Settling the Sample Complexity of Online Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.13586v3
• Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 16:31:50 GMT
• Title: Settling the Sample Complexity of Online Reinforcement Learning
• Authors: Zihan Zhang, Yuxin Chen, Jason D. Lee, Simon S. Du,
• Abstract summary: We show how to achieve minimax-optimal regret without incurring any burn-in cost. We extend our theory to unveil the influences of problem-dependent quantities like the optimal value/cost and certain variances.
• Score: 92.02082223856479
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: A central issue lying at the heart of online reinforcement learning (RL) is data efficiency. While a number of recent works achieved asymptotically minimal regret in online RL, the optimality of these results is only guaranteed in a ``large-sample'' regime, imposing enormous burn-in cost in order for their algorithms to operate optimally. How to achieve minimax-optimal regret without incurring any burn-in cost has been an open problem in RL theory. We settle this problem for the context of finite-horizon inhomogeneous Markov decision processes. Specifically, we prove that a modified version of Monotonic Value Propagation (MVP), a model-based algorithm proposed by \cite{zhang2020reinforcement}, achieves a regret on the order of (modulo log factors) \begin{equation*} \min\big\{ \sqrt{SAH^3K}, \,HK \big\}, \end{equation*} where $S$ is the number of states, $A$ is the number of actions, $H$ is the planning horizon, and $K$ is the total number of episodes. This regret matches the minimax lower bound for the entire range of sample size $K\geq 1$, essentially eliminating any burn-in requirement. It also translates to a PAC sample complexity (i.e., the number of episodes needed to yield $\varepsilon$-accuracy) of $\frac{SAH^3}{\varepsilon^2}$ up to log factor, which is minimax-optimal for the full $\varepsilon$-range. Further, we extend our theory to unveil the influences of problem-dependent quantities like the optimal value/cost and certain variances. The key technical innovation lies in the development of a new regret decomposition strategy and a novel analysis paradigm to decouple complicated statistical dependency -- a long-standing challenge facing the analysis of online RL in the sample-hungry regime.

Related papers

• Bridging Distributional and Risk-sensitive Reinforcement Learning with Provable Regret Bounds [24.571530193140916]
  We consider finite episodic Markov decision processes whose objective is the entropic risk measure (EntRM) of return. We propose two novel DRL algorithms that implement optimism through two different schemes, including a model-free one and a model-based one. We prove that they both attain $tildemathcalO(fracexp(|beta| H)-1|beta|HsqrtS2AK)$ regret upper bound, where $S$, $A$, $K$, and $H$ represent the number
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-25T14:30:48Z)
• Horizon-Free and Variance-Dependent Reinforcement Learning for Latent Markov Decision Processes [62.90204655228324]
  We study regret minimization for reinforcement learning (RL) in Latent Markov Decision Processes (LMDPs) with context in hindsight. We design a novel model-based algorithmic framework which can be instantiated with both a model-optimistic and a value-optimistic solver.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-20T21:32:01Z)
• Optimistic Posterior Sampling for Reinforcement Learning with Few Samples and Tight Guarantees [43.13918072870693]
  We propose an optimistic posterior sampling algorithm for reinforcement learning (OPSRL) We guarantee a high-probability regret bound of order at most $widetildemathcalO(sqrtH3SAT)$ ignoring $textpolylog(HSAT)$ terms. Our bound matches the lower bound of order $Omega(sqrtH3SAT)$, thereby answering the open problems raised by Agrawal and Jia.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-28T20:49:34Z)
• Settling the Sample Complexity of Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning [50.5790774201146]
  offline reinforcement learning (RL) learns using pre-collected data without further exploration. Prior algorithms or analyses either suffer from suboptimal sample complexities or incur high burn-in cost to reach sample optimality. We demonstrate that the model-based (or "plug-in") approach achieves minimax-optimal sample complexity without burn-in cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T17:26:19Z)
• Breaking the Sample Complexity Barrier to Regret-Optimal Model-Free Reinforcement Learning [52.76230802067506]
  A novel model-free algorithm is proposed to minimize regret in episodic reinforcement learning. The proposed algorithm employs an em early-settled reference update rule, with the aid of two Q-learning sequences. The design principle of our early-settled variance reduction method might be of independent interest to other RL settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-09T21:13:48Z)
• Model-Based Multi-Agent RL in Zero-Sum Markov Games with Near-Optimal Sample Complexity [67.02490430380415]
  We show that model-based MARL achieves a sample complexity of $tilde O(|S||B|(gamma)-3epsilon-2)$ for finding the Nash equilibrium (NE) value up to some $epsilon$ error. We also show that such a sample bound is minimax-optimal (up to logarithmic factors) if the algorithm is reward-agnostic, where the algorithm queries state transition samples without reward knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-15T03:25:24Z)
• Breaking the Sample Size Barrier in Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model [50.38446482252857]
  This paper is concerned with the sample efficiency of reinforcement learning, assuming access to a generative model (or simulator) We first consider $gamma$-discounted infinite-horizon Markov decision processes (MDPs) with state space $mathcalS$ and action space $mathcalA$. We prove that a plain model-based planning algorithm suffices to achieve minimax-optimal sample complexity given any target accuracy level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-26T17:53:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.