XAI Method Properties: A (Meta-)study

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.07190v1
• Date: Sat, 15 May 2021 09:52:00 GMT
• Title: XAI Method Properties: A (Meta-)study
• Authors: Gesina Schwalbe, Bettina Finzel
• Abstract summary: We summarize the most cited and current in order to highlight the essential aspects of the state-of-the-art in XAI. We illustrate concepts from the higher-level taxonomy with more than 50 example methods, which we categorize accordingly.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In the meantime, a wide variety of terminologies, motivations, approaches and evaluation criteria have been developed within the scope of research on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). Many taxonomies can be found in the literature, each with a different focus, but also showing many points of overlap. In this paper, we summarize the most cited and current taxonomies in a meta-analysis in order to highlight the essential aspects of the state-of-the-art in XAI. We also present and add terminologies as well as concepts from a large number of survey articles on the topic. Last but not least, we illustrate concepts from the higher-level taxonomy with more than 50 example methods, which we categorize accordingly, thus providing a wide-ranging overview of aspects of XAI and paving the way for use case-appropriate as well as context-specific subsequent research.

Related papers

• Why do you cite? An investigation on citation intents and decision-making classification processes [1.7812428873698407]
  This study emphasizes the importance of trustfully classifying citation intents. We present a study utilizing advanced Ensemble Strategies for Citation Intent Classification (CIC) One of our models sets as a new state-of-the-art (SOTA) with an 89.46% Macro-F1 score on the SciCite benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T09:29:33Z)
• Ontology Embedding: A Survey of Methods, Applications and Resources [54.3453925775069]
  Ontologies are widely used for representing domain knowledge and meta data. One straightforward solution is to integrate statistical analysis and machine learning. Numerous papers have been published on embedding, but a lack of systematic reviews hinders researchers from gaining a comprehensive understanding of this field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T14:49:19Z)
• Explainable AI (XAI) in Image Segmentation in Medicine, Industry, and Beyond: A Survey [0.10923877073891446]
  We present the first comprehensive survey on XAI in semantic image segmentation. This work focuses on techniques that were either specifically introduced for dense prediction tasks or were extended for them by modifying existing methods in classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T18:00:25Z)
• Interpretability is not Explainability: New Quantitative XAI Approach with a focus on Recommender Systems in Education [0.0]
  We propose a novel taxonomy that provides a clear and unambiguous understanding of the key concepts and relationships in XAI. Our approach is rooted in a systematic analysis of existing definitions and frameworks. This comprehensive taxonomy aims to establish a shared vocabulary for future research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T11:59:02Z)
• A Survey of Explainable AI in Deep Visual Modeling: Methods and Metrics [24.86176236641865]
  We present the first survey in Explainable AI that focuses on the methods and metrics for interpreting deep visual models. Covering the landmark contributions along the state-of-the-art, we not only provide a taxonomic organization of the existing techniques, but also excavate a range of evaluation metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-31T06:49:42Z)
• Knowledge-Aware Bayesian Deep Topic Model [50.58975785318575]
  We propose a Bayesian generative model for incorporating prior domain knowledge into hierarchical topic modeling. Our proposed model efficiently integrates the prior knowledge and improves both hierarchical topic discovery and document representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-20T09:16:05Z)
• Taxonomy Enrichment with Text and Graph Vector Representations [61.814256012166794]
  We address the problem of taxonomy enrichment which aims at adding new words to the existing taxonomy. We present a new method that allows achieving high results on this task with little effort. We achieve state-of-the-art results across different datasets and provide an in-depth error analysis of mistakes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-21T09:01:12Z)
• Argumentative XAI: A Survey [15.294433619347082]
  We overview XAI approaches built using methods from the field of computational argumentation. We focus on different types of explanation (intrinsic and post-hoc), different models with which argumentation-based explanations are deployed, different forms of delivery, and different argumentation frameworks they use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-24T13:32:59Z)
• Studying Taxonomy Enrichment on Diachronic WordNet Versions [70.27072729280528]
  We explore the possibilities of taxonomy extension in a resource-poor setting and present methods which are applicable to a large number of languages. We create novel English and Russian datasets for training and evaluating taxonomy enrichment models and describe a technique of creating such datasets for other languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-23T16:49:37Z)
• A Survey on Text Classification: From Shallow to Deep Learning [83.47804123133719]
  The last decade has seen a surge of research in this area due to the unprecedented success of deep learning. This paper fills the gap by reviewing the state-of-the-art approaches from 1961 to 2021. We create a taxonomy for text classification according to the text involved and the models used for feature extraction and classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-02T00:09:03Z)
• Deep Learning Based Text Classification: A Comprehensive Review [75.8403533775179]
  We provide a review of more than 150 deep learning based models for text classification developed in recent years. We also provide a summary of more than 40 popular datasets widely used for text classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-06T02:00:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.