Learning Representations on Logs for AIOps

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.11526v1
• Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 20:34:46 GMT
• Title: Learning Representations on Logs for AIOps
• Authors: Pranjal Gupta and Harshit Kumar and Debanjana Kar and Karan Bhukar and Pooja Aggarwal and Prateeti Mohapatra
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) are trained using self-supervision on a vast amount of unlabeled data. This paper introduces a LLM for log data which is trained on public and proprietary log data. Our proposed LLM, trained on public and proprietary log data, offers superior performance on multiple downstream tasks.
• Score: 6.47086647390439
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: AI for IT Operations (AIOps) is a powerful platform that Site Reliability Engineers (SREs) use to automate and streamline operational workflows with minimal human intervention. Automated log analysis is a critical task in AIOps as it provides key insights for SREs to identify and address ongoing faults. Tasks such as log format detection, log classification, and log parsing are key components of automated log analysis. Most of these tasks require supervised learning; however, there are multiple challenges due to limited labelled log data and the diverse nature of log data. Large Language Models (LLMs) such as BERT and GPT3 are trained using self-supervision on a vast amount of unlabeled data. These models provide generalized representations that can be effectively used for various downstream tasks with limited labelled data. Motivated by the success of LLMs in specific domains like science and biology, this paper introduces a LLM for log data which is trained on public and proprietary log data. The results of our experiments demonstrate that the proposed LLM outperforms existing models on multiple downstream tasks. In summary, AIOps powered by LLMs offers an efficient and effective solution for automating log analysis tasks and enabling SREs to focus on higher-level tasks. Our proposed LLM, trained on public and proprietary log data, offers superior performance on multiple downstream tasks, making it a valuable addition to the AIOps platform.

Related papers

• LogLM: From Task-based to Instruction-based Automated Log Analysis [22.44842963552044]
  Existing approaches mostly treat log analysis as training a model to perform an isolated task. We propose an instruction-based training approach that transforms log-label pairs into a unified format of instruction-response pairs. Our trained model, LogLM, can follow complex user instructions and generalize better across different tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-12T03:36:52Z)
• Studying and Benchmarking Large Language Models For Log Level Suggestion [49.176736212364496]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have become a focal point of research across various domains. This paper investigates the impact of characteristics and learning paradigms on the performance of 12 open-source LLMs in log level suggestion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T03:52:17Z)
• LogParser-LLM: Advancing Efficient Log Parsing with Large Language Models [19.657278472819588]
  We introduce Log-LLM, a novel log integrated with LLM capabilities. We address the intricate challenge of parsing granularity, proposing a new metric to allow users to calibrate granularity to their specific needs. Our method's efficacy is empirically demonstrated through evaluations on the Loghub-2k and the large-scale LogPub benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-25T05:34:24Z)
• SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
  Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts. We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM. We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z)
• LogEval: A Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Large Language Models In Log Analysis [32.46940506638522]
  We introduce LogEval, a benchmark suite designed to evaluate the capabilities of Large Language Models in log analysis tasks. This benchmark covers tasks such as log parsing, log anomaly detection, log fault diagnosis, and log summarization. LogEval evaluates each task using 4,000 publicly available log data entries and employs 15 different prompts for each task to ensure a thorough and fair assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T02:39:33Z)
• LUNAR: Unsupervised LLM-based Log Parsing [34.344687402936835]
  We propose LUNAR, an unsupervised-based method for efficient and off-the-shelf log parsing. Our key insight is that while LLMs may struggle with direct log parsing, their performance can be significantly enhanced through comparative analysis. Experiments on large-scale public datasets demonstrate that LUNAR significantly outperforms state-of-the-art log crafts in terms of accuracy and efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T11:32:01Z)
• Are you still on track!? Catching LLM Task Drift with Activations [55.75645403965326]
  Task drift allows attackers to exfiltrate data or influence the LLM's output for other users. We show that a simple linear classifier can detect drift with near-perfect ROC AUC on an out-of-distribution test set. We observe that this approach generalizes surprisingly well to unseen task domains, such as prompt injections, jailbreaks, and malicious instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-02T16:53:21Z)
• UniDM: A Unified Framework for Data Manipulation with Large Language Models [66.61466011795798]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) resolve multiple data manipulation tasks. LLMs exhibit bright benefits in terms of performance but still require customized designs to fit each specific task. We propose UniDM, a unified framework which establishes a new paradigm to process data manipulation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T14:44:04Z)
• On the Effectiveness of Log Representation for Log-based Anomaly Detection [12.980238412281471]
  This work investigates and compares the commonly adopted log representation techniques from previous log analysis research. We select six log representation techniques and evaluate them with seven ML models and four public log datasets. We also examine the impacts of the log parsing process and the different feature aggregation approaches when they are employed with log representation techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-17T02:18:59Z)
• LogLAB: Attention-Based Labeling of Log Data Anomalies via Weak Supervision [63.08516384181491]
  We present LogLAB, a novel modeling approach for automated labeling of log messages without requiring manual work by experts. Our method relies on estimated failure time windows provided by monitoring systems to produce precise labeled datasets in retrospect. Our evaluation shows that LogLAB consistently outperforms nine benchmark approaches across three different datasets and maintains an F1-score of more than 0.98 even at large failure time windows.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-02T15:16:08Z)
• Self-Supervised Log Parsing [59.04636530383049]
  Large-scale software systems generate massive volumes of semi-structured log records. Existing approaches rely on log-specifics or manual rule extraction. We propose NuLog that utilizes a self-supervised learning model and formulates the parsing task as masked language modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-17T19:25:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.