CogBench: a large language model walks into a psychology lab
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.18225v1
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 10:43:54 GMT
- Title: CogBench: a large language model walks into a psychology lab
- Authors: Julian Coda-Forno, Marcel Binz, Jane X. Wang and Eric Schulz
- Abstract summary: This paper introduces CogBench, a benchmark that includes ten behavioral metrics derived from seven cognitive psychology experiments.
We apply CogBench to 35 large language models (LLMs) and analyze this data using statistical multilevel modeling techniques.
We find that open-source models are less risk-prone than proprietary models and that fine-tuning on code does not necessarily enhance LLMs' behavior.
- Score: 12.981407327149679
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have significantly advanced the field of
artificial intelligence. Yet, evaluating them comprehensively remains
challenging. We argue that this is partly due to the predominant focus on
performance metrics in most benchmarks. This paper introduces CogBench, a
benchmark that includes ten behavioral metrics derived from seven cognitive
psychology experiments. This novel approach offers a toolkit for phenotyping
LLMs' behavior. We apply CogBench to 35 LLMs, yielding a rich and diverse
dataset. We analyze this data using statistical multilevel modeling techniques,
accounting for the nested dependencies among fine-tuned versions of specific
LLMs. Our study highlights the crucial role of model size and reinforcement
learning from human feedback (RLHF) in improving performance and aligning with
human behavior. Interestingly, we find that open-source models are less
risk-prone than proprietary models and that fine-tuning on code does not
necessarily enhance LLMs' behavior. Finally, we explore the effects of
prompt-engineering techniques. We discover that chain-of-thought prompting
improves probabilistic reasoning, while take-a-step-back prompting fosters
model-based behaviors.
Related papers
- Do Influence Functions Work on Large Language Models? [10.463762448166714]
Influence functions aim to quantify the impact of individual training data points on a model's predictions.
We evaluate influence functions across multiple tasks and find that they consistently perform poorly in most settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-30T06:50:18Z) - SIaM: Self-Improving Code-Assisted Mathematical Reasoning of Large Language Models [54.78329741186446]
We propose a novel paradigm that uses a code-based critic model to guide steps including question-code data construction, quality control, and complementary evaluation.
Experiments across both in-domain and out-of-domain benchmarks in English and Chinese demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed paradigm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-28T06:33:03Z) - Graph-based Unsupervised Disentangled Representation Learning via Multimodal Large Language Models [42.17166746027585]
We introduce a bidirectional weighted graph-based framework to learn factorized attributes and their interrelations within complex data.
Specifically, we propose a $beta$-VAE based module to extract factors as the initial nodes of the graph.
By integrating these complementary modules, our model successfully achieves fine-grained, practical and unsupervised disentanglement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-26T15:32:21Z) - MM-SpuBench: Towards Better Understanding of Spurious Biases in Multimodal LLMs [38.93090238335506]
Spurious bias, a tendency to use spurious correlations between non-essential input attributes and target variables for predictions, has revealed a severe pitfall in deep learning models trained on single modality data.
We introduce MM-SpuBench, a comprehensive visual question-answering (VQA) benchmark designed to evaluate MLLMs' reliance on nine distinct categories of spurious correlations.
Our findings illuminate the persistence of the reliance on spurious correlations from these models and underscore the urge for new methodologies to mitigate spurious biases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-24T20:29:16Z) - Monte Carlo Tree Search Boosts Reasoning via Iterative Preference Learning [55.96599486604344]
We introduce an approach aimed at enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) through an iterative preference learning process.
We use Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to iteratively collect preference data, utilizing its look-ahead ability to break down instance-level rewards into more granular step-level signals.
The proposed algorithm employs Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to update the LLM policy using this newly generated step-level preference data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-01T11:10:24Z) - Explaining Large Language Models Decisions Using Shapley Values [1.223779595809275]
Large language models (LLMs) have opened up exciting possibilities for simulating human behavior and cognitive processes.
However, the validity of utilizing LLMs as stand-ins for human subjects remains uncertain.
This paper presents a novel approach based on Shapley values to interpret LLM behavior and quantify the relative contribution of each prompt component to the model's output.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-29T22:49:43Z) - Characterizing Truthfulness in Large Language Model Generations with
Local Intrinsic Dimension [63.330262740414646]
We study how to characterize and predict the truthfulness of texts generated from large language models (LLMs)
We suggest investigating internal activations and quantifying LLM's truthfulness using the local intrinsic dimension (LID) of model activations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-28T04:56:21Z) - Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Models [52.98743860365194]
We propose a new fine-tuning method called Self-Play fIne-tuNing (SPIN)
At the heart of SPIN lies a self-play mechanism, where the LLM refines its capability by playing against instances of itself.
This sheds light on the promise of self-play, enabling the achievement of human-level performance in LLMs without the need for expert opponents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-02T18:53:13Z) - The Truth is in There: Improving Reasoning in Language Models with
Layer-Selective Rank Reduction [22.659005954676598]
We show that it is possible to significantly improve the performance of Large Language Models by selectively removing higher-order components of their weight matrices.
This simple intervention, which we call LAyer-SElective Rank reduction (LASER), can be done on a model after training has completed.
We show extensive experiments demonstrating the generality of this finding across language models and datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-21T03:51:08Z) - Learning Objective-Specific Active Learning Strategies with Attentive
Neural Processes [72.75421975804132]
Learning Active Learning (LAL) suggests to learn the active learning strategy itself, allowing it to adapt to the given setting.
We propose a novel LAL method for classification that exploits symmetry and independence properties of the active learning problem.
Our approach is based on learning from a myopic oracle, which gives our model the ability to adapt to non-standard objectives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-11T14:16:37Z) - To Repeat or Not To Repeat: Insights from Scaling LLM under Token-Crisis [50.31589712761807]
Large language models (LLMs) are notoriously token-hungry during pre-training, and high-quality text data on the web is approaching its scaling limit for LLMs.
We investigate the consequences of repeating pre-training data, revealing that the model is susceptible to overfitting.
Second, we examine the key factors contributing to multi-epoch degradation, finding that significant factors include dataset size, model parameters, and training objectives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-22T17:02:15Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.