LogEval: A Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Large Language Models In Log Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.01896v1
• Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 02:39:33 GMT
• Title: LogEval: A Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Large Language Models In Log Analysis
• Authors: Tianyu Cui, Shiyu Ma, Ziang Chen, Tong Xiao, Shimin Tao, Yilun Liu, Shenglin Zhang, Duoming Lin, Changchang Liu, Yuzhe Cai, Weibin Meng, Yongqian Sun, Dan Pei,
• Abstract summary: We introduce LogEval, a benchmark suite designed to evaluate the capabilities of Large Language Models in log analysis tasks. This benchmark covers tasks such as log parsing, log anomaly detection, log fault diagnosis, and log summarization. LogEval evaluates each task using 4,000 publicly available log data entries and employs 15 different prompts for each task to ensure a thorough and fair assessment.
• Score: 32.46940506638522
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Log analysis is crucial for ensuring the orderly and stable operation of information systems, particularly in the field of Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOps). Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in natural language processing tasks. In the AIOps domain, they excel in tasks such as anomaly detection, root cause analysis of faults, operations and maintenance script generation, and alert information summarization. However, the performance of current LLMs in log analysis tasks remains inadequately validated. To address this gap, we introduce LogEval, a comprehensive benchmark suite designed to evaluate the capabilities of LLMs in various log analysis tasks for the first time. This benchmark covers tasks such as log parsing, log anomaly detection, log fault diagnosis, and log summarization. LogEval evaluates each task using 4,000 publicly available log data entries and employs 15 different prompts for each task to ensure a thorough and fair assessment. By rigorously evaluating leading LLMs, we demonstrate the impact of various LLM technologies on log analysis performance, focusing on aspects such as self-consistency and few-shot contextual learning. We also discuss findings related to model quantification, Chinese-English question-answering evaluation, and prompt engineering. These findings provide insights into the strengths and weaknesses of LLMs in multilingual environments and the effectiveness of different prompt strategies. Various evaluation methods are employed for different tasks to accurately measure the performance of LLMs in log analysis, ensuring a comprehensive assessment. The insights gained from LogEvals evaluation reveal the strengths and limitations of LLMs in log analysis tasks, providing valuable guidance for researchers and practitioners.

Related papers

• SpecTool: A Benchmark for Characterizing Errors in Tool-Use LLMs [77.79172008184415]
  SpecTool is a new benchmark to identify error patterns in LLM output on tool-use tasks. We show that even the most prominent LLMs exhibit these error patterns in their outputs. Researchers can use the analysis and insights from SPECTOOL to guide their error mitigation strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-20T18:56:22Z)
• Studying and Benchmarking Large Language Models For Log Level Suggestion [49.176736212364496]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have become a focal point of research across various domains. This paper investigates the impact of characteristics and learning paradigms on the performance of 12 open-source LLMs in log level suggestion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T03:52:17Z)
• LogParser-LLM: Advancing Efficient Log Parsing with Large Language Models [19.657278472819588]
  We introduce Log-LLM, a novel log integrated with LLM capabilities. We address the intricate challenge of parsing granularity, proposing a new metric to allow users to calibrate granularity to their specific needs. Our method's efficacy is empirically demonstrated through evaluations on the Loghub-2k and the large-scale LogPub benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-25T05:34:24Z)
• SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
  Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts. We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM. We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z)
• LUNAR: Unsupervised LLM-based Log Parsing [34.344687402936835]
  We propose LUNAR, an unsupervised-based method for efficient and off-the-shelf log parsing. Our key insight is that while LLMs may struggle with direct log parsing, their performance can be significantly enhanced through comparative analysis. Experiments on large-scale public datasets demonstrate that LUNAR significantly outperforms state-of-the-art log crafts in terms of accuracy and efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T11:32:01Z)
• Characterization of Large Language Model Development in the Datacenter [55.9909258342639]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have presented impressive performance across several transformative tasks. However, it is non-trivial to efficiently utilize large-scale cluster resources to develop LLMs. We present an in-depth characterization study of a six-month LLM development workload trace collected from our GPU datacenter Acme.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T13:31:14Z)
• Learning Representations on Logs for AIOps [6.47086647390439]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are trained using self-supervision on a vast amount of unlabeled data. This paper introduces a LLM for log data which is trained on public and proprietary log data. Our proposed LLM, trained on public and proprietary log data, offers superior performance on multiple downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-18T20:34:46Z)
• On the Effectiveness of Log Representation for Log-based Anomaly Detection [12.980238412281471]
  This work investigates and compares the commonly adopted log representation techniques from previous log analysis research. We select six log representation techniques and evaluate them with seven ML models and four public log datasets. We also examine the impacts of the log parsing process and the different feature aggregation approaches when they are employed with log representation techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-17T02:18:59Z)
• Sentiment Analysis in the Era of Large Language Models: A Reality Check [69.97942065617664]
  This paper investigates the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in performing various sentiment analysis tasks. We evaluate performance across 13 tasks on 26 datasets and compare the results against small language models (SLMs) trained on domain-specific datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T10:45:25Z)
• Self-Supervised Log Parsing [59.04636530383049]
  Large-scale software systems generate massive volumes of semi-structured log records. Existing approaches rely on log-specifics or manual rule extraction. We propose NuLog that utilizes a self-supervised learning model and formulates the parsing task as masked language modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-17T19:25:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.