Opponents and proponents of the war in Ukraine in Russian social media: who are they?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.04473v1
• Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 12:21:49 GMT
• Title: Opponents and proponents of the war in Ukraine in Russian social media: who are they?
• Authors: Alesya Sokolova
• Abstract summary: I compare the political identities, values, and interests of social media users in Russia who hold a strong position for or against the war in Ukraine. I found that proponents of the war tend to have a weaker political identity. The values of the proponents more frequently align with those promoted by the Russian government.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Understanding the personality of Russians who support the war in Ukraine is one of the key steps to understanding how this war became possible. However, during the war, traditional sociological methods are not always applicable. Social media provides an alternative source of what is inside people's heads. In this paper, I compare the political identities, values, and interests of social media users in Russia who hold a strong position for or against the war in Ukraine. I collect data from VK, the most popular Russian social media platform, and analyze self-filled profile information as well as the groups that the users subscribed to. I found that proponents of the war tend to have a weaker political identity (self-identified as "moderate") compared to opponents, who specify it more precisely (often, but not limited to, "liberal"). Additionally, the values of the proponents more frequently align with those promoted by the Russian government, such as orthodoxy and family. Despite these differences, pro-war and anti-war users share many common interests, as evidenced by their subscriptions to the same groups focused on music, history, and sport. When asked to state the most important trait in people (a field users can fill in VK), the most frequent answer for both groups is "kindness and honesty". The analysis results, in addition to contributing to the understanding of public opinion in Russia, can be utilized for predicting one's position on the war based on their social media profile.

Related papers

• Echo Chambers within the Russo-Ukrainian War: The Role of Bipartisan Users [26.643834593780007]
  We study the presence of echo chambers on Twitter related to the Russo-Ukrainian war. We identify an important subset of bipartisan users who vary their opinions during the invasion. We conclude by discussing their importance and how they can improve the quality of discourse surrounding the war.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T14:39:37Z)
• Understanding Divergent Framing of the Supreme Court Controversies: Social Media vs. News Outlets [56.67097829383139]
  We focus on the nuanced distinctions in framing of social media and traditional media outlets concerning a series of U.S. Supreme Court rulings. We observe significant polarization in the news media's treatment of affirmative action and abortion rights, whereas the topic of student loans tends to exhibit a greater degree of consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T06:40:21Z)
• Narratives of War: Ukrainian Memetic Warfare on Twitter [7.6603687980663775]
  The 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine has seen an intensification in the use of social media by governmental actors in cyber warfare. We study this prominent example of memetic warfare through the lens of its narratives, and find them to be a key component of success. Our findings present a nuanced examination of Ukraine's influence operations and of the worldwide response to it, thus contributing new insights into the evolution of socio-technical systems in times of war.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-15T12:41:03Z)
• Analyzing the Strategy of Propaganda using Inverse Reinforcement Learning: Evidence from the 2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine [21.563820572163337]
  The 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine was accompanied by a large-scale, pro-Russian propaganda campaign on social media. Here, we analyze the strategy of the Twitter community using an inverse reinforcement learning approach. We show that bots respond predominantly to pro-invasion messages, while messages indicating opposition primarily elicit responses from humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-24T13:35:18Z)
• Russia-Ukraine war: Modeling and Clustering the Sentiments Trends of Various Countries [7.717214217542406]
  This paper investigates English tweets on the Russia-Ukraine war to analyze trends reflecting users' opinions and sentiments regarding the conflict. The tweets' positive and negative sentiments are analyzed using a BERT-based model, and the time series associated with the frequency of positive and negative tweets for various countries is calculated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-02T11:32:47Z)
• Adherence to Misinformation on Social Media Through Socio-Cognitive and Group-Based Processes [79.79659145328856]
  We argue that when misinformation proliferates, this happens because the social media environment enables adherence to misinformation. We make the case that polarization and misinformation adherence are closely tied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T12:34:24Z)
• Tweets in Time of Conflict: A Public Dataset Tracking the Twitter Discourse on the War Between Ukraine and Russia [14.000779544058144]
  On February 24, 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine. In the days that followed, reports kept flooding in from layman to news anchors of a conflict quickly escalating into war. Russia faced immediate backlash and condemnation from the world at large. While the war continues to contribute to an ongoing humanitarian and refugee crisis in Ukraine, a second battlefield has emerged in the online space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-14T20:52:02Z)
• Demographic Confounding Causes Extreme Instances of Lifestyle Politics on Facebook [73.37786708074361]
  We find that the most extreme instances of lifestyle politics are those which are highly confounded by demographics such as race/ethnicity. The most liberal interests included electric cars, Planned Parenthood, and liberal satire while the most conservative interests included the Republican Party and conservative commentators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-17T16:48:00Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Information Consumption and Social Response in a Segregated Environment: the Case of Gab [74.5095691235917]
  This work provides a characterization of the interaction patterns within Gab around the COVID-19 topic. We find that there are no strong statistical differences in the social response to questionable and reliable content. Our results provide insights toward the understanding of coordinated inauthentic behavior and on the early-warning of information operation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-03T11:34:25Z)
• Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
  We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms. We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features. We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.