The Efficacy of Utility Functions for Multicriteria Hospital Case-Mix
Planning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.07321v1
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 22:45:38 GMT
- Title: The Efficacy of Utility Functions for Multicriteria Hospital Case-Mix
Planning
- Authors: Robert L Burdett, Paul Corry, Prasad Yarlagadda, David Cook, Sean
Birgan
- Abstract summary: A new approach to perform hospital case-mix planning (CMP) is introduced in this article.
Our multi-criteria approach utilise utility functions (UF) to articulate the preferences and standpoint of independent decision makers regarding outputs.
Our approach may be better at identifying case mix that users want to treat and seems more capable of modelling the varying importance of different levels of output.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: A new approach to perform hospital case-mix planning (CMP) is introduced in
this article. Our multi-criteria approach utilises utility functions (UF) to
articulate the preferences and standpoint of independent decision makers
regarding outputs. The primary aim of this article is to test whether a utility
functions method (UFM) based upon the scalarization of aforesaid UF is an
appropriate quantitative technique to, i) distribute hospital resources to
different operating units, and ii) provide a better capacity allocation and
case mix. Our approach is motivated by the need to provide a method able to
evaluate the trade-off between different stakeholders and objectives of
hospitals. To the best of our knowledge, no such approach has been considered
before in the literature. As we will later show, this idea addresses various
technical limitations, weaknesses, and flaws in current CMP. The efficacy of
the aforesaid approach is tested on a case study of a large tertiary hospital.
Currently UF are not used by hospital managers, and real functions are
unavailable, hence, 14 rational options are tested. Our exploratory analysis
has provided important guidelines for the application of these UF. It indicates
that these UF provide a valuable starting point for planners, managers, and
executives of hospitals to impose their goals and aspirations. In conclusion,
our approach may be better at identifying case mix that users want to treat and
seems more capable of modelling the varying importance of different levels of
output. Apart from finding desirable case mixes to consider, the approach can
provide important insights via a sensitivity analysis of the parameters of each
UF.
Related papers
- Preference Fine-Tuning of LLMs Should Leverage Suboptimal, On-Policy Data [102.16105233826917]
Learning from preference labels plays a crucial role in fine-tuning large language models.
There are several distinct approaches for preference fine-tuning, including supervised learning, on-policy reinforcement learning (RL), and contrastive learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-22T17:20:18Z) - MedLM: Exploring Language Models for Medical Question Answering Systems [2.84801080855027]
Large Language Models (LLMs) with their advanced generative capabilities have shown promise in various NLP tasks.
This study aims to compare the performance of general and medical-specific distilled LMs for medical Q&A.
The findings will provide valuable insights into the suitability of different LMs for specific applications in the medical domain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-21T03:37:47Z) - XAI for In-hospital Mortality Prediction via Multimodal ICU Data [57.73357047856416]
We propose an efficient, explainable AI solution for predicting in-hospital mortality via multimodal ICU data.
We employ multimodal learning in our framework, which can receive heterogeneous inputs from clinical data and make decisions.
Our framework can be easily transferred to other clinical tasks, which facilitates the discovery of crucial factors in healthcare research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-29T14:28:04Z) - Interactive Hyperparameter Optimization in Multi-Objective Problems via
Preference Learning [65.51668094117802]
We propose a human-centered interactive HPO approach tailored towards multi-objective machine learning (ML)
Instead of relying on the user guessing the most suitable indicator for their needs, our approach automatically learns an appropriate indicator.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-07T09:22:05Z) - Analytical Techniques to Support Hospital Case Mix Planning [0.0]
This article introduces analytical techniques and a decision support tool to support capacity assessment and case mix planning.
An optimization model is proposed to analyse the impact of making a change to an existing case mix.
Multi-objective decision-making techniques are proposed to compare and critique competing case mix solutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-31T22:59:34Z) - Multicriteria Optimization Techniques for Understanding the Case Mix
Landscape of a Hospital [0.0]
This article considers the impact of treating different patient case mix (PCM) in a hospital.
To better understand the case mix landscape and to identify those which are optimal from a capacity utilisation perspective, an improved multicriteria optimization (MCO) approach is proposed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-31T22:55:48Z) - Improving Fairness in AI Models on Electronic Health Records: The Case
for Federated Learning Methods [0.0]
We show one possible approach to mitigate bias concerns by having healthcare institutions collaborate through a federated learning paradigm.
We propose a comprehensive FL approach with adversarial debiasing and a fair aggregation method, suitable to various fairness metrics.
Our method has achieved promising fairness performance with the lowest impact on overall discrimination performance (accuracy)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-19T02:03:49Z) - Efficient Real-world Testing of Causal Decision Making via Bayesian
Experimental Design for Contextual Optimisation [12.37745209793872]
We introduce a model-agnostic framework for gathering data to evaluate and improve contextual decision making.
Our method is used for the data-efficient evaluation of the regret of past treatment assignments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-12T01:20:11Z) - Proximal Reinforcement Learning: Efficient Off-Policy Evaluation in
Partially Observed Markov Decision Processes [65.91730154730905]
In applications of offline reinforcement learning to observational data, such as in healthcare or education, a general concern is that observed actions might be affected by unobserved factors.
Here we tackle this by considering off-policy evaluation in a partially observed Markov decision process (POMDP)
We extend the framework of proximal causal inference to our POMDP setting, providing a variety of settings where identification is made possible.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-28T17:46:14Z) - Resource Planning for Hospitals Under Special Consideration of the
COVID-19 Pandemic: Optimization and Sensitivity Analysis [87.31348761201716]
Crises like the COVID-19 pandemic pose a serious challenge to health-care institutions.
BaBSim.Hospital is a tool for capacity planning based on discrete event simulation.
We aim to investigate and optimize these parameters to improve BaBSim.Hospital.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-16T12:38:35Z) - Leveraging Expert Consistency to Improve Algorithmic Decision Support [62.61153549123407]
We explore the use of historical expert decisions as a rich source of information that can be combined with observed outcomes to narrow the construct gap.
We propose an influence function-based methodology to estimate expert consistency indirectly when each case in the data is assessed by a single expert.
Our empirical evaluation, using simulations in a clinical setting and real-world data from the child welfare domain, indicates that the proposed approach successfully narrows the construct gap.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-24T05:40:29Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.