The World Literature Knowledge Graph
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.16659v1
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 13:41:31 GMT
- Title: The World Literature Knowledge Graph
- Authors: Marco Antonio Stranisci, Eleonora Bernasconi, Viviana Patti, Stefano
Ferilli, Miguel Ceriani, Rossana Damiano
- Abstract summary: The World Literature Knowledge Graph is a semantic resource containing 194,346 writers and 965,210 works.
The knowledge graph integrates information about the reception of literary works gathered from 3 different communities of readers.
- Score: 2.9441626898733153
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Digital media have enabled the access to unprecedented literary knowledge.
Authors, readers, and scholars are now able to discover and share an increasing
amount of information about books and their authors. However, these sources of
knowledge are fragmented and do not adequately represent non-Western writers
and their works. In this paper we present The World Literature Knowledge Graph,
a semantic resource containing 194,346 writers and 965,210 works, specifically
designed for exploring facts about literary works and authors from different
parts of the world. The knowledge graph integrates information about the
reception of literary works gathered from 3 different communities of readers,
aligned according to a single semantic model. The resource is accessible
through an online visualization platform, which can be found at the following
URL: https://literaturegraph.di.unito.it/. This platform has been rigorously
tested and validated by $3$ distinct categories of experts who have found it to
be highly beneficial for their respective work domains. These categories
include teachers, researchers in the humanities, and professionals in the
publishing industry. The feedback received from these experts confirms that
they can effectively utilize the platform to enhance their work processes and
achieve valuable outcomes.
Related papers
- Simplifying Scholarly Abstracts for Accessible Digital Libraries [7.744153396152758]
Digital libraries curate vast collections of scientific literature.
These writings are often laden with jargon and tailored for domain experts rather than the general public.
We propose fine-tuning a language model to rewrite scholarly abstracts into more comprehensible versions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-07T16:55:00Z) - A Literature Review of Literature Reviews in Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence [58.6354685593418]
This paper proposes several article-level, field-normalized, and large language model-empowered bibliometric indicators to evaluate reviews.
The newly emerging AI-generated literature reviews are also appraised.
This work offers insights into the current challenges of literature reviews and envisions future directions for their development.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-20T11:28:50Z) - The Semantic Reader Project: Augmenting Scholarly Documents through
AI-Powered Interactive Reading Interfaces [54.2590226904332]
We describe the Semantic Reader Project, a effort across multiple institutions to explore automatic creation of dynamic reading interfaces for research papers.
Ten prototype interfaces have been developed and more than 300 participants and real-world users have shown improved reading experiences.
We structure this paper around challenges scholars and the public face when reading research papers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-25T02:47:09Z) - The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform [79.4493235243312]
Semantic Scholar (S2) is an open data platform and website aimed at accelerating science by helping scholars discover and understand scientific literature.
We combine public and proprietary data sources using state-of-the-art techniques for scholarly PDF content extraction and automatic knowledge graph construction.
The graph includes advanced semantic features such as structurally parsed text, natural language summaries, and vector embeddings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-24T17:13:08Z) - The URW-KG: a Resource for Tackling the Underrepresentation of
non-Western Writers [2.983639510410386]
We present the Under-Represented Writers Knowledge Graph (URW-KG), a resource designed to explore and possibly amend this lack of representation.
The integrated information encoded in the graph allows scholars and users to be more easily exposed to non-Western literary works and authors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-21T07:53:26Z) - Using Full-Text Content to Characterize and Identify Best Seller Books [0.6442904501384817]
We consider the task of predicting whether a book will become a best seller from the standpoint of literary works.
Dissimilarly from previous approaches, we focused on the full content of books and considered visualization and classification tasks.
Our results show that it is unfeasible to predict the success of books with high accuracy using only the full content of the texts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-05T15:40:25Z) - Bridger: Toward Bursting Scientific Filter Bubbles and Boosting
Innovation via Novel Author Discovery [22.839876884227536]
Bridger is a system for facilitating discovery of scholars and their work.
We construct a faceted representation of authors using information extracted from their papers and inferred personas.
We develop an approach that locates commonalities and contrasts between scientists.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-12T11:24:23Z) - Modeling Social Readers: Novel Tools for Addressing Reception from
Online Book Reviews [0.0]
We study the readers' distillation of the main storylines in a novel using a corpus of reviews of five popular novels.
We make three important contributions to the study of infinite vocabulary networks.
We present a new sequencing algorithm, REV2SEQ, that generates a consensus sequence of events based on partial trajectories aggregated from the reviews.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-03T20:10:14Z) - How to Train Your Agent to Read and Write [52.24605794920856]
Reading and writing research papers is one of the most privileged abilities that a qualified researcher should master.
It would be fascinating if we could train an intelligent agent to help people read and summarize papers, and perhaps even discover and exploit the potential knowledge clues to write novel papers.
We propose a Deep ReAder-Writer (DRAW) network, which consists of a textitReader that can extract knowledge graphs (KGs) from input paragraphs and discover potential knowledge, a graph-to-text textitWriter that generates a novel paragraph, and a textit
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-04T12:22:04Z) - MedLatinEpi and MedLatinLit: Two Datasets for the Computational
Authorship Analysis of Medieval Latin Texts [72.16295267480838]
We present and make available MedLatinEpi and MedLatinLit, two datasets of medieval Latin texts to be used in research on computational authorship analysis.
MedLatinEpi and MedLatinLit consist of 294 and 30 curated texts, respectively, labelled by author; MedLatinEpi texts are of epistolary nature, while MedLatinLit texts consist of literary comments and treatises about various subjects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-22T14:22:47Z) - A Survey on Knowledge Graphs: Representation, Acquisition and
Applications [89.78089494738002]
We review research topics about 1) knowledge graph representation learning, 2) knowledge acquisition and completion, 3) temporal knowledge graph, and 4) knowledge-aware applications.
For knowledge acquisition, especially knowledge graph completion, embedding methods, path inference, and logical rule reasoning, are reviewed.
We explore several emerging topics, including meta learning, commonsense reasoning, and temporal knowledge graphs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-02T13:17:31Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.