"Guinea Pig Trials" Utilizing GPT: A Novel Smart Agent-Based Modeling
Approach for Studying Firm Competition and Collusion
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.10974v4
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 20:15:38 GMT
- Title: "Guinea Pig Trials" Utilizing GPT: A Novel Smart Agent-Based Modeling
Approach for Studying Firm Competition and Collusion
- Authors: Xu Han, Zengqing Wu, Chuan Xiao
- Abstract summary: We propose an innovative framework called Smart Agent-Based Modeling (SABM), wherein smart agents represent firms and interact with one another.
Smart agents possess an extensive knowledge base for decision-making and exhibit human-like strategic abilities, surpassing traditional ABM agents.
Our results demonstrate that, in the absence of communication, smart agents consistently reach tacit collusion, leading to prices converging at levels higher than the Bertrand equilibrium price but lower than monopoly or cartel prices.
- Score: 10.721432974840429
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Firm competition and collusion involve complex dynamics, particularly when
considering communication among firms. Such issues can be modeled as problems
of complex systems, traditionally approached through experiments involving
human subjects or agent-based modeling methods. We propose an innovative
framework called Smart Agent-Based Modeling (SABM), wherein smart agents,
supported by GPT-4 technologies, represent firms, and interact with one
another. We conducted a controlled experiment to study firm price competition
and collusion behaviors under various conditions. SABM is more cost-effective
and flexible compared to conducting experiments with human subjects. Smart
agents possess an extensive knowledge base for decision-making and exhibit
human-like strategic abilities, surpassing traditional ABM agents. Furthermore,
smart agents can simulate human conversation and be personalized, making them
ideal for studying complex situations involving communication. Our results
demonstrate that, in the absence of communication, smart agents consistently
reach tacit collusion, leading to prices converging at levels higher than the
Bertrand equilibrium price but lower than monopoly or cartel prices. When
communication is allowed, smart agents achieve a higher-level collusion with
prices close to cartel prices. Collusion forms more quickly with communication,
while price convergence is smoother without it. These results indicate that
communication enhances trust between firms, encouraging frequent small price
deviations to explore opportunities for a higher-level win-win situation and
reducing the likelihood of triggering a price war. We also assigned different
personas to firms to analyze behavioral differences and tested variant models
under diverse market structures. The findings showcase the effectiveness and
robustness of SABM and provide intriguing insights into competition and
collusion.
Related papers
- Artificial Intelligence and Algorithmic Price Collusion in Two-sided Markets [9.053163124987535]
We examine how AI agents using Q-learning engage in tacit collusion in two-sided markets.
Our experiments reveal that AI-driven platforms achieve higher collusion levels compared to Bertrand competition.
Increased network externalities significantly enhance collusion, suggesting AI algorithms exploit them to maximize profits.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-04T17:57:56Z) - By Fair Means or Foul: Quantifying Collusion in a Market Simulation with Deep Reinforcement Learning [1.5249435285717095]
This research employs an experimental oligopoly model of repeated price competition.
We investigate the strategies and emerging pricing patterns developed by the agents, which may lead to a collusive outcome.
Our findings indicate that RL-based AI agents converge to a collusive state characterized by the charging of supracompetitive prices.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-04T15:35:08Z) - CompeteAI: Understanding the Competition Dynamics in Large Language Model-based Agents [43.46476421809271]
Large language models (LLMs) have been widely used as agents to complete different tasks.
We propose a general framework for studying the competition between agents.
We then implement a practical competitive environment using GPT-4 to simulate a virtual town.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-26T16:06:20Z) - Cooperation, Competition, and Maliciousness: LLM-Stakeholders Interactive Negotiation [52.930183136111864]
We propose using scorable negotiation to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs)
To reach an agreement, agents must have strong arithmetic, inference, exploration, and planning capabilities.
We provide procedures to create new games and increase games' difficulty to have an evolving benchmark.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-29T13:33:06Z) - ProAgent: Building Proactive Cooperative Agents with Large Language
Models [89.53040828210945]
ProAgent is a novel framework that harnesses large language models to create proactive agents.
ProAgent can analyze the present state, and infer the intentions of teammates from observations.
ProAgent exhibits a high degree of modularity and interpretability, making it easily integrated into various coordination scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-22T10:36:56Z) - Building Cooperative Embodied Agents Modularly with Large Language
Models [104.57849816689559]
We address challenging multi-agent cooperation problems with decentralized control, raw sensory observations, costly communication, and multi-objective tasks instantiated in various embodied environments.
We harness the commonsense knowledge, reasoning ability, language comprehension, and text generation prowess of LLMs and seamlessly incorporate them into a cognitive-inspired modular framework.
Our experiments on C-WAH and TDW-MAT demonstrate that CoELA driven by GPT-4 can surpass strong planning-based methods and exhibit emergent effective communication.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-05T17:59:27Z) - Many learning agents interacting with an agent-based market model [0.0]
We consider the dynamics of learning optimal execution trading agents interacting with a reactive Agent-Based Model.
The model represents a market ecology with 3-trophic levels represented by: optimal execution learning agents, minimally intelligent liquidity takers, and fast electronic liquidity providers.
We examine whether the inclusion of optimal execution agents that can learn is able to produce dynamics with the same complexity as empirical data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-13T18:15:52Z) - Finding General Equilibria in Many-Agent Economic Simulations Using Deep
Reinforcement Learning [72.23843557783533]
We show that deep reinforcement learning can discover stable solutions that are epsilon-Nash equilibria for a meta-game over agent types.
Our approach is more flexible and does not need unrealistic assumptions, e.g., market clearing.
We demonstrate our approach in real-business-cycle models, a representative family of DGE models, with 100 worker-consumers, 10 firms, and a government who taxes and redistributes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-03T17:00:17Z) - A mechanism of Individualistic Indirect Reciprocity with internal and
external dynamics [0.0]
This research proposes a new variant of Nowak and Sigmund model, focused on agents' attitude.
Using Agent-Based Model and a Data Science method, we show on simulation results that the discriminatory stance of the agents prevails in most cases.
The results also show that when the reputation of others is unknown, with a high obstinacy and high cooperation demand, a heterogeneous society is obtained.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-28T23:28:50Z) - Moody Learners -- Explaining Competitive Behaviour of Reinforcement
Learning Agents [65.2200847818153]
In a competitive scenario, the agent does not only have a dynamic environment but also is directly affected by the opponents' actions.
Observing the Q-values of the agent is usually a way of explaining its behavior, however, do not show the temporal-relation between the selected actions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-30T11:30:42Z) - On Emergent Communication in Competitive Multi-Agent Teams [116.95067289206919]
We investigate whether competition for performance from an external, similar agent team could act as a social influence.
Our results show that an external competitive influence leads to improved accuracy and generalization, as well as faster emergence of communicative languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-04T01:14:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.