Structured Radial Basis Function Network: Modelling Diversity for Multiple Hypotheses Prediction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.00781v1
• Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2023 01:27:53 GMT
• Title: Structured Radial Basis Function Network: Modelling Diversity for Multiple Hypotheses Prediction
• Authors: Alejandro Rodriguez Dominguez, Muhammad Shahzad and Xia Hong
• Abstract summary: Multi-modal regression is important in forecasting nonstationary processes or with a complex mixture of distributions. A Structured Radial Basis Function Network is presented as an ensemble of multiple hypotheses predictors for regression problems. It is proved that this structured model can efficiently interpolate this tessellation and approximate the multiple hypotheses target distribution.
• Score: 51.82628081279621
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Multi-modal regression is important in forecasting nonstationary processes or with a complex mixture of distributions. It can be tackled with multiple hypotheses frameworks but with the difficulty of combining them efficiently in a learning model. A Structured Radial Basis Function Network is presented as an ensemble of multiple hypotheses predictors for regression problems. The predictors are regression models of any type that can form centroidal Voronoi tessellations which are a function of their losses during training. It is proved that this structured model can efficiently interpolate this tessellation and approximate the multiple hypotheses target distribution and is equivalent to interpolating the meta-loss of the predictors, the loss being a zero set of the interpolation error. This model has a fixed-point iteration algorithm between the predictors and the centers of the basis functions. Diversity in learning can be controlled parametrically by truncating the tessellation formation with the losses of individual predictors. A closed-form solution with least-squares is presented, which to the authors knowledge, is the fastest solution in the literature for multiple hypotheses and structured predictions. Superior generalization performance and computational efficiency is achieved using only two-layer neural networks as predictors controlling diversity as a key component of success. A gradient-descent approach is introduced which is loss-agnostic regarding the predictors. The expected value for the loss of the structured model with Gaussian basis functions is computed, finding that correlation between predictors is not an appropriate tool for diversification. The experiments show outperformance with respect to the top competitors in the literature.

Related papers

• Ranking and Combining Latent Structured Predictive Scores without Labeled Data [2.5064967708371553]
  This paper introduces a novel structured unsupervised ensemble learning model (SUEL) It exploits the dependency between a set of predictors with continuous predictive scores, rank the predictors without labeled data and combine them to an ensembled score with weights. The efficacy of the proposed methods is rigorously assessed through both simulation studies and real-world application of risk genes discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T20:14:42Z)
• Zero-Shot Uncertainty Quantification using Diffusion Probabilistic Models [7.136205674624813]
  We conduct a study to evaluate the effectiveness of ensemble methods on solving different regression problems using diffusion models. We demonstrate that ensemble methods consistently improve model prediction accuracy across various regression tasks. Our study provides a comprehensive view of the utility of diffusion ensembles, serving as a useful reference for practitioners employing diffusion models in regression problem-solving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T18:34:52Z)
• Scaling and renormalization in high-dimensional regression [72.59731158970894]
  This paper presents a succinct derivation of the training and generalization performance of a variety of high-dimensional ridge regression models. We provide an introduction and review of recent results on these topics, aimed at readers with backgrounds in physics and deep learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T15:59:00Z)
• On the Generalization and Adaption Performance of Causal Models [99.64022680811281]
  Differentiable causal discovery has proposed to factorize the data generating process into a set of modules. We study the generalization and adaption performance of such modular neural causal models. Our analysis shows that the modular neural causal models outperform other models on both zero and few-shot adaptation in low data regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-09T17:12:32Z)
• Benign-Overfitting in Conditional Average Treatment Effect Prediction with Linear Regression [14.493176427999028]
  We study the benign overfitting theory in the prediction of the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) with linear regression models. We show that the T-learner fails to achieve the consistency except the random assignment, while the IPW-learner converges the risk to zero if the propensity score is known.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-10T18:51:52Z)
• Model Compression for Dynamic Forecast Combination [9.281199058905017]
  We show that compressing dynamic forecasting ensembles into an individual model leads to a comparable predictive performance. We also show that the compressed individual model with best average rank is a rule-based regression model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-05T09:55:35Z)
• Improving Uncertainty Calibration via Prior Augmented Data [56.88185136509654]
  Neural networks have proven successful at learning from complex data distributions by acting as universal function approximators. They are often overconfident in their predictions, which leads to inaccurate and miscalibrated probabilistic predictions. We propose a solution by seeking out regions of feature space where the model is unjustifiably overconfident, and conditionally raising the entropy of those predictions towards that of the prior distribution of the labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-22T07:02:37Z)
• Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
  We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation. We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)
• Good Classifiers are Abundant in the Interpolating Regime [64.72044662855612]
  We develop a methodology to compute precisely the full distribution of test errors among interpolating classifiers. We find that test errors tend to concentrate around a small typical value $varepsilon*$, which deviates substantially from the test error of worst-case interpolating model. Our results show that the usual style of analysis in statistical learning theory may not be fine-grained enough to capture the good generalization performance observed in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T21:12:31Z)
• A comprehensive study on the prediction reliability of graph neural networks for virtual screening [0.0]
  We investigate the effects of model architectures, regularization methods, and loss functions on the prediction performance and reliability of classification results. Our result highlights that correct choice of regularization and inference methods is evidently important to achieve high success rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-17T10:13:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.