"Make Them Change it Every Week!": A Qualitative Exploration of Online Developer Advice on Usable and Secure Authentication
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.00744v2
- Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2023 21:25:17 GMT
- Title: "Make Them Change it Every Week!": A Qualitative Exploration of Online Developer Advice on Usable and Secure Authentication
- Authors: Jan H. Klemmer, Marco Gutfleisch, Christian Stransky, Yasemin Acar, M. Angela Sasse, Sascha Fahl,
- Abstract summary: We aim to understand the accessibility and quality of online advice and provide insights into how online advice might contribute to (in)secure and (un)usable authentication.
Based on a survey with 18 professional web developers, we obtained 406 documents and qualitatively analyzed 272 contained pieces of advice in depth.
The most common advice is for password-based authentication, but little for more modern alternatives.
- Score: 21.58767421554059
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Usable and secure authentication on the web and beyond is mission-critical. While password-based authentication is still widespread, users have trouble dealing with potentially hundreds of online accounts and their passwords. Alternatives or extensions such as multi-factor authentication have their own challenges and find only limited adoption. Finding the right balance between security and usability is challenging for developers. Previous work found that developers use online resources to inform security decisions when writing code. Similar to other areas, lots of authentication advice for developers is available online, including blog posts, discussions on Stack Overflow, research papers, or guidelines by institutions like OWASP or NIST. We are the first to explore developer advice on authentication that affects usable security for end-users. Based on a survey with 18 professional web developers, we obtained 406 documents and qualitatively analyzed 272 contained pieces of advice in depth. We aim to understand the accessibility and quality of online advice and provide insights into how online advice might contribute to (in)secure and (un)usable authentication. We find that advice is scattered and that finding recommendable, consistent advice is a challenge for developers, among others. The most common advice is for password-based authentication, but little for more modern alternatives. Unfortunately, many pieces of advice are debatable (e.g., complex password policies), outdated (e.g., enforcing regular password changes), or contradicting and might lead to unusable or insecure authentication. Based on our findings, we make recommendations for developers, advice providers, official institutions, and academia on how to improve online advice for developers.
Related papers
- Nudging Users to Change Breached Passwords Using the Protection Motivation Theory [58.87688846800743]
We draw on the Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) to design nudges that encourage users to change breached passwords.
Our study contributes to PMT's application in security research and provides concrete design implications for improving compromised credential notifications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-24T07:51:15Z) - Evaluating the Influence of Multi-Factor Authentication and Recovery Settings on the Security and Accessibility of User Accounts [0.0]
This paper presents a study on the account settings of Google and Apple users.
Considering the multi-factor authentication configuration and recovery options, we analyzed the account security and lock-out risks.
Our results provide insights into the usage of multi-factor authentication in practice, show significant security differences between Google and Apple accounts, and reveal that many users would miss access to their accounts when losing a single authentication device.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-22T10:05:37Z) - Passwords Are Meant to Be Secret: A Practical Secure Password Entry Channel for Web Browsers [7.049738935364298]
Malicious client-side scripts and browser extensions can steal passwords after they have been autofilled by the manager into the web page.
This paper explores what role the password manager can take in preventing the theft of autofilled credentials without requiring a change to user behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-09T03:21:14Z) - User Consented Federated Recommender System Against Personalized
Attribute Inference Attack [55.24441467292359]
We propose a user-consented federated recommendation system (UC-FedRec) to flexibly satisfy the different privacy needs of users.
UC-FedRec allows users to self-define their privacy preferences to meet various demands and makes recommendations with user consent.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-23T09:44:57Z) - A Review of Password-less User Authentication Schemes [0.0]
Review examines password-less authentication schemes that have been proposed since after the death knell was placed on passwords in 2004.
We evaluate the truly password-less and practical schemes based on their impact on user experience, overall security, and ease of deployment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-05T15:57:40Z) - An Exploration Into Web Session Security- A Systematic Literature Review [0.0]
The most common attacks against web sessions are reviewed in this paper, for example, some attacks against web browsers' honest users attempting to create session with trusted web browser application legally.
We have assessed with four different ways to judge the viability of a certain solution by reviewing existing security solutions which prevent or halt the different attacks.
The guidelines we have identified will be helpful for the creative solutions proceeding web security in a more structured and holistic way.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-14T16:22:07Z) - SyzTrust: State-aware Fuzzing on Trusted OS Designed for IoT Devices [67.65883495888258]
We present SyzTrust, the first state-aware fuzzing framework for vetting the security of resource-limited Trusted OSes.
SyzTrust adopts a hardware-assisted framework to enable fuzzing Trusted OSes directly on IoT devices.
We evaluate SyzTrust on Trusted OSes from three major vendors: Samsung, Tsinglink Cloud, and Ali Cloud.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-26T08:11:38Z) - Exploring Security Practices in Infrastructure as Code: An Empirical
Study [54.669404064111795]
Cloud computing has become popular thanks to the widespread use of Infrastructure as Code (IaC) tools.
scripting process does not automatically prevent practitioners from introducing misconfigurations, vulnerabilities, or privacy risks.
Ensuring security relies on practitioners understanding and the adoption of explicit policies, guidelines, or best practices.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-07T23:43:32Z) - Tales from the Git: Automating the detection of secrets on code and
assessing developers' passwords choices [8.086010366384247]
This is the first study investigating the developer traits in password selection across different programming languages and contexts.
Despite the fact that developers may have carelessly leaked their code on public repositories, our findings indicate that they tend to use significantly more secure passwords.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-03T09:44:10Z) - Provable Safe Reinforcement Learning with Binary Feedback [62.257383728544006]
We consider the problem of provable safe RL when given access to an offline oracle providing binary feedback on the safety of state, action pairs.
We provide a novel meta algorithm, SABRE, which can be applied to any MDP setting given access to a blackbox PAC RL algorithm for that setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-26T05:37:51Z) - Smart Home, security concerns of IoT [91.3755431537592]
The IoT (Internet of Things) has become widely popular in the domestic environments.
People are renewing their homes into smart homes; however, the privacy concerns of owning many Internet connected devices with always-on environmental sensors remain insufficiently addressed.
Default and weak passwords, cheap materials and hardware, and unencrypted communication are identified as the principal threats and vulnerabilities of IoT devices.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-06T10:36:11Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.