Interpretable Online Log Analysis Using Large Language Models with Prompt Strategies

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.07610v2
• Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 02:46:11 GMT
• Title: Interpretable Online Log Analysis Using Large Language Models with Prompt Strategies
• Authors: Yilun Liu, Shimin Tao, Weibin Meng, Jingyu Wang, Wenbing Ma, Yanqing Zhao, Yuhang Chen, Hao Yang, Yanfei Jiang, Xun Chen
• Abstract summary: We propose LogPrompt, a novel interpretable log analysis approach for online scenarios. LogPrompt employs large language models (LLMs) to perform online log analysis tasks via a suite of advanced prompt strategies. LogPrompt, despite requiring no in-domain training, outperforms existing approaches trained on thousands of logs by up to 55.9%.
• Score: 25.71982260940313
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Automated log analysis is crucial in modern software-intensive systems for facilitating program comprehension throughout software maintenance and engineering life cycles. Existing methods perform tasks such as log parsing and log anomaly detection by providing a single prediction value without interpretation. However, given the increasing volume of system events, the limited interpretability of analysis results hinders analysts' comprehension of program status and their ability to take appropriate actions. Moreover, these methods require substantial in-domain training data, and their performance declines sharply (by up to 62.5%) in online scenarios involving unseen logs from new domains, a common occurrence due to rapid software updates. In this paper, we propose LogPrompt, a novel interpretable log analysis approach for online scenarios. LogPrompt employs large language models (LLMs) to perform online log analysis tasks via a suite of advanced prompt strategies tailored for log tasks, which enhances LLMs' performance by up to 380.7% compared with simple prompts. Experiments on nine publicly available evaluation datasets across two tasks demonstrate that LogPrompt, despite requiring no in-domain training, outperforms existing approaches trained on thousands of logs by up to 55.9%. We also conduct a human evaluation of LogPrompt's interpretability, with six practitioners possessing over 10 years of experience, who highly rated the generated content in terms of usefulness and readability (averagely 4.42/5). LogPrompt also exhibits remarkable compatibility with open-source and smaller-scale LLMs, making it flexible for practical deployment. Code of LogPrompt is available at https://github.com/lunyiliu/LogPrompt.

Related papers

• Studying and Benchmarking Large Language Models For Log Level Suggestion [49.176736212364496]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have become a focal point of research across various domains. This paper investigates the impact of characteristics and learning paradigms on the performance of 12 open-source LLMs in log level suggestion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T03:52:17Z)
• LogParser-LLM: Advancing Efficient Log Parsing with Large Language Models [19.657278472819588]
  We introduce Log-LLM, a novel log integrated with LLM capabilities. We address the intricate challenge of parsing granularity, proposing a new metric to allow users to calibrate granularity to their specific needs. Our method's efficacy is empirically demonstrated through evaluations on the Loghub-2k and the large-scale LogPub benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-25T05:34:24Z)
• LogEval: A Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Large Language Models In Log Analysis [32.46940506638522]
  We introduce LogEval, a benchmark suite designed to evaluate the capabilities of Large Language Models in log analysis tasks. This benchmark covers tasks such as log parsing, log anomaly detection, log fault diagnosis, and log summarization. LogEval evaluates each task using 4,000 publicly available log data entries and employs 15 different prompts for each task to ensure a thorough and fair assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T02:39:33Z)
• LogFormer: A Pre-train and Tuning Pipeline for Log Anomaly Detection [73.69399219776315]
  We propose a unified Transformer-based framework for Log anomaly detection (LogFormer) to improve the generalization ability across different domains. Specifically, our model is first pre-trained on the source domain to obtain shared semantic knowledge of log data. Then, we transfer such knowledge to the target domain via shared parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-09T12:55:21Z)
• A Large-Scale Evaluation for Log Parsing Techniques: How Far Are We? [42.56249610409624]
  We provide a new collection of annotated log datasets, denoted Loghub-2.0, which can better reflect the characteristics of log data in real-world software systems. We conduct a thorough re-evaluation of 15 state-of-the-art logs in a more rigorous and practical setting. Particularly, we introduce a new evaluation metric to mitigate the sensitivity of existing metrics to imbalanced data distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-21T16:24:15Z)
• Log Parsing Evaluation in the Era of Modern Software Systems [47.370291246632114]
  We focus on one integral part of automated log analysis, log parsing, which is the prerequisite to deriving any insights from logs. Our investigation reveals problematic aspects within the log parsing field, particularly its inefficiency in handling heterogeneous real-world logs. We propose a tool, Logchimera, that enables estimating log parsing performance in industry contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-17T14:19:22Z)
• On the Effectiveness of Log Representation for Log-based Anomaly Detection [12.980238412281471]
  This work investigates and compares the commonly adopted log representation techniques from previous log analysis research. We select six log representation techniques and evaluate them with seven ML models and four public log datasets. We also examine the impacts of the log parsing process and the different feature aggregation approaches when they are employed with log representation techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-17T02:18:59Z)
• Data-Driven Approach for Log Instruction Quality Assessment [59.04636530383049]
  There are no widely adopted guidelines on how to write log instructions with good quality properties. We identify two quality properties: 1) correct log level assignment assessing the correctness of the log level, and 2) sufficient linguistic structure assessing the minimal richness of the static text necessary for verbose event description. Our approach correctly assesses log level assignments with an accuracy of 0.88, and the sufficient linguistic structure with an F1 score of 0.99, outperforming the baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-06T07:02:23Z)
• LogLAB: Attention-Based Labeling of Log Data Anomalies via Weak Supervision [63.08516384181491]
  We present LogLAB, a novel modeling approach for automated labeling of log messages without requiring manual work by experts. Our method relies on estimated failure time windows provided by monitoring systems to produce precise labeled datasets in retrospect. Our evaluation shows that LogLAB consistently outperforms nine benchmark approaches across three different datasets and maintains an F1-score of more than 0.98 even at large failure time windows.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-02T15:16:08Z)
• Self-Supervised Log Parsing [59.04636530383049]
  Large-scale software systems generate massive volumes of semi-structured log records. Existing approaches rely on log-specifics or manual rule extraction. We propose NuLog that utilizes a self-supervised learning model and formulates the parsing task as masked language modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-17T19:25:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.