Leveraging Linear Independence of Component Classifiers: Optimizing Size
and Prediction Accuracy for Online Ensembles
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.14175v1
- Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2023 18:38:09 GMT
- Title: Leveraging Linear Independence of Component Classifiers: Optimizing Size
and Prediction Accuracy for Online Ensembles
- Authors: Enes Bektas and Fazli Can
- Abstract summary: We introduce a novel perspective, rooted in the linear independence of classifier's votes, to analyze the interplay between ensemble size and prediction accuracy.
We present a method to determine the minimum ensemble size required to ensure a target probability of linearly independent votes.
Surprisingly, the calculated ideal ensemble size deviates from empirical results for certain datasets, emphasizing the influence of other factors.
- Score: 3.97048491084787
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Ensembles, which employ a set of classifiers to enhance classification
accuracy collectively, are crucial in the era of big data. However, although
there is general agreement that the relation between ensemble size and its
prediction accuracy, the exact nature of this relationship is still unknown. We
introduce a novel perspective, rooted in the linear independence of
classifier's votes, to analyze the interplay between ensemble size and
prediction accuracy. This framework reveals a theoretical link, consequently
proposing an ensemble size based on this relationship. Our study builds upon a
geometric framework and develops a series of theorems. These theorems clarify
the role of linear dependency in crafting ensembles. We present a method to
determine the minimum ensemble size required to ensure a target probability of
linearly independent votes among component classifiers. Incorporating real and
synthetic datasets, our empirical results demonstrate a trend: increasing the
number of classifiers enhances accuracy, as predicted by our theoretical
insights. However, we also identify a point of diminishing returns, beyond
which additional classifiers provide diminishing improvements in accuracy.
Surprisingly, the calculated ideal ensemble size deviates from empirical
results for certain datasets, emphasizing the influence of other factors. This
study opens avenues for deeper investigations into the complex dynamics
governing ensemble design and offers guidance for constructing efficient and
effective ensembles in practical scenarios.
Related papers
- Ranking and Combining Latent Structured Predictive Scores without Labeled Data [2.5064967708371553]
This paper introduces a novel structured unsupervised ensemble learning model (SUEL)
It exploits the dependency between a set of predictors with continuous predictive scores, rank the predictors without labeled data and combine them to an ensembled score with weights.
The efficacy of the proposed methods is rigorously assessed through both simulation studies and real-world application of risk genes discovery.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-14T20:14:42Z) - Detecting and Identifying Selection Structure in Sequential Data [53.24493902162797]
We argue that the selective inclusion of data points based on latent objectives is common in practical situations, such as music sequences.
We show that selection structure is identifiable without any parametric assumptions or interventional experiments.
We also propose a provably correct algorithm to detect and identify selection structures as well as other types of dependencies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-29T20:56:34Z) - Advancing Relation Extraction through Language Probing with Exemplars
from Set Co-Expansion [1.450405446885067]
Relation Extraction (RE) is a pivotal task in automatically extracting structured information from unstructured text.
We present a multi-faceted approach that integrates representative examples and through co-set expansion.
Our method achieves an observed margin of at least 1 percent improvement in accuracy in most settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-18T00:56:35Z) - Advancing Counterfactual Inference through Nonlinear Quantile Regression [77.28323341329461]
We propose a framework for efficient and effective counterfactual inference implemented with neural networks.
The proposed approach enhances the capacity to generalize estimated counterfactual outcomes to unseen data.
Empirical results conducted on multiple datasets offer compelling support for our theoretical assertions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-09T08:30:51Z) - On the Joint Interaction of Models, Data, and Features [82.60073661644435]
We introduce a new tool, the interaction tensor, for empirically analyzing the interaction between data and model through features.
Based on these observations, we propose a conceptual framework for feature learning.
Under this framework, the expected accuracy for a single hypothesis and agreement for a pair of hypotheses can both be derived in closed-form.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-07T21:35:26Z) - Variable Importance Matching for Causal Inference [73.25504313552516]
We describe a general framework called Model-to-Match that achieves these goals.
Model-to-Match uses variable importance measurements to construct a distance metric.
We operationalize the Model-to-Match framework with LASSO.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-23T00:43:03Z) - Context-Aware Ensemble Learning for Time Series [11.716677452529114]
We introduce a new approach using a meta learner that effectively combines the base model predictions via using a superset of the features that is the union of the base models' feature vectors instead of the predictions themselves.
Our model does not use the predictions of the base models as inputs to a machine learning algorithm, but choose the best possible combination at each time step based on the state of the problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-30T10:36:13Z) - On Neural Architecture Inductive Biases for Relational Tasks [76.18938462270503]
We introduce a simple architecture based on similarity-distribution scores which we name Compositional Network generalization (CoRelNet)
We find that simple architectural choices can outperform existing models in out-of-distribution generalizations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-09T16:24:01Z) - A Dataset-Level Geometric Framework for Ensemble Classifiers [0.76146285961466]
Majority voting and weighted majority voting are two commonly used combination schemes in ensemble learning.
We present a group of properties of these two combination schemes formally under a dataset-level geometric framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-16T09:48:12Z) - Deep Archimedean Copulas [98.96141706464425]
ACNet is a novel differentiable neural network architecture that enforces structural properties.
We show that ACNet is able to both approximate common Archimedean Copulas and generate new copulas which may provide better fits to data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-05T22:58:37Z) - Learning Discrete Structured Representations by Adversarially Maximizing
Mutual Information [39.87273353895564]
We propose learning discrete structured representations from unlabeled data by maximizing the mutual information between a structured latent variable and a target variable.
Our key technical contribution is an adversarial objective that can be used to tractably estimate mutual information assuming only the feasibility of cross entropy calculation.
We apply our model on document hashing and show that it outperforms current best baselines based on discrete and vector quantized variational autoencoders.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-08T13:31:53Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.