Measuring Variety, Balance, and Disparity: An Analysis of Media Coverage of the 2021 German Federal Election

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.03531v1
• Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 12:30:00 GMT
• Title: Measuring Variety, Balance, and Disparity: An Analysis of Media Coverage of the 2021 German Federal Election
• Authors: Michael F\"arber, Jannik Schwade, Adam Jatowt
• Abstract summary: We present a framework for determining diversity in news articles according to these dimensions. We provide a dataset of Google Top Stories, encompassing more than 26,000 unique headlines from more than 900 news outlets. While we observe high diversity for more general search terms, a range of search terms resulted in news articles with high diversity in two out of three dimensions.
• Score: 17.332692582748408
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Determining and measuring diversity in news articles is important for a number of reasons, including preventing filter bubbles and fueling public discourse, especially before elections. So far, the identification and analysis of diversity have been illuminated in a variety of ways, such as measuring the overlap of words or topics between news articles related to US elections. However, the question of how diversity in news articles can be measured holistically, i.e., with respect to (1) variety, (2) balance, and (3) disparity, considering individuals, parties, and topics, has not been addressed. In this paper, we present a framework for determining diversity in news articles according to these dimensions. Furthermore, we create and provide a dataset of Google Top Stories, encompassing more than 26,000 unique headlines from more than 900 news outlets collected within two weeks before and after the 2021 German federal election. While we observe high diversity for more general search terms (e.g., "election"), a range of search terms ("education," "Europe," "climate protection," "government") resulted in news articles with high diversity in two out of three dimensions. This reflects a more subjective, dedicated discussion on rather future-oriented topics.

Related papers

• Bias or Diversity? Unraveling Fine-Grained Thematic Discrepancy in U.S. News Headlines [63.52264764099532]
  We use a large dataset of 1.8 million news headlines from major U.S. media outlets spanning from 2014 to 2022. We quantify the fine-grained thematic discrepancy related to four prominent topics - domestic politics, economic issues, social issues, and foreign affairs. Our findings indicate that on domestic politics and social issues, the discrepancy can be attributed to a certain degree of media bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T03:31:37Z)
• Computational Assessment of Hyperpartisanship in News Titles [55.92100606666497]
  We first adopt a human-guided machine learning framework to develop a new dataset for hyperpartisan news title detection. Overall the Right media tends to use proportionally more hyperpartisan titles. We identify three major topics including foreign issues, political systems, and societal issues that are suggestive of hyperpartisanship in news titles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-16T05:56:58Z)
• Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption [59.55900146668931]
  We build a six-year dataset on the Italian vaccine debate and adopt a Bayesian latent space model to identify narrative and selection biases. We found a nonlinear relationship between biases and engagement, with higher engagement for extreme positions. Analysis of news consumption on Twitter reveals common audiences among news outlets with similar ideological positions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-14T18:58:42Z)
• Novelty in news search: a longitudinal study of the 2020 US elections [62.997667081978825]
  We analyze novelty, a measurement of new items that emerge in the top news search results. We find more new items emerging for election related queries compared to topical or stable queries. We argue that such imbalances affect the visibility of political candidates in news searches during electoral periods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-09T08:42:37Z)
• (Im)balance in the Representation of News? An Extensive Study on a Decade Long Dataset from India [12.472629584751509]
  We amass a huge dataset of over four million political articles from India for 8+ years. We analyze the extent and quality of coverage given to issues and political parties in the context of contemporary influential events for three leading newspapers. We find that two out of the three news outlets are more strongly clustered in their imbalance metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-27T05:33:09Z)
• Reaching the bubble may not be enough: news media role in online political polarization [58.720142291102135]
  A way of reducing polarization would be by distributing cross-partisan news among individuals with distinct political orientations. This study investigates whether this holds in the context of nationwide elections in Brazil and Canada.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-18T11:34:04Z)
• Analyzing Political Bias and Unfairness in News Articles at Different Levels of Granularity [35.19976910093135]
  The research presented in this paper addresses not only the automatic detection of bias but goes one step further in that it explores how political bias and unfairness are manifested linguistically. We utilize a new corpus of 6964 news articles with labels derived from adfontesmedia.com and develop a neural model for bias assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T22:25:00Z)
• Political audience diversity and news reliability in algorithmic ranking [54.23273310155137]
  We propose using the political diversity of a website's audience as a quality signal. Using news source reliability ratings from domain experts and web browsing data from a diverse sample of 6,890 U.S. citizens, we first show that websites with more extreme and less politically diverse audiences have lower journalistic standards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-16T02:13:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.