Watermarking Conditional Text Generation for AI Detection: Unveiling Challenges and a Semantic-Aware Watermark Remedy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.13808v2
• Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 05:27:44 GMT
• Title: Watermarking Conditional Text Generation for AI Detection: Unveiling Challenges and a Semantic-Aware Watermark Remedy
• Authors: Yu Fu, Deyi Xiong, Yue Dong
• Abstract summary: We introduce a semantic-aware watermarking algorithm that considers the characteristics of conditional text generation and the input context. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed method yields substantial improvements across various text generation models.
• Score: 52.765898203824975
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: To mitigate potential risks associated with language models, recent AI detection research proposes incorporating watermarks into machine-generated text through random vocabulary restrictions and utilizing this information for detection. While these watermarks only induce a slight deterioration in perplexity, our empirical investigation reveals a significant detriment to the performance of conditional text generation. To address this issue, we introduce a simple yet effective semantic-aware watermarking algorithm that considers the characteristics of conditional text generation and the input context. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed method yields substantial improvements across various text generation models, including BART and Flan-T5, in tasks such as summarization and data-to-text generation while maintaining detection ability.

Related papers

• Signal Watermark on Large Language Models [28.711745671275477]
  We propose a watermarking method embedding a specific watermark into the text during its generation by Large Language Models (LLMs) This technique not only ensures the watermark's invisibility to humans but also maintains the quality and grammatical integrity of model-generated text. Our method has been empirically validated across multiple LLMs, consistently maintaining high detection accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T04:49:03Z)
• On Evaluating The Performance of Watermarked Machine-Generated Texts Under Adversarial Attacks [20.972194348901958]
  We first comb the mainstream watermarking schemes and removal attacks on machine-generated texts. We evaluate eight watermarks (five pre-text, three post-text) and twelve attacks (two pre-text, ten post-text) across 87 scenarios. Results indicate that KGW and Exponential watermarks offer high text quality and watermark retention but remain vulnerable to most attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-05T18:09:06Z)
• Token-Specific Watermarking with Enhanced Detectability and Semantic Coherence for Large Language Models [31.062753031312006]
  Large language models generate high-quality responses with potential misinformation. Watermarking is pivotal in this context, which involves embedding hidden markers in texts. We introduce a novel multi-objective optimization (MOO) approach for watermarking. Our method simultaneously achieves detectability and semantic integrity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T05:43:22Z)
• Hidding the Ghostwriters: An Adversarial Evaluation of AI-Generated Student Essay Detection [29.433764586753956]
  Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable capabilities in text generation tasks. The utilization of these models carries inherent risks, including but not limited to plagiarism, the dissemination of fake news, and issues in educational exercises. This paper aims to bridge this gap by constructing AIG-ASAP, an AI-generated student essay dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T08:11:56Z)
• I Know You Did Not Write That! A Sampling Based Watermarking Method for Identifying Machine Generated Text [0.0]
  We propose a new watermarking method to detect machine-generated texts. Our method embeds a unique pattern within the generated text. We show how watermarking affects textual quality and compare our proposed method with a state-of-the-art watermarking method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-29T20:04:57Z)
• Improving the Generation Quality of Watermarked Large Language Models via Word Importance Scoring [81.62249424226084]
  Token-level watermarking inserts watermarks in the generated texts by altering the token probability distributions. This watermarking algorithm alters the logits during generation, which can lead to a downgraded text quality. We propose to improve the quality of texts generated by a watermarked language model by Watermarking with Importance Scoring (WIS)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T08:36:00Z)
• Towards Possibilities & Impossibilities of AI-generated Text Detection: A Survey [97.33926242130732]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized the domain of natural language processing (NLP) with remarkable capabilities of generating human-like text responses. Despite these advancements, several works in the existing literature have raised serious concerns about the potential misuse of LLMs. To address these concerns, a consensus among the research community is to develop algorithmic solutions to detect AI-generated text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T18:11:32Z)
• Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defense [56.077252790310176]
  We present a paraphrase generation model (DIPPER) that can paraphrase paragraphs, condition on surrounding context, and control lexical diversity and content reordering. Using DIPPER to paraphrase text generated by three large language models (including GPT3.5-davinci-003) successfully evades several detectors, including watermarking. We introduce a simple defense that relies on retrieving semantically-similar generations and must be maintained by a language model API provider.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-23T16:29:27Z)
• Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected? [54.670136179857344]
  Unregulated use of LLMs can potentially lead to malicious consequences such as plagiarism, generating fake news, spamming, etc. Recent works attempt to tackle this problem either using certain model signatures present in the generated text outputs or by applying watermarking techniques. In this paper, we show that these detectors are not reliable in practical scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-17T17:53:19Z)
• Adversarial Watermarking Transformer: Towards Tracing Text Provenance with Data Hiding [80.3811072650087]
  We study natural language watermarking as a defense to help better mark and trace the provenance of text. We introduce the Adversarial Watermarking Transformer (AWT) with a jointly trained encoder-decoder and adversarial training. AWT is the first end-to-end model to hide data in text by automatically learning -- without ground truth -- word substitutions along with their locations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-07T11:01:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.