AIxArtist: A First-Person Tale of Interacting with Artificial Intelligence to Escape Creative Block

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.11424v1
• Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 13:15:29 GMT
• Title: AIxArtist: A First-Person Tale of Interacting with Artificial Intelligence to Escape Creative Block
• Authors: Makayla Lewis
• Abstract summary: The future of the arts and artificial intelligence (AI) is promising as technology advances. This workshop pictorial puts forward first-person research that shares interactions between an HCI researcher and AI. The paper explores two questions: How can AI support artists' creativity, and what does it mean to be explainable in this context.
• Score: 20.96181205379132
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The future of the arts and artificial intelligence (AI) is promising as technology advances. As the use of AI in design becomes more widespread, art practice may not be a human-only art form and could instead become a digitally integrated experience. With enhanced creativity and collaboration, arts and AI could work together towards creating artistic outputs that are visually appealing and meet the needs of the artist and viewer. While it is uncertain how far the integration will go, arts and AI will likely influence one another. This workshop pictorial puts forward first-person research that shares interactions between an HCI researcher and AI as they try to escape the creative block. The pictorial paper explores two questions: How can AI support artists' creativity, and what does it mean to be explainable in this context? HIs, ChatGPT and Midjourney were engaged; the result was a series of reflections that require further discussion and explorations in the XAIxArts community: Transparency of attribution, the creation process, ethics of asking, and inspiration vs copying.

Related papers

• Foregrounding Artist Opinions: A Survey Study on Transparency, Ownership, and Fairness in AI Generative Art [0.0]
  Generative AI tools are used to create art-like outputs and sometimes aid in the creative process. We surveyed 459 artists to investigate tension between artists' opinions on Generative AI art's potential utility and harm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-27T20:22:46Z)
• Can AI Be as Creative as Humans? [84.43873277557852]
  We prove in theory that AI can be as creative as humans under the condition that it can properly fit the data generated by human creators. The debate on AI's creativity is reduced into the question of its ability to fit a sufficient amount of data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-03T08:49:12Z)
• Studying Artist Sentiments around AI-generated Artwork [25.02527831382343]
  We interviewed 7 artists and analyzed public posts from artists on social media platforms Reddit, Twitter and Artstation. We report artists' main concerns and hopes around AI-generated artwork, informing a way forward for inclusive development of these tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T22:44:02Z)
• Beyond Reality: The Pivotal Role of Generative AI in the Metaverse [98.1561456565877]
  This paper offers a comprehensive exploration of how generative AI technologies are shaping the Metaverse. We delve into the applications of text generation models like ChatGPT and GPT-3, which are enhancing conversational interfaces with AI-generated characters. We also examine the potential of 3D model generation technologies like Point-E and Lumirithmic in creating realistic virtual objects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-28T05:44:20Z)
• Inspire creativity with ORIBA: Transform Artists' Original Characters into Chatbots through Large Language Model [4.984601297028257]
  This research delves into the intersection of illustration art and artificial intelligence (AI) By examining the impact of AI on the creative process and the boundaries of authorship, we aim to enhance human-AI interactions in creative fields.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-16T11:25:44Z)
• Agency and legibility for artists through Experiential AI [12.941266914933454]
  Experiential AI is an emerging research field that addresses the challenge of making AI tangible and explicit. We report on an empirical case study of an experiential AI system designed for creative data exploration. We discuss how experiential AI can increase legibility and agency for artists.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-04T11:00:07Z)
• Pathway to Future Symbiotic Creativity [76.20798455931603]
  We propose a classification of the creative system with a hierarchy of 5 classes, showing the pathway of creativity evolving from a mimic-human artist to a Machine artist in its own right. In art creation, it is necessary for machines to understand humans' mental states, including desires, appreciation, and emotions, humans also need to understand machines' creative capabilities and limitations. We propose a novel framework for building future Machine artists, which comes with the philosophy that a human-compatible AI system should be based on the "human-in-the-loop" principle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-18T15:12:02Z)
• Artificial Intelligence for the Metaverse: A Survey [66.57225253532748]
  We first deliver a preliminary of AI, including machine learning algorithms and deep learning architectures, and its role in the metaverse. We then convey a comprehensive investigation of AI-based methods concerning six technical aspects that have potentials for the metaverse. Several AI-aided applications, such as healthcare, manufacturing, smart cities, and gaming, are studied to be deployed in the virtual worlds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-15T03:34:56Z)
• A User-Centred Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Human-Robot Interaction [70.11080854486953]
  We propose a user-centred framework for XAI that focuses on its social-interactive aspect. The framework aims to provide a structure for interactive XAI solutions thought for non-expert users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-27T09:56:23Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• The Work of Art in an Age of Mechanical Generation [0.0]
  Can we define what it means to be "creative," and if so, can our definition drive artificial intelligence systems to feats of creativity indistinguishable from human efforts? This article considers the ability of AI to detect forgeries of renowned paintings and, in so doing, somehow reveal the quiddity of a work of art.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-27T18:32:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.