Need-driven decision-making and prototyping for DLT: Framework and web-based tool

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.09188v1
• Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 12:19:47 GMT
• Title: Need-driven decision-making and prototyping for DLT: Framework and web-based tool
• Authors: Tomas Bueno Mom\v{c}ilovi\'c, Matthias Buchinger, Dian Balta
• Abstract summary: Multiple groups attempted to disentangle the technology from the associated hype and controversy. We develop a holistic analytical framework and open-source web tool for making evidence-based decisions.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In its 14 years, distributed ledger technology has attracted increasing attention, investments, enthusiasm, and user base. However, ongoing doubts about its usefulness and recent losses of trust in prominent cryptocurrencies have fueled deeply skeptical assessments. Multiple groups attempted to disentangle the technology from the associated hype and controversy by building workflows for rapid prototyping and informed decision-making, but their mostly isolated work leaves users only with fewer unclarities. To bridge the gaps between these contributions, we develop a holistic analytical framework and open-source web tool for making evidence-based decisions. Consisting of three stages - evaluation, elicitation, and design - the framework relies on input from the users' domain knowledge, maps their choices, and provides an output of needed technology bundles. We apply it to an example clinical use case to clarify the directions of our contribution charts for prototyping, hopefully driving the conversation towards ways to enhance further tools and approaches.

Related papers

• Data Analysis in the Era of Generative AI [56.44807642944589]
  This paper explores the potential of AI-powered tools to reshape data analysis, focusing on design considerations and challenges. We explore how the emergence of large language and multimodal models offers new opportunities to enhance various stages of data analysis workflow. We then examine human-centered design principles that facilitate intuitive interactions, build user trust, and streamline the AI-assisted analysis workflow across multiple apps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T06:31:03Z)
• Constraining Participation: Affordances of Feedback Features in Interfaces to Large Language Models [49.74265453289855]
  Large language models (LLMs) are now accessible to anyone with a computer, a web browser, and an internet connection via browser-based interfaces. This paper examines the affordances of interactive feedback features in ChatGPT's interface, analysing how they shape user input and participation in iteration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-27T13:50:37Z)
• A Survey on Personalized Content Synthesis with Diffusion Models [57.01364199734464]
  PCS aims to customize the subject of interest to specific user-defined prompts. Over the past two years, more than 150 methods have been proposed. This paper offers a comprehensive survey of PCS, with a particular focus on the diffusion models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T04:36:04Z)
• The AffectToolbox: Affect Analysis for Everyone [10.526991118781913]
  AffectToolbox is a novel software system that aims to support researchers in developing affect-sensitive studies and prototypes. The proposed system addresses the challenges posed by existing frameworks, which often require profound programming knowledge and cater primarily to power-users or skilled developers. The architecture encompasses a variety of models for emotion recognition on multiple affective channels and modalities, as well as an elaborate fusion system to merge multi-modal assessments into a unified result.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T08:55:47Z)
• Charting a Path to Efficient Onboarding: The Role of Software Visualization [49.1574468325115]
  The present study aims to explore the familiarity of managers, leaders, and developers with software visualization tools. This approach incorporated quantitative and qualitative analyses of data collected from practitioners using questionnaires and semi-structured interviews.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T21:30:45Z)
• Designing Explainable Predictive Machine Learning Artifacts: Methodology and Practical Demonstration [0.0]
  Decision-makers from companies across various industries are still largely reluctant to employ applications based on modern machine learning algorithms. We ascribe this issue to the widely held view on advanced machine learning algorithms as "black boxes" We develop a methodology which unifies methodological knowledge from design science research and predictive analytics with state-of-the-art approaches to explainable artificial intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T15:11:26Z)
• Human-centered trust framework: An HCI perspective [1.6344851071810074]
  The rationale of this work is based on the current user trust discourse of Artificial Intelligence (AI) We propose a framework to guide non-experts to unlock the full potential of user trust in AI design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-05T06:15:32Z)
• AI Explainability 360: Impact and Design [120.95633114160688]
  In 2019, we created AI Explainability 360 (Arya et al. 2020), an open source software toolkit featuring ten diverse and state-of-the-art explainability methods. This paper examines the impact of the toolkit with several case studies, statistics, and community feedback. The paper also describes the flexible design of the toolkit, examples of its use, and the significant educational material and documentation available to its users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-24T19:17:09Z)
• Incentive Mechanism Design for Resource Sharing in Collaborative Edge Learning [106.51930957941433]
  In 5G and Beyond networks, Artificial Intelligence applications are expected to be increasingly ubiquitous. This necessitates a paradigm shift from the current cloud-centric model training approach to the Edge Computing based collaborative learning scheme known as edge learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-31T12:45:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.