Bayesian Reasoning for Physics Informed Neural Networks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.13222v2
• Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 12:06:47 GMT
• Title: Bayesian Reasoning for Physics Informed Neural Networks
• Authors: Krzysztof M. Graczyk, Kornel Witkowski,
• Abstract summary: We present the application of the physics-informed neural network (PINN) approach in Bayesian formulation. For each model or fit, the evidence is computed, which is a measure that classifies the hypothesis. We have shown that within the Bayesian framework, one can obtain the relative weights between the boundary and equation contributions to the total loss.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We present the application of the physics-informed neural network (PINN) approach in Bayesian formulation. We have adopted the Bayesian neural network framework to obtain posterior densities from Laplace approximation. For each model or fit, the evidence is computed, which is a measure that classifies the hypothesis. The optimal solution is the one with the highest value of evidence. We have proposed a modification of the Bayesian algorithm to obtain hyperparameters of the model. We have shown that within the Bayesian framework, one can obtain the relative weights between the boundary and equation contributions to the total loss. Presented method leads to predictions comparable to those obtained by sampling from the posterior distribution within the Hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm (HMC). We have solved heat, wave, and Burger's equations, and the results obtained are in agreement with the exact solutions, demonstrating the effectiveness of our approach. In Burger's equation problem, we have demonstrated that the framework can combine information from differential equations and potential measurements. All solutions are provided with uncertainties (induced by the model's parameter dependence) computed within the Bayesian framework.

Related papers

• Total Uncertainty Quantification in Inverse PDE Solutions Obtained with Reduced-Order Deep Learning Surrogate Models [50.90868087591973]
  We propose an approximate Bayesian method for quantifying the total uncertainty in inverse PDE solutions obtained with machine learning surrogate models. We test the proposed framework by comparing it with the iterative ensemble smoother and deep ensembling methods for a non-linear diffusion equation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-20T19:06:02Z)
• A variational neural Bayes framework for inference on intractable posterior distributions [1.0801976288811024]
  Posterior distributions of model parameters are efficiently obtained by feeding observed data into a trained neural network. We show theoretically that our posteriors converge to the true posteriors in Kullback-Leibler divergence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T20:40:15Z)
• Calibrating Neural Simulation-Based Inference with Differentiable Coverage Probability [50.44439018155837]
  We propose to include a calibration term directly into the training objective of the neural model. By introducing a relaxation of the classical formulation of calibration error we enable end-to-end backpropagation. It is directly applicable to existing computational pipelines allowing reliable black-box posterior inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T10:20:45Z)
• A probabilistic, data-driven closure model for RANS simulations with aleatoric, model uncertainty [1.8416014644193066]
  We propose a data-driven, closure model for Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations that incorporates aleatoric, model uncertainty. A fully Bayesian formulation is proposed, combined with a sparsity-inducing prior in order to identify regions in the problem domain where the parametric closure is insufficient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-05T16:53:31Z)
• An Optimization-based Deep Equilibrium Model for Hyperspectral Image Deconvolution with Convergence Guarantees [71.57324258813675]
  We propose a novel methodology for addressing the hyperspectral image deconvolution problem. A new optimization problem is formulated, leveraging a learnable regularizer in the form of a neural network. The derived iterative solver is then expressed as a fixed-point calculation problem within the Deep Equilibrium framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-10T08:25:16Z)
• Deep Learning Aided Laplace Based Bayesian Inference for Epidemiological Systems [2.596903831934905]
  We propose a hybrid approach where Laplace-based Bayesian inference is combined with an ANN architecture for obtaining approximations to the ODE trajectories. The effectiveness of our proposed methods is demonstrated using an epidemiological system with non-analytical solutions, the Susceptible-Infectious-Removed (SIR) model for infectious diseases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-17T09:02:41Z)
• Inverting brain grey matter models with likelihood-free inference: a tool for trustable cytoarchitecture measurements [62.997667081978825]
  characterisation of the brain grey matter cytoarchitecture with quantitative sensitivity to soma density and volume remains an unsolved challenge in dMRI. We propose a new forward model, specifically a new system of equations, requiring a few relatively sparse b-shells. We then apply modern tools from Bayesian analysis known as likelihood-free inference (LFI) to invert our proposed model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-15T09:08:27Z)
• Distributed Variational Bayesian Algorithms Over Sensor Networks [6.572330981878818]
  We propose two novel distributed VB algorithms for general Bayesian inference problem. The proposed algorithms have excellent performance, which are almost as good as the corresponding centralized VB algorithm relying on all data available in a fusion center.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-27T08:12:18Z)
• Disentangling the Gauss-Newton Method and Approximate Inference for Neural Networks [96.87076679064499]
  We disentangle the generalized Gauss-Newton and approximate inference for Bayesian deep learning. We find that the Gauss-Newton method simplifies the underlying probabilistic model significantly. The connection to Gaussian processes enables new function-space inference algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-21T17:42:58Z)
• Model Fusion with Kullback--Leibler Divergence [58.20269014662046]
  We propose a method to fuse posterior distributions learned from heterogeneous datasets. Our algorithm relies on a mean field assumption for both the fused model and the individual dataset posteriors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-13T03:27:45Z)
• Mean-Field Approximation to Gaussian-Softmax Integral with Application to Uncertainty Estimation [23.38076756988258]
  We propose a new single-model based approach to quantify uncertainty in deep neural networks. We use a mean-field approximation formula to compute an analytically intractable integral. Empirically, the proposed approach performs competitively when compared to state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-13T07:32:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.