SoK: Realistic Adversarial Attacks and Defenses for Intelligent Network Intrusion Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.06819v1
• Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2023 17:23:36 GMT
• Title: SoK: Realistic Adversarial Attacks and Defenses for Intelligent Network Intrusion Detection
• Authors: Jo\~ao Vitorino, Isabel Pra\c{c}a, Eva Maia
• Abstract summary: This paper consolidates and summarizes the state-of-the-art adversarial learning approaches that can generate realistic examples. It defines the fundamental properties that are required for an adversarial example to be realistic. It provides guidelines for researchers to ensure that their future experiments are adequate for a real communication network.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Machine Learning (ML) can be incredibly valuable to automate anomaly detection and cyber-attack classification, improving the way that Network Intrusion Detection (NID) is performed. However, despite the benefits of ML models, they are highly susceptible to adversarial cyber-attack examples specifically crafted to exploit them. A wide range of adversarial attacks have been created and researchers have worked on various defense strategies to safeguard ML models, but most were not intended for the specific constraints of a communication network and its communication protocols, so they may lead to unrealistic examples in the NID domain. This Systematization of Knowledge (SoK) consolidates and summarizes the state-of-the-art adversarial learning approaches that can generate realistic examples and could be used in real ML development and deployment scenarios with real network traffic flows. This SoK also describes the open challenges regarding the use of adversarial ML in the NID domain, defines the fundamental properties that are required for an adversarial example to be realistic, and provides guidelines for researchers to ensure that their future experiments are adequate for a real communication network.

Related papers

• Analyzing Adversarial Inputs in Deep Reinforcement Learning [53.3760591018817]
  We present a comprehensive analysis of the characterization of adversarial inputs, through the lens of formal verification. We introduce a novel metric, the Adversarial Rate, to classify models based on their susceptibility to such perturbations. Our analysis empirically demonstrates how adversarial inputs can affect the safety of a given DRL system with respect to such perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T21:58:40Z)
• Untargeted White-box Adversarial Attack with Heuristic Defence Methods in Real-time Deep Learning based Network Intrusion Detection System [0.0]
  In Adversarial Machine Learning (AML), malicious actors aim to fool the Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) models to produce incorrect predictions. AML is an emerging research domain, and it has become a necessity for the in-depth study of adversarial attacks. We implement four powerful adversarial attack techniques, namely, Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM), Jacobian Saliency Map Attack (JSMA), Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) and Carlini & Wagner (C&W) in NIDS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T06:32:56Z)
• Adversarial Evasion Attacks Practicality in Networks: Testing the Impact of Dynamic Learning [1.6574413179773757]
  adversarial attacks aim to trick ML models into producing faulty predictions. adversarial attacks can compromise ML-based NIDSs. Our experiments indicate that continuous re-training, even without adversarial training, can reduce the effectiveness of adversarial attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T18:32:08Z)
• Avoid Adversarial Adaption in Federated Learning by Multi-Metric Investigations [55.2480439325792]
  Federated Learning (FL) facilitates decentralized machine learning model training, preserving data privacy, lowering communication costs, and boosting model performance through diversified data sources. FL faces vulnerabilities such as poisoning attacks, undermining model integrity with both untargeted performance degradation and targeted backdoor attacks. We define a new notion of strong adaptive adversaries, capable of adapting to multiple objectives simultaneously. MESAS is the first defense robust against strong adaptive adversaries, effective in real-world data scenarios, with an average overhead of just 24.37 seconds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T11:44:42Z)
• Adv-Bot: Realistic Adversarial Botnet Attacks against Network Intrusion Detection Systems [0.7829352305480285]
  A growing number of researchers are recently investigating the feasibility of such attacks against machine learning-based security systems. This study was to investigate the actual feasibility of adversarial attacks, specifically evasion attacks, against network-based intrusion detection systems. Our goal is to create adversarial botnet traffic that can avoid detection while still performing all of its intended malicious functionality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-12T14:01:00Z)
• Adversarial Machine Learning Threat Analysis in Open Radio Access Networks [37.23982660941893]
  The Open Radio Access Network (O-RAN) is a new, open, adaptive, and intelligent RAN architecture. In this paper, we present a systematic adversarial machine learning threat analysis for the O-RAN.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-16T17:01:38Z)
• Adversarial Machine Learning In Network Intrusion Detection Domain: A Systematic Review [0.0]
  It has been found that deep learning models are vulnerable to data instances that can mislead the model to make incorrect classification decisions. This survey explores the researches that employ different aspects of adversarial machine learning in the area of network intrusion detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-06T19:10:23Z)
• The Feasibility and Inevitability of Stealth Attacks [63.14766152741211]
  We study new adversarial perturbations that enable an attacker to gain control over decisions in generic Artificial Intelligence systems. In contrast to adversarial data modification, the attack mechanism we consider here involves alterations to the AI system itself.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-26T10:50:07Z)
• Learning and Certification under Instance-targeted Poisoning [49.55596073963654]
  We study PAC learnability and certification under instance-targeted poisoning attacks. We show that when the budget of the adversary scales sublinearly with the sample complexity, PAC learnability and certification are achievable. We empirically study the robustness of K nearest neighbour, logistic regression, multi-layer perceptron, and convolutional neural network on real data sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-18T17:48:15Z)
• Explainable Adversarial Attacks in Deep Neural Networks Using Activation Profiles [69.9674326582747]
  This paper presents a visual framework to investigate neural network models subjected to adversarial examples. We show how observing these elements can quickly pinpoint exploited areas in a model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-18T13:04:21Z)
• Increasing the Confidence of Deep Neural Networks by Coverage Analysis [71.57324258813674]
  This paper presents a lightweight monitoring architecture based on coverage paradigms to enhance the model against different unsafe inputs. Experimental results show that the proposed approach is effective in detecting both powerful adversarial examples and out-of-distribution inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-28T16:38:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.