LogEval: A Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Large Language Models In Log Analysis
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.01896v1
- Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 02:39:33 GMT
- Title: LogEval: A Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Large Language Models In Log Analysis
- Authors: Tianyu Cui, Shiyu Ma, Ziang Chen, Tong Xiao, Shimin Tao, Yilun Liu, Shenglin Zhang, Duoming Lin, Changchang Liu, Yuzhe Cai, Weibin Meng, Yongqian Sun, Dan Pei,
- Abstract summary: We introduce LogEval, a benchmark suite designed to evaluate the capabilities of Large Language Models in log analysis tasks.
This benchmark covers tasks such as log parsing, log anomaly detection, log fault diagnosis, and log summarization.
LogEval evaluates each task using 4,000 publicly available log data entries and employs 15 different prompts for each task to ensure a thorough and fair assessment.
- Score: 32.46940506638522
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Log analysis is crucial for ensuring the orderly and stable operation of information systems, particularly in the field of Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOps). Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in natural language processing tasks. In the AIOps domain, they excel in tasks such as anomaly detection, root cause analysis of faults, operations and maintenance script generation, and alert information summarization. However, the performance of current LLMs in log analysis tasks remains inadequately validated. To address this gap, we introduce LogEval, a comprehensive benchmark suite designed to evaluate the capabilities of LLMs in various log analysis tasks for the first time. This benchmark covers tasks such as log parsing, log anomaly detection, log fault diagnosis, and log summarization. LogEval evaluates each task using 4,000 publicly available log data entries and employs 15 different prompts for each task to ensure a thorough and fair assessment. By rigorously evaluating leading LLMs, we demonstrate the impact of various LLM technologies on log analysis performance, focusing on aspects such as self-consistency and few-shot contextual learning. We also discuss findings related to model quantification, Chinese-English question-answering evaluation, and prompt engineering. These findings provide insights into the strengths and weaknesses of LLMs in multilingual environments and the effectiveness of different prompt strategies. Various evaluation methods are employed for different tasks to accurately measure the performance of LLMs in log analysis, ensuring a comprehensive assessment. The insights gained from LogEvals evaluation reveal the strengths and limitations of LLMs in log analysis tasks, providing valuable guidance for researchers and practitioners.
Related papers
- SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts.
We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM.
We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z) - ULog: Unsupervised Log Parsing with Large Language Models through Log Contrastive Units [34.344687402936835]
We propose ULog, an unsupervised-based method for efficient and off-the-shelf log parsing.
We refer to such groups of logs as Log Contrastive Units (LCUs)
ULog crafts a novel parsing prompt for LLMs to identify contrastive patterns and extract meaningful log structures from LCUs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-11T11:32:01Z) - Characterization of Large Language Model Development in the Datacenter [55.9909258342639]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have presented impressive performance across several transformative tasks.
However, it is non-trivial to efficiently utilize large-scale cluster resources to develop LLMs.
We present an in-depth characterization study of a six-month LLM development workload trace collected from our GPU datacenter Acme.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-12T13:31:14Z) - CLOMO: Counterfactual Logical Modification with Large Language Models [109.60793869938534]
We introduce a novel task, Counterfactual Logical Modification (CLOMO), and a high-quality human-annotated benchmark.
In this task, LLMs must adeptly alter a given argumentative text to uphold a predetermined logical relationship.
We propose an innovative evaluation metric, the Self-Evaluation Score (SES), to directly evaluate the natural language output of LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-29T08:29:54Z) - Revisit Input Perturbation Problems for LLMs: A Unified Robustness
Evaluation Framework for Noisy Slot Filling Task [18.623619585980688]
We propose a unified robustness evaluation framework based on the slot-filling task to evaluate the dialogue understanding capability of large language models.
Specifically, we construct a input perturbation evaluation dataset, Noise-LLM, which contains five types of single perturbation and four types of mixed perturbation data.
Our aim is to assess how well various robustness methods of LLMs perform in real-world noisy scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-10T10:22:05Z) - Learning Representations on Logs for AIOps [6.47086647390439]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are trained using self-supervision on a vast amount of unlabeled data.
This paper introduces a LLM for log data which is trained on public and proprietary log data.
Our proposed LLM, trained on public and proprietary log data, offers superior performance on multiple downstream tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-18T20:34:46Z) - On the Effectiveness of Log Representation for Log-based Anomaly Detection [12.980238412281471]
This work investigates and compares the commonly adopted log representation techniques from previous log analysis research.
We select six log representation techniques and evaluate them with seven ML models and four public log datasets.
We also examine the impacts of the log parsing process and the different feature aggregation approaches when they are employed with log representation techniques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-17T02:18:59Z) - Sentiment Analysis in the Era of Large Language Models: A Reality Check [69.97942065617664]
This paper investigates the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in performing various sentiment analysis tasks.
We evaluate performance across 13 tasks on 26 datasets and compare the results against small language models (SLMs) trained on domain-specific datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-24T10:45:25Z) - Exploring Self-supervised Logic-enhanced Training for Large Language Models [59.227222647741094]
In this paper, we make the first attempt to investigate the feasibility of incorporating logical knowledge through self-supervised post-training.
We devise an auto-regressive objective variant of MERIt and integrate it with two LLM series, i.e., FLAN-T5 and LLaMA, with parameter size ranging from 3 billion to 13 billion.
The results on two challenging logical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of LogicLLM.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-23T06:13:10Z) - Self-Supervised Log Parsing [59.04636530383049]
Large-scale software systems generate massive volumes of semi-structured log records.
Existing approaches rely on log-specifics or manual rule extraction.
We propose NuLog that utilizes a self-supervised learning model and formulates the parsing task as masked language modeling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-17T19:25:25Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.