Better Zero-Shot Reasoning with Role-Play Prompting

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.07702v2
• Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 02:07:11 GMT
• Title: Better Zero-Shot Reasoning with Role-Play Prompting
• Authors: Aobo Kong, Shiwan Zhao, Hao Chen, Qicheng Li, Yong Qin, Ruiqi Sun, Xin Zhou, Enzhi Wang, Xiaohang Dong,
• Abstract summary: Role-play prompting consistently surpasses the standard zero-shot approach across most datasets. This highlights its potential to augment the reasoning capabilities of large language models.
• Score: 10.90357246745529
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Modern large language models (LLMs) exhibit a remarkable capacity for role-playing, enabling them to embody not only human characters but also non-human entities. This versatility allows them to simulate complex human-like interactions and behaviors within various contexts, as well as to emulate specific objects or systems. While these capabilities have enhanced user engagement and introduced novel modes of interaction, the influence of role-playing on LLMs' reasoning abilities remains underexplored. In this study, we introduce a strategically designed role-play prompting methodology and assess its performance under the zero-shot setting across twelve diverse reasoning benchmarks. Our empirical results illustrate that role-play prompting consistently surpasses the standard zero-shot approach across most datasets. Notably, in experiments conducted using ChatGPT, accuracy on AQuA rises from 53.5% to 63.8%, and on Last Letter from 23.8% to 84.2%.Upon further comparison with the Zero-Shot-CoT technique, which prompts the model to "think step by step", our study demonstrates that role-play prompting acts as a more effective trigger for the CoT process. This highlights its potential to augment the reasoning capabilities of LLMs. We release our code at https://github.com/NKU-HLT/Role-Play-Prompting.

Related papers

• Law of the Weakest Link: Cross Capabilities of Large Language Models [102.91861246827797]
  We show that Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit the "Law of the Weakest Link," where cross-capability performance is significantly constrained by the weakest component. These results highlight the under-performance of LLMs in cross-capability tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-30T05:12:01Z)
• How Well Can LLMs Echo Us? Evaluating AI Chatbots' Role-Play Ability with ECHO [55.25989137825992]
  We introduce ECHO, an evaluative framework inspired by the Turing test. This framework engages the acquaintances of the target individuals to distinguish between human and machine-generated responses. We evaluate three role-playing LLMs using ECHO, with GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 serving as foundational models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T08:00:51Z)
• uTeBC-NLP at SemEval-2024 Task 9: Can LLMs be Lateral Thinkers? [7.0546788281657875]
  We investigate how different prompting methods enhance LLMs' performance on a task to reveal their inherent power for outside-the-box thinking ability. We generate a dataset of thinking paths between riddles and options using GPT-4, validated by humans for quality. Findings indicate that compressed informative prompts enhance performance significantly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-03T05:31:59Z)
• Characteristic AI Agents via Large Language Models [40.10858767752735]
  This research focuses on investigating the performance of Large Language Models in constructing characteristic AI agents. A dataset called Character100'' is built for this benchmark, comprising the most-visited people on Wikipedia for language models to role-play. The experimental results underscore the potential directions for further improvement in the capabilities of LLMs in constructing characteristic AI agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-19T02:25:29Z)
• Large Language Models are Contrastive Reasoners [8.427805316635318]
  We show how contrastive prompting significantly improves the ability of large language models to perform complex reasoning. Experiments on various large language models show that zero-shot contrastive prompting improves performance on a range of arithmetic, commonsense, and symbolic reasoning tasks. Our method not only surpasses zero-shot CoT and few-shot CoT in most arithmetic and commonsense reasoning tasks but also can seamlessly integrate with existing prompting methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T03:15:05Z)
• CogBench: a large language model walks into a psychology lab [12.981407327149679]
  This paper introduces CogBench, a benchmark that includes ten behavioral metrics derived from seven cognitive psychology experiments. We apply CogBench to 35 large language models (LLMs) and analyze this data using statistical multilevel modeling techniques. We find that open-source models are less risk-prone than proprietary models and that fine-tuning on code does not necessarily enhance LLMs' behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T10:43:54Z)
• Large Language Models are Superpositions of All Characters: Attaining Arbitrary Role-play via Self-Alignment [62.898963074989766]
  We introduce Ditto, a self-alignment method for role-play. This method creates a role-play training set comprising 4,000 characters, surpassing the scale of currently available datasets by tenfold. We present the first comprehensive cross-supervision alignment experiment in the role-play domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-23T03:56:22Z)
• CoAnnotating: Uncertainty-Guided Work Allocation between Human and Large Language Models for Data Annotation [94.59630161324013]
  We propose CoAnnotating, a novel paradigm for Human-LLM co-annotation of unstructured texts at scale. Our empirical study shows CoAnnotating to be an effective means to allocate work from results on different datasets, with up to 21% performance improvement over random baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T08:56:49Z)
• Tool-Augmented Reward Modeling [58.381678612409]
  We propose a tool-augmented preference modeling approach, named Themis, to address limitations by empowering RMs with access to external environments. Our study delves into the integration of external tools into RMs, enabling them to interact with diverse external sources. In human evaluations, RLHF trained with Themis attains an average win rate of 32% when compared to baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T09:47:40Z)
• Text Classification via Large Language Models [63.1874290788797]
  We introduce Clue And Reasoning Prompting (CARP) to address complex linguistic phenomena involved in text classification. Remarkably, CARP yields new SOTA performances on 4 out of 5 widely-used text-classification benchmarks. More importantly, we find that CARP delivers impressive abilities on low-resource and domain-adaptation setups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-15T06:24:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.