MixupExplainer: Generalizing Explanations for Graph Neural Networks with Data Augmentation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.07832v1
• Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2023 15:46:38 GMT
• Title: MixupExplainer: Generalizing Explanations for Graph Neural Networks with Data Augmentation
• Authors: Jiaxing Zhang, Dongsheng Luo, and Hua Wei
• Abstract summary: Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have received increasing attention due to their ability to learn from graph-structured data. Post-hoc instance-level explanation methods have been proposed to understand GNN predictions. We shed light on the existence of the distribution shifting issue in existing methods, which affects explanation quality.
• Score: 6.307753856507624
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have received increasing attention due to their ability to learn from graph-structured data. However, their predictions are often not interpretable. Post-hoc instance-level explanation methods have been proposed to understand GNN predictions. These methods seek to discover substructures that explain the prediction behavior of a trained GNN. In this paper, we shed light on the existence of the distribution shifting issue in existing methods, which affects explanation quality, particularly in applications on real-life datasets with tight decision boundaries. To address this issue, we introduce a generalized Graph Information Bottleneck (GIB) form that includes a label-independent graph variable, which is equivalent to the vanilla GIB. Driven by the generalized GIB, we propose a graph mixup method, MixupExplainer, with a theoretical guarantee to resolve the distribution shifting issue. We conduct extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets to validate the effectiveness of our proposed mixup approach over existing approaches. We also provide a detailed analysis of how our proposed approach alleviates the distribution shifting issue.

Related papers

• DeCaf: A Causal Decoupling Framework for OOD Generalization on Node Classification [14.96980804513399]
  Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are susceptible to distribution shifts, creating vulnerability and security issues in critical domains. Existing methods that target learning an invariant (feature, structure)-label mapping often depend on oversimplified assumptions about the data generation process. We introduce a more realistic graph data generation model using Structural Causal Models (SCMs) We propose a casual decoupling framework, DeCaf, that independently learns unbiased feature-label and structure-label mappings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-27T00:22:18Z)
• Graph Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Causal Intervention [69.70137479660113]
  We introduce a conceptually simple yet principled approach for training robust graph neural networks (GNNs) under node-level distribution shifts. Our method resorts to a new learning objective derived from causal inference that coordinates an environment estimator and a mixture-of-expert GNN predictor. Our model can effectively enhance generalization with various types of distribution shifts and yield up to 27.4% accuracy improvement over state-of-the-arts on graph OOD generalization benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-18T07:49:22Z)
• Revealing Decurve Flows for Generalized Graph Propagation [108.80758541147418]
  This study addresses the limitations of the traditional analysis of message-passing, central to graph learning, by defining em textbfgeneralized propagation with directed and weighted graphs. We include a preliminary exploration of learned propagation patterns in datasets, a first in the field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T14:13:17Z)
• Factorized Explainer for Graph Neural Networks [7.382632811417645]
  Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have received increasing attention due to their ability to learn from graph-structured data. Post-hoc instance-level explanation methods have been proposed to understand GNN predictions. We introduce a novel factorized explanation model with theoretical performance guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-09T15:29:45Z)
• DEGREE: Decomposition Based Explanation For Graph Neural Networks [55.38873296761104]
  We propose DEGREE to provide a faithful explanation for GNN predictions. By decomposing the information generation and aggregation mechanism of GNNs, DEGREE allows tracking the contributions of specific components of the input graph to the final prediction. We also design a subgraph level interpretation algorithm to reveal complex interactions between graph nodes that are overlooked by previous methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T10:29:52Z)
• Structural Explanations for Graph Neural Networks using HSIC [21.929646888419914]
  Graph neural networks (GNNs) are a type of neural model that tackle graphical tasks in an end-to-end manner. The complicated dynamics of GNNs make it difficult to understand which parts of the graph features contribute more strongly to the predictions. In this study, a flexible model agnostic explanation method is proposed to detect significant structures in graphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-04T09:46:47Z)
• Towards Explanation for Unsupervised Graph-Level Representation Learning [108.31036962735911]
  Existing explanation methods focus on the supervised settings, eg, node classification and graph classification, while the explanation for unsupervised graph-level representation learning is still unexplored. In this paper, we advance the Information Bottleneck principle (IB) to tackle the proposed explanation problem for unsupervised graph representations, which leads to a novel principle, textitUnsupervised Subgraph Information Bottleneck (USIB) We also theoretically analyze the connection between graph representations and explanatory subgraphs on the label space, which reveals that the robustness of representations benefit the fidelity of explanatory subgraphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T02:50:15Z)
• Handling Distribution Shifts on Graphs: An Invariance Perspective [78.31180235269035]
  We formulate the OOD problem on graphs and develop a new invariant learning approach, Explore-to-Extrapolate Risk Minimization (EERM) EERM resorts to multiple context explorers that are adversarially trained to maximize the variance of risks from multiple virtual environments. We prove the validity of our method by theoretically showing its guarantee of a valid OOD solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-05T02:31:01Z)
• Generalizing Graph Neural Networks on Out-Of-Distribution Graphs [51.33152272781324]
  Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are proposed without considering the distribution shifts between training and testing graphs. In such a setting, GNNs tend to exploit subtle statistical correlations existing in the training set for predictions, even though it is a spurious correlation. We propose a general causal representation framework, called StableGNN, to eliminate the impact of spurious correlations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-20T18:57:18Z)
• Contrastive Graph Neural Network Explanation [13.234975857626749]
  Graph Neural Networks achieve remarkable results on problems with structured data but come as black-box predictors. We argue that explicability must use graphs compliant with the distribution underlying the training data. We present a novel Contrastive GNN Explanation technique following this paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-26T15:32:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.