Demographic Confounding Causes Extreme Instances of Lifestyle Politics
on Facebook
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.06517v1
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 16:48:00 GMT
- Title: Demographic Confounding Causes Extreme Instances of Lifestyle Politics
on Facebook
- Authors: Alexander Ruch, Yujia Zhang, Michael Macy
- Abstract summary: We find that the most extreme instances of lifestyle politics are those which are highly confounded by demographics such as race/ethnicity.
The most liberal interests included electric cars, Planned Parenthood, and liberal satire while the most conservative interests included the Republican Party and conservative commentators.
- Score: 73.37786708074361
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Lifestyle politics emerge when activities that have no substantive relevance
to ideology become politically aligned and polarized. Homophily and social
influence are able generate these fault lines on their own; however, social
identities from demographics may serve as coordinating mechanisms through which
lifestyle politics are mobilized are spread. Using a dataset of 137,661,886
observations from 299,327 Facebook interests aggregated across users of
different racial/ethnic, education, age, gender, and income demographics, we
find that the most extreme instances of lifestyle politics are those which are
highly confounded by demographics such as race/ethnicity (e.g., Black artists
and performers). After adjusting political alignment for demographic effects,
lifestyle politics decreased by 27.36% toward the political "center" and
demographically confounded interests were no longer among the most polarized
interests. Instead, after demographic deconfounding, we found that the most
liberal interests included electric cars, Planned Parenthood, and liberal
satire while the most conservative interests included the Republican Party and
conservative commentators. We validate our measures of political alignment and
lifestyle politics using the General Social Survey and find similar demographic
entanglements with lifestyle politics existed before social media such as
Facebook were ubiquitous, giving us strong confidence that our results are not
due to echo chambers or filter bubbles. Likewise, since demographic
characteristics exist prior to ideological values, we argue that the
demographic confounding we observe is causally responsible for the extreme
instances of lifestyle politics that we find among the aggregated interests. We
conclude our paper by relating our results to Simpson's paradox, cultural
omnivorousness, and network autocorrelation.
Related papers
- On the Use of Proxies in Political Ad Targeting [49.61009579554272]
We show that major political advertisers circumvented mitigations by targeting proxy attributes.
Our findings have crucial implications for the ongoing discussion on the regulation of political advertising.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-18T17:15:13Z) - Navigating Multidimensional Ideologies with Reddit's Political Compass:
Economic Conflict and Social Affinity [3.850666668546735]
We analyze social interactions on Reddit under the lens of a multi-dimensional ideological framework: the political compass.
By leveraging their self-declarations, we disentangle the ideological dimensions of users into economic (left-right) and social (libertarian richness-authoritarian) axes.
We find significant homophily for interactions along the social axis of the political compass and demographic attributes.
In contrast, we uncover a significant heterophily along the economic axis: left/right interactions exceed expectations by 10%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-24T18:49:19Z) - Understanding Divergent Framing of the Supreme Court Controversies:
Social Media vs. News Outlets [56.67097829383139]
We focus on the nuanced distinctions in framing of social media and traditional media outlets concerning a series of U.S. Supreme Court rulings.
We observe significant polarization in the news media's treatment of affirmative action and abortion rights, whereas the topic of student loans tends to exhibit a greater degree of consensus.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-18T06:40:21Z) - Social media polarization reflects shifting political alliances in
Pakistan [44.99833362998488]
Spanning from 2018 to 2022, our analysis of Twitter data allows us to capture pivotal shifts and developments in Pakistan's political arena.
By examining interactions and content generated by politicians affiliated with major political parties, we reveal a consistent and active presence of politicians on Twitter.
Our analysis also uncovers significant shifts in political affiliations, including the transition of politicians to the opposition alliance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-15T00:07:48Z) - Evidence of Demographic rather than Ideological Segregation in News
Discussion on Reddit [9.875731068651561]
We evaluate homophily and heterophily among ideological and demographic groups in a typical opinion formation context.
We analyze user interactions across five years in the r/news community on Reddit.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-15T11:37:12Z) - Top Gear or Black Mirror: Inferring Political Leaning From Non-Political
Content [8.435739379764408]
Polarization and echo chambers are often studied in the context of explicitly political events such as elections.
Political polarization in non-political contexts is often unknown.
Political leaning is known to correlate with many lifestyle choices leading to stereotypes such as the "latte-drinking liberal"
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-11T06:41:23Z) - Millions of Co-purchases and Reviews Reveal the Spread of Polarization
and Lifestyle Politics across Online Markets [68.8204255655161]
We study the pervasiveness of polarization and lifestyle politics over different product segments in a diverse market.
We sample 234.6 million relations among 21.8 million market entities to find product categories that are politically relevant, aligned, and polarized.
Cultural products are 4 times more polarized than any other segment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-17T18:16:37Z) - Reaching the bubble may not be enough: news media role in online
political polarization [58.720142291102135]
A way of reducing polarization would be by distributing cross-partisan news among individuals with distinct political orientations.
This study investigates whether this holds in the context of nationwide elections in Brazil and Canada.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-18T11:34:04Z) - Political Partisanship and Anti-Science Attitudes in Online Discussions
about Covid-19 [13.996629899506353]
We analyze a large dataset of tweets related to the pandemic collected between January and May of 2020.
We develop methods to classify the ideological alignment of users along the moderacy (hardline vs moderate), political (liberal vs conservative) and science (anti-science vs pro-science) dimensions.
Contrary to expectations, we do not find that polarization grows over time; instead, we see increasing activity by moderate pro-science users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-17T08:22:20Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.