MITRE ATT&CK: State of the Art and Way Forward

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.14016v1
• Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2023 06:26:35 GMT
• Title: MITRE ATT&CK: State of the Art and Way Forward
• Authors: Bader Al-Sada, Alireza Sadighian, Gabriele Oligeri,
• Abstract summary: No previous work has been devoted to the comprehensive collection, study and investigation of the current state of the art leveraging the MITRE ATT&CK framework. We select and inspect more than fifty major research contributions, while conducting a detailed analysis of their methodology and objectives in relation to the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
• Score: 2.0755366440393743
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: MITRE ATT&CK is a comprehensive framework of adversary tactics, techniques and procedures based on real-world observations. It has been used as a foundation for threat modelling in different sectors, such as government, academia and industry. To the best of our knowledge, no previous work has been devoted to the comprehensive collection, study and investigation of the current state of the art leveraging the MITRE ATT&CK framework. We select and inspect more than fifty major research contributions, while conducting a detailed analysis of their methodology and objectives in relation to the MITRE ATT&CK framework. We provide a categorization of the identified papers according to different criteria such as use cases, application scenarios, adopted methodologies and the use of additional data. Finally, we discuss open issues and future research directions involving not only the MITRE ATT&CK framework but also the fields of risk analysis and cyber-threat intelligence at large.

Related papers

• MITRE ATT&CK Applications in Cybersecurity and The Way Forward [18.339713576170396]
  The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a widely adopted tool for enhancing cybersecurity, supporting threat intelligence, incident response, attack modeling, and vulnerability prioritization. This paper synthesizes research on its application across these domains by analyzing 417 peer-reviewed publications. We identify commonly used adversarial tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) and examine the integration of natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML) with ATT&CK to improve threat detection and response.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-15T15:01:04Z)
• Survey on AI-Generated Media Detection: From Non-MLLM to MLLM [51.91311158085973]
  Methods for detecting AI-generated media have evolved rapidly. General-purpose detectors based on MLLMs integrate authenticity verification, explainability, and localization capabilities. Ethical and security considerations have emerged as critical global concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T12:18:20Z)
• Your Next State-of-the-Art Could Come from Another Domain: A Cross-Domain Analysis of Hierarchical Text Classification [13.210645250173997]
  Text classification with hierarchical labels is a prevalent and challenging task in natural language processing. We provide the first comprehensive cross-domain overview with empirical analysis of state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T10:08:57Z)
• Navigating the Risks: A Survey of Security, Privacy, and Ethics Threats in LLM-Based Agents [67.07177243654485]
  This survey collects and analyzes the different threats faced by large language models-based agents. We identify six key features of LLM-based agents, based on which we summarize the current research progress. We select four representative agents as case studies to analyze the risks they may face in practical use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-14T15:40:04Z)
• Key Design Choices in Source-Free Unsupervised Domain Adaptation: An In-depth Empirical Analysis [16.0130560365211]
  This study provides a benchmark framework for Source-Free Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (SF-UDA) in image classification. The study empirically examines a diverse set of SF-UDA techniques, assessing their consistency across datasets. It exhaustively evaluates pre-training datasets and strategies, particularly focusing on both supervised and self-supervised methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-25T13:37:36Z)
• Benchmarking Transferable Adversarial Attacks [6.898135768312255]
  The robustness of deep learning models against adversarial attacks remains a pivotal concern. This study systematically categorizes and critically evaluates various methodologies developed to augment the transferability of adversarial attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T08:36:16Z)
• Federated Learning for Generalization, Robustness, Fairness: A Survey and Benchmark [55.898771405172155]
  Federated learning has emerged as a promising paradigm for privacy-preserving collaboration among different parties. We provide a systematic overview of the important and recent developments of research on federated learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-12T06:32:30Z)
• Recent Advances in Embedding Methods for Multi-Object Tracking: A Survey [71.10448142010422]
  Multi-object tracking (MOT) aims to associate target objects across video frames in order to obtain entire moving trajectories. Embedding methods play an essential role in object location estimation and temporal identity association in MOT. We first conduct a comprehensive overview with in-depth analysis for embedding methods in MOT from seven different perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-22T06:54:33Z)
• Deep Learning Schema-based Event Extraction: Literature Review and Current Trends [60.29289298349322]
  Event extraction technology based on deep learning has become a research hotspot. This paper fills the gap by reviewing the state-of-the-art approaches, focusing on deep learning-based models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T16:32:45Z)
• XAI Method Properties: A (Meta-)study [0.0]
  We summarize the most cited and current in order to highlight the essential aspects of the state-of-the-art in XAI. We illustrate concepts from the higher-level taxonomy with more than 50 example methods, which we categorize accordingly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-15T09:52:00Z)
• A Survey on Text Classification: From Shallow to Deep Learning [83.47804123133719]
  The last decade has seen a surge of research in this area due to the unprecedented success of deep learning. This paper fills the gap by reviewing the state-of-the-art approaches from 1961 to 2021. We create a taxonomy for text classification according to the text involved and the models used for feature extraction and classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-02T00:09:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.