independent, this fact has critical implications for society.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-03T16:17:11Z) - Inductive Biases for Deep Learning of Higher-Level Cognition [108.89281493851358]
A fascinating hypothesis is that human and animal intelligence could be explained by a few principles.
This work considers a larger list, focusing on those which concern mostly higher-level and sequential conscious processing.
The objective of clarifying these particular principles is that they could potentially help us build AI systems benefiting from humans' abilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-30T18:29:25Z) - Dark, Beyond Deep: A Paradigm Shift to Cognitive AI with Humanlike
Common Sense [142.53911271465344]
We argue that the next generation of AI must embrace "dark" humanlike common sense for solving novel tasks.
We identify functionality, physics, intent, causality, and utility (FPICU) as the five core domains of cognitive AI with humanlike common sense.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-20T04:07:28Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.