Calibration in Deep Learning: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.01222v3
• Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 09:16:18 GMT
• Title: Calibration in Deep Learning: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art
• Authors: Cheng Wang,
• Abstract summary: Calibrating deep neural models plays an important role in building reliable, robust AI systems in safety-critical applications. Recent work has shown that modern neural networks that possess high predictive capability are poorly calibrated and produce unreliable model predictions.
• Score: 7.6087138685470945
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Calibrating deep neural models plays an important role in building reliable, robust AI systems in safety-critical applications. Recent work has shown that modern neural networks that possess high predictive capability are poorly calibrated and produce unreliable model predictions. Though deep learning models achieve remarkable performance on various benchmarks, the study of model calibration and reliability is relatively underexplored. Ideal deep models should have not only high predictive performance but also be well calibrated. There have been some recent advances in calibrating deep models. In this survey, we review the state-of-the-art calibration methods and their principles for performing model calibration. First, we start with the definition of model calibration and explain the root causes of model miscalibration. Then we introduce the key metrics that can measure this aspect. It is followed by a summary of calibration methods that we roughly classify into four categories: post-hoc calibration, regularization methods, uncertainty estimation, and composition methods. We also cover recent advancements in calibrating large models, particularly large language models (LLMs). Finally, we discuss some open issues, challenges, and potential directions.

Related papers

• Calibrating Large Language Models with Sample Consistency [76.23956851098598]
  We explore the potential of deriving confidence from the distribution of multiple randomly sampled model generations, via three measures of consistency. Results show that consistency-based calibration methods outperform existing post-hoc approaches. We offer practical guidance on choosing suitable consistency metrics for calibration, tailored to the characteristics of various LMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T16:15:20Z)
• On the Calibration of Large Language Models and Alignment [63.605099174744865]
  Confidence calibration serves as a crucial tool for gauging the reliability of deep models. We conduct a systematic examination of the calibration of aligned language models throughout the entire construction process. Our work sheds light on whether popular LLMs are well-calibrated and how the training process influences model calibration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T08:57:55Z)
• Calibration of Neural Networks [77.34726150561087]
  This paper presents a survey of confidence calibration problems in the context of neural networks. We analyze problem statement, calibration definitions, and different approaches to evaluation. Empirical experiments cover various datasets and models, comparing calibration methods according to different criteria.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-19T20:27:51Z)
• On Calibrating Semantic Segmentation Models: Analyses and An Algorithm [51.85289816613351]
  We study the problem of semantic segmentation calibration. Model capacity, crop size, multi-scale testing, and prediction correctness have impact on calibration. We propose a simple, unifying, and effective approach, namely selective scaling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-22T22:05:16Z)
• On the Dark Side of Calibration for Modern Neural Networks [65.83956184145477]
  We show the breakdown of expected calibration error (ECE) into predicted confidence and refinement. We highlight that regularisation based calibration only focuses on naively reducing a model's confidence. We find that many calibration approaches with the likes of label smoothing, mixup etc. lower the utility of a DNN by degrading its refinement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-17T11:04:14Z)
• Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural Networks [44.26439222399464]
  Many instances of miscalibration in modern neural networks have been reported, suggesting a trend that newer, more accurate models produce poorly calibrated predictions. We systematically relate model calibration and accuracy, and find that the most recent models, notably those not using convolutions, are among the best calibrated. We also show that model size and amount of pretraining do not fully explain these differences, suggesting that architecture is a major determinant of calibration properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-15T09:24:43Z)
• Uncertainty Quantification and Deep Ensembles [79.4957965474334]
  We show that deep-ensembles do not necessarily lead to improved calibration properties. We show that standard ensembling methods, when used in conjunction with modern techniques such as mixup regularization, can lead to less calibrated models. This text examines the interplay between three of the most simple and commonly used approaches to leverage deep learning when data is scarce.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-17T07:32:24Z)
• Quantile Regularization: Towards Implicit Calibration of Regression Models [30.872605139672086]
  We present a method for calibrating regression models based on a novel quantile regularizer defined as the cumulative KL divergence between two CDFs. We show that the proposed quantile regularizer significantly improves calibration for regression models trained using approaches, such as Dropout VI and Deep Ensembles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-28T16:53:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.