Advancing Counterfactual Inference through Nonlinear Quantile Regression

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.05751v3
• Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 04:01:47 GMT
• Title: Advancing Counterfactual Inference through Nonlinear Quantile Regression
• Authors: Shaoan Xie, Biwei Huang, Bin Gu, Tongliang Liu, Kun Zhang
• Abstract summary: We propose a framework for efficient and effective counterfactual inference implemented with neural networks. The proposed approach enhances the capacity to generalize estimated counterfactual outcomes to unseen data. Empirical results conducted on multiple datasets offer compelling support for our theoretical assertions.
• Score: 77.28323341329461
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The capacity to address counterfactual "what if" inquiries is crucial for understanding and making use of causal influences. Traditional counterfactual inference, under Pearls' counterfactual framework, typically depends on having access to or estimating a structural causal model. Yet, in practice, this causal model is often unknown and might be challenging to identify. Hence, this paper aims to perform reliable counterfactual inference based solely on observational data and the (learned) qualitative causal structure, without necessitating a predefined causal model or even direct estimations of conditional distributions. To this end, we establish a novel connection between counterfactual inference and quantile regression and show that counterfactual inference can be reframed as an extended quantile regression problem. Building on this insight, we propose a practical framework for efficient and effective counterfactual inference implemented with neural networks under a bi-level optimization scheme. The proposed approach enhances the capacity to generalize estimated counterfactual outcomes to unseen data, thereby providing an upper bound on the generalization error. Furthermore, empirical evidence demonstrates its superior statistical efficiency in comparison to existing methods. Empirical results conducted on multiple datasets offer compelling support for our theoretical assertions.

Related papers

• Learning Counterfactual Outcomes Under Rank Preservation [32.213816786727826]
  We propose a principled approach for identifying and estimating the counterfactual outcome. Our theoretical analysis shows that the rank preservation assumption is not stronger than the homogeneity and strict monotonicity assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T12:36:57Z)
• Causality can systematically address the monsters under the bench(marks) [64.36592889550431]
  Benchmarks are plagued by various biases, artifacts, or leakage. Models may behave unreliably due to poorly explored failure modes. causality offers an ideal framework to systematically address these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T17:01:37Z)
• Prediction-Powered E-Values [0.66567375919026]
  We apply ideas of prediction-powered inference to e-values. We show that every inference procedure that can be framed in terms of e-values has a prediction-powered counterpart. Our approach is modular and easily integrable into existing algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-06T18:36:01Z)
• Bridging Internal Probability and Self-Consistency for Effective and Efficient LLM Reasoning [53.25336975467293]
  We present the first theoretical error decomposition analysis of methods such as perplexity and self-consistency. Our analysis reveals a fundamental trade-off: perplexity methods suffer from substantial model error due to the absence of a proper consistency function. We propose Reasoning-Pruning Perplexity Consistency (RPC), which integrates perplexity with self-consistency, and Reasoning Pruning, which eliminates low-probability reasoning paths.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-01T18:09:49Z)
• Counterfactual Generative Modeling with Variational Causal Inference [1.9287470458589586]
  We present a novel variational Bayesian causal inference framework to handle counterfactual generative modeling tasks. In experiments, we demonstrate the advantage of our framework compared to state-of-the-art models in counterfactual generative modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T16:44:12Z)
• The Foundations of Tokenization: Statistical and Computational Concerns [51.370165245628975]
  Tokenization is a critical step in the NLP pipeline. Despite its recognized importance as a standard representation method in NLP, the theoretical underpinnings of tokenization are not yet fully understood. The present paper contributes to addressing this theoretical gap by proposing a unified formal framework for representing and analyzing tokenizer models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T11:12:28Z)
• Deriving Causal Order from Single-Variable Interventions: Guarantees & Algorithm [14.980926991441345]
  We show that datasets containing interventional data can be effectively extracted under realistic assumptions about the data distribution. We introduce interventional faithfulness, which relies on comparisons between the marginal distributions of each variable across observational and interventional settings. We also introduce Intersort, an algorithm designed to infer the causal order from datasets containing large numbers of single-variable interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T16:07:17Z)
• Towards Characterizing Domain Counterfactuals For Invertible Latent Causal Models [15.817239008727789]
  In this work, we analyze a specific type of causal query called domain counterfactuals, which hypothesizes what a sample would have looked like if it had been generated in a different domain. We show that recovering the latent Structural Causal Model (SCM) is unnecessary for estimating domain counterfactuals. We also develop a theoretically grounded practical algorithm that simplifies the modeling process to generative model estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T04:19:06Z)
• Exploring the Trade-off between Plausibility, Change Intensity and Adversarial Power in Counterfactual Explanations using Multi-objective Optimization [73.89239820192894]
  We argue that automated counterfactual generation should regard several aspects of the produced adversarial instances. We present a novel framework for the generation of counterfactual examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T15:02:53Z)
• Trust but Verify: Assigning Prediction Credibility by Counterfactual Constrained Learning [123.3472310767721]
  Prediction credibility measures are fundamental in statistics and machine learning. These measures should account for the wide variety of models used in practice. The framework developed in this work expresses the credibility as a risk-fit trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-24T19:52:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.