Proceedings Modalities in substructural logics: Applications at the interfaces of logic, language and computation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.03679v1
• Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 22:40:19 GMT
• Title: Proceedings Modalities in substructural logics: Applications at the interfaces of logic, language and computation
• Authors: Michael Moortgat (Utrecht University), Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh (UCL)
• Abstract summary: The focus of the workshop is on applications in the areas of interest to the ESSLLI community, in particular logical approaches to natural language syntax and semantics and the dynamics of reasoning. The workshop is held with the support of the Horizon 2020 MSCA-Rise project MOSAIC.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: By calling into question the implicit structural rules that are taken for granted in classical logic, substructural logics have brought to the fore new forms of reasoning with applications in many interdisciplinary areas of interest. Modalities, in the substructural setting, provide the tools to control and finetune the logical resource management. The focus of the workshop is on applications in the areas of interest to the ESSLLI community, in particular logical approaches to natural language syntax and semantics and the dynamics of reasoning. The workshop is held with the support of the Horizon 2020 MSCA-Rise project MOSAIC .

Related papers

• Logic Agent: Enhancing Validity with Logic Rule Invocation [24.815341366820753]
  Chain-of-Thought prompting has emerged as a pivotal technique for augmenting the inferential capabilities of language models during reasoning tasks. This paper introduces the Logic Agent (LA), an agent-based framework aimed at enhancing the validity of reasoning processes in Large Language Models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-28T10:02:28Z)
• An Encoding of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks into Higher-Order Logic [57.24311218570012]
  This approach allows for the computer-assisted analysis of abstract dialectical frameworks. Exemplary applications include the formal analysis and verification of meta-theoretical properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-08T09:32:26Z)
• A Principled Framework for Knowledge-enhanced Large Language Model [58.1536118111993]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are versatile, yet they often falter in tasks requiring deep and reliable reasoning. This paper introduces a rigorously designed framework for creating LLMs that effectively anchor knowledge and employ a closed-loop reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-18T18:10:02Z)
• LOGICSEG: Parsing Visual Semantics with Neural Logic Learning and Reasoning [73.98142349171552]
  LOGICSEG is a holistic visual semantic that integrates neural inductive learning and logic reasoning with both rich data and symbolic knowledge. During fuzzy logic-based continuous relaxation, logical formulae are grounded onto data and neural computational graphs, hence enabling logic-induced network training. These designs together make LOGICSEG a general and compact neural-logic machine that is readily integrated into existing segmentation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-24T05:43:19Z)
• Modeling Hierarchical Reasoning Chains by Linking Discourse Units and Key Phrases for Reading Comprehension [80.99865844249106]
  We propose a holistic graph network (HGN) which deals with context at both discourse level and word level, as the basis for logical reasoning. Specifically, node-level and type-level relations, which can be interpreted as bridges in the reasoning process, are modeled by a hierarchical interaction mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-21T07:34:27Z)
• Morpho-logic from a Topos Perspective: Application to symbolic AI [2.781492199939609]
  Modal logics have proved useful for many reasoning tasks in symbolic artificial intelligence (AI) We propose to further develop and generalize this link between mathematical morphology and modal logic from a topos perspective. We show that the modal logic is well adapted to define concrete and efficient operators for revision, merging, and abduction of new knowledge, or even spatial reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-08T21:24:25Z)
• Discourse-Aware Graph Networks for Textual Logical Reasoning [142.0097357999134]
  Passage-level logical relations represent entailment or contradiction between propositional units (e.g., a concluding sentence) We propose logic structural-constraint modeling to solve the logical reasoning QA and introduce discourse-aware graph networks (DAGNs) The networks first construct logic graphs leveraging in-line discourse connectives and generic logic theories, then learn logic representations by end-to-end evolving the logic relations with an edge-reasoning mechanism and updating the graph features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-04T14:38:49Z)
• Modeling and Automating Public Announcement Logic with Relativized Common Knowledge as a Fragment of HOL in LogiKEy [0.0]
  This article presents a semantical embedding for public announcement logic with relativized common knowledge. It enables the first-time automation of this logic with off-the-shelf theorem provers for classical higher-order logic. The work constitutes an important addition to the pluralist LogiKEy knowledge engineering methodology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-02T15:14:52Z)
• A Formalisation of Abstract Argumentation in Higher-Order Logic [77.34726150561087]
  We present an approach for representing abstract argumentation frameworks based on an encoding into classical higher-order logic. This provides a uniform framework for computer-assisted assessment of abstract argumentation frameworks using interactive and automated reasoning tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-18T10:45:59Z)
• Proceedings of the Sixteenth Workshop on Logical Frameworks and Meta-Languages: Theory and Practice [0.0]
  Design, implementation and their use in reasoning tasks have been the focus of considerable research over the last two decades. This workshop brings together designers, implementors and practitioners to discuss various aspects impinging on the structure and utility of logical frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-14T05:19:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.