Decoding AI: The inside story of data analysis in ChatGPT
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.08480v1
- Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 13:57:30 GMT
- Title: Decoding AI: The inside story of data analysis in ChatGPT
- Authors: Ozan Evkaya, Miguel de Carvalho,
- Abstract summary: This review critically examines the Data Analysis capabilities of ChatGPT assessing its performance across a wide range of tasks.
While DA provides researchers and practitioners with unprecedented analytical capabilities, it is far from being perfect, and it is important to recognize and address its limitations.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: As a result of recent advancements in generative AI, the field of Data Science is prone to various changes. This review critically examines the Data Analysis (DA) capabilities of ChatGPT assessing its performance across a wide range of tasks. While DA provides researchers and practitioners with unprecedented analytical capabilities, it is far from being perfect, and it is important to recognize and address its limitations.
Related papers
- Data Analysis in the Era of Generative AI [56.44807642944589]
This paper explores the potential of AI-powered tools to reshape data analysis, focusing on design considerations and challenges.
We explore how the emergence of large language and multimodal models offers new opportunities to enhance various stages of data analysis workflow.
We then examine human-centered design principles that facilitate intuitive interactions, build user trust, and streamline the AI-assisted analysis workflow across multiple apps.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-27T06:31:03Z) - Benchmarking Data Science Agents [11.582116078653968]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as promising aids as data science agents, assisting humans in data analysis and processing.
Yet their practical efficacy remains constrained by the varied demands of real-world applications and complicated analytical process.
We introduce DSEval -- a novel evaluation paradigm, as well as a series of innovative benchmarks tailored for assessing the performance of these agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-27T03:03:06Z) - Assessing the Promise and Pitfalls of ChatGPT for Automated Code
Generation [2.0400340435492272]
This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of the code generation capabilities of ChatGPT, a prominent large language model.
A dataset of 131 code-generation prompts across 5 categories was curated to enable robust analysis.
Code solutions were generated by both ChatGPT and humans for all prompts, resulting in 262 code samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-05T12:56:40Z) - On Responsible Machine Learning Datasets with Fairness, Privacy, and Regulatory Norms [56.119374302685934]
There have been severe concerns over the trustworthiness of AI technologies.
Machine and deep learning algorithms depend heavily on the data used during their development.
We propose a framework to evaluate the datasets through a responsible rubric.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-24T14:01:53Z) - Leveraging Explainable AI to Analyze Researchers' Aspect-Based Sentiment
about ChatGPT [3.3340659845424536]
We propose a methodology that uses Explainable AI to facilitate such analysis on research data.
Our technique presents valuable insights into extending the state of the art of Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis on newer datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-16T07:44:06Z) - The Role of ChatGPT in Democratizing Data Science: An Exploration of
AI-facilitated Data Analysis in Telematics [0.0]
This paper posits ChatGPT as a pivotal bridge, drastically lowering the steep learning curve associated with complex data analysis.
By generating intuitive data narratives and offering real-time assistance, ChatGPT democratizes the field.
The paper delves into challenges presented by such AI, from potential biases in analysis to ChatGPT's limited reasoning capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-26T18:59:23Z) - Is GPT-4 a Good Data Analyst? [67.35956981748699]
We consider GPT-4 as a data analyst to perform end-to-end data analysis with databases from a wide range of domains.
We design several task-specific evaluation metrics to systematically compare the performance between several professional human data analysts and GPT-4.
Experimental results show that GPT-4 can achieve comparable performance to humans.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-24T11:26:59Z) - To ChatGPT, or not to ChatGPT: That is the question! [78.407861566006]
This study provides a comprehensive and contemporary assessment of the most recent techniques in ChatGPT detection.
We have curated a benchmark dataset consisting of prompts from ChatGPT and humans, including diverse questions from medical, open Q&A, and finance domains.
Our evaluation results demonstrate that none of the existing methods can effectively detect ChatGPT-generated content.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-04T03:04:28Z) - Data-centric Artificial Intelligence: A Survey [47.24049907785989]
Recently, the role of data in AI has been significantly magnified, giving rise to the emerging concept of data-centric AI.
In this survey, we discuss the necessity of data-centric AI, followed by a holistic view of three general data-centric goals.
We believe this is the first comprehensive survey that provides a global view of a spectrum of tasks across various stages of the data lifecycle.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-17T17:44:56Z) - Advanced Data Augmentation Approaches: A Comprehensive Survey and Future
directions [57.30984060215482]
We provide a background of data augmentation, a novel and comprehensive taxonomy of reviewed data augmentation techniques, and the strengths and weaknesses (wherever possible) of each technique.
We also provide comprehensive results of the data augmentation effect on three popular computer vision tasks, such as image classification, object detection and semantic segmentation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-07T11:37:32Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.