Leveraging Explainable AI to Analyze Researchers' Aspect-Based Sentiment about ChatGPT

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.11001v1
• Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 07:44:06 GMT
• Title: Leveraging Explainable AI to Analyze Researchers' Aspect-Based Sentiment about ChatGPT
• Authors: Shilpa Lakhanpal, Ajay Gupta, Rajeev Agrawal
• Abstract summary: We propose a methodology that uses Explainable AI to facilitate such analysis on research data. Our technique presents valuable insights into extending the state of the art of Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis on newer datasets.
• Score: 3.3340659845424536
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: The groundbreaking invention of ChatGPT has triggered enormous discussion among users across all fields and domains. Among celebration around its various advantages, questions have been raised with regards to its correctness and ethics of its use. Efforts are already underway towards capturing user sentiments around it. But it begs the question as to how the research community is analyzing ChatGPT with regards to various aspects of its usage. It is this sentiment of the researchers that we analyze in our work. Since Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis has usually only been applied on a few datasets, it gives limited success and that too only on short text data. We propose a methodology that uses Explainable AI to facilitate such analysis on research data. Our technique presents valuable insights into extending the state of the art of Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis on newer datasets, where such analysis is not hampered by the length of the text data.

Related papers

• Decoding AI: The inside story of data analysis in ChatGPT [0.0]
  This review critically examines the Data Analysis capabilities of ChatGPT assessing its performance across a wide range of tasks. While DA provides researchers and practitioners with unprecedented analytical capabilities, it is far from being perfect, and it is important to recognize and address its limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-12T13:57:30Z)
• What Evidence Do Language Models Find Convincing? [94.90663008214918]
  We build a dataset that pairs controversial queries with a series of real-world evidence documents that contain different facts. We use this dataset to perform sensitivity and counterfactual analyses to explore which text features most affect LLM predictions. Overall, we find that current models rely heavily on the relevance of a website to the query, while largely ignoring stylistic features that humans find important.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T02:15:34Z)
• The Role of ChatGPT in Democratizing Data Science: An Exploration of AI-facilitated Data Analysis in Telematics [0.0]
  This paper posits ChatGPT as a pivotal bridge, drastically lowering the steep learning curve associated with complex data analysis. By generating intuitive data narratives and offering real-time assistance, ChatGPT democratizes the field. The paper delves into challenges presented by such AI, from potential biases in analysis to ChatGPT's limited reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-26T18:59:23Z)
• Leveraging ChatGPT As Text Annotation Tool For Sentiment Analysis [6.596002578395151]
  ChatGPT is a new product of OpenAI and has emerged as the most popular AI product. This study explores the use of ChatGPT as a tool for data labeling for different sentiment analysis tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-18T12:20:42Z)
• Is GPT-4 a Good Data Analyst? [67.35956981748699]
  We consider GPT-4 as a data analyst to perform end-to-end data analysis with databases from a wide range of domains. We design several task-specific evaluation metrics to systematically compare the performance between several professional human data analysts and GPT-4. Experimental results show that GPT-4 can achieve comparable performance to humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T11:26:59Z)
• Uncovering the Potential of ChatGPT for Discourse Analysis in Dialogue: An Empirical Study [51.079100495163736]
  This paper systematically inspects ChatGPT's performance in two discourse analysis tasks: topic segmentation and discourse parsing. ChatGPT demonstrates proficiency in identifying topic structures in general-domain conversations yet struggles considerably in specific-domain conversations. Our deeper investigation indicates that ChatGPT can give more reasonable topic structures than human annotations but only linearly parses the hierarchical rhetorical structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-15T07:14:41Z)
• Can ChatGPT Reproduce Human-Generated Labels? A Study of Social Computing Tasks [9.740764281808588]
  ChatGPT has the potential to reproduce human-generated label annotations in social computing tasks. We relabel five datasets covering stance detection (2x), sentiment analysis, hate speech, and bot detection. Our results highlight that ChatGPT does have the potential to handle these data annotation tasks, although a number of challenges remain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-20T08:08:12Z)
• To ChatGPT, or not to ChatGPT: That is the question! [78.407861566006]
  This study provides a comprehensive and contemporary assessment of the most recent techniques in ChatGPT detection. We have curated a benchmark dataset consisting of prompts from ChatGPT and humans, including diverse questions from medical, open Q&A, and finance domains. Our evaluation results demonstrate that none of the existing methods can effectively detect ChatGPT-generated content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T03:04:28Z)
• Urdu Speech and Text Based Sentiment Analyzer [1.4630964945453113]
  This work presented a new multi-class Urdu dataset based on user evaluations. Our proposed dataset includes 10,000 reviews that have been carefully classified into two categories by human experts: positive, negative. Five different lexicon- and rule-based algorithms including Naivebayes, Stanza, Textblob, Vader, and Flair are employed and the experimental results show that Flair with an accuracy of 70% outperforms other tested algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-19T10:11:22Z)
• Weakly-Supervised Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis via Joint Aspect-Sentiment Topic Embedding [71.2260967797055]
  We propose a weakly-supervised approach for aspect-based sentiment analysis. We learn sentiment, aspect> joint topic embeddings in the word embedding space. We then use neural models to generalize the word-level discriminative information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-13T21:33:24Z)
• Survey on Visual Sentiment Analysis [87.20223213370004]
  This paper reviews pertinent publications and tries to present an exhaustive overview of the field of Visual Sentiment Analysis. The paper also describes principles of design of general Visual Sentiment Analysis systems from three main points of view. A formalization of the problem is discussed, considering different levels of granularity, as well as the components that can affect the sentiment toward an image in different ways.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-24T10:15:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.