AI Deception: A Survey of Examples, Risks, and Potential Solutions
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.14752v1
- Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 17:59:35 GMT
- Title: AI Deception: A Survey of Examples, Risks, and Potential Solutions
- Authors: Peter S. Park, Simon Goldstein, Aidan O'Gara, Michael Chen, Dan
Hendrycks
- Abstract summary: This paper argues that a range of current AI systems have learned how to deceive humans.
We define deception as the systematic inducement of false beliefs in the pursuit of some outcome other than the truth.
- Score: 20.84424818447696
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: This paper argues that a range of current AI systems have learned how to
deceive humans. We define deception as the systematic inducement of false
beliefs in the pursuit of some outcome other than the truth. We first survey
empirical examples of AI deception, discussing both special-use AI systems
(including Meta's CICERO) built for specific competitive situations, and
general-purpose AI systems (such as large language models). Next, we detail
several risks from AI deception, such as fraud, election tampering, and losing
control of AI systems. Finally, we outline several potential solutions to the
problems posed by AI deception: first, regulatory frameworks should subject AI
systems that are capable of deception to robust risk-assessment requirements;
second, policymakers should implement bot-or-not laws; and finally,
policymakers should prioritize the funding of relevant research, including
tools to detect AI deception and to make AI systems less deceptive.
Policymakers, researchers, and the broader public should work proactively to
prevent AI deception from destabilizing the shared foundations of our society.
Related papers
- Combining AI Control Systems and Human Decision Support via Robustness and Criticality [53.10194953873209]
We extend a methodology for adversarial explanations (AE) to state-of-the-art reinforcement learning frameworks.
We show that the learned AI control system demonstrates robustness against adversarial tampering.
In a training / learning framework, this technology can improve both the AI's decisions and explanations through human interaction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-03T15:38:57Z) - Societal Adaptation to Advanced AI [1.2607853680700076]
Existing strategies for managing risks from advanced AI systems often focus on affecting what AI systems are developed and how they diffuse.
We urge a complementary approach: increasing societal adaptation to advanced AI.
We introduce a conceptual framework which helps identify adaptive interventions that avoid, defend against and remedy potentially harmful uses of AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-16T17:52:12Z) - Particip-AI: A Democratic Surveying Framework for Anticipating Future AI Use Cases, Harms and Benefits [54.648819983899614]
Particip-AI is a framework to gather current and future AI use cases and their harms and benefits from non-expert public.
We gather responses from 295 demographically diverse participants.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-21T19:12:37Z) - Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress [171.05448842016125]
We describe risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems.
There is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them.
Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-26T17:59:06Z) - Intent-aligned AI systems deplete human agency: the need for agency
foundations research in AI safety [2.3572498744567127]
We argue that alignment to human intent is insufficient for safe AI systems.
We argue that preservation of long-term agency of humans may be a more robust standard.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-30T17:14:01Z) - Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time.
We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups.
If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z) - Aligning Artificial Intelligence with Humans through Public Policy [0.0]
This essay outlines research on AI that learn structures in policy data that can be leveraged for downstream tasks.
We believe this represents the "comprehension" phase of AI and policy, but leveraging policy as a key source of human values to align AI requires "understanding" policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-25T21:31:14Z) - Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary
Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them.
We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives.
We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z) - Cybertrust: From Explainable to Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) [58.981120701284816]
Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) will incorporate explicit quantifications and visualizations of user confidence in AI recommendations.
It will allow examining and testing of AI system predictions to establish a basis for trust in the systems' decision making.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-26T18:53:09Z) - AI Failures: A Review of Underlying Issues [0.0]
We focus on AI failures on account of flaws in conceptualization, design and deployment.
We find that AI systems fail on account of omission and commission errors in the design of the AI system.
An AI system is quite likely to fail in situations where, in effect, it is called upon to deliver moral judgments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-18T15:31:29Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.