Zero-Shot Uncertainty Quantification using Diffusion Probabilistic Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.04718v1
• Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 18:34:52 GMT
• Title: Zero-Shot Uncertainty Quantification using Diffusion Probabilistic Models
• Authors: Dule Shu, Amir Barati Farimani,
• Abstract summary: We conduct a study to evaluate the effectiveness of ensemble methods on solving different regression problems using diffusion models. We demonstrate that ensemble methods consistently improve model prediction accuracy across various regression tasks. Our study provides a comprehensive view of the utility of diffusion ensembles, serving as a useful reference for practitioners employing diffusion models in regression problem-solving.
• Score: 7.136205674624813
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The success of diffusion probabilistic models in generative tasks, such as text-to-image generation, has motivated the exploration of their application to regression problems commonly encountered in scientific computing and various other domains. In this context, the use of diffusion regression models for ensemble prediction is becoming a practice with increasing popularity. Under such background, we conducted a study to quantitatively evaluate the effectiveness of ensemble methods on solving different regression problems using diffusion models. We consider the ensemble prediction of a diffusion model as a means for zero-shot uncertainty quantification, since the diffusion models in our study are not trained with a loss function containing any uncertainty estimation. Through extensive experiments on 1D and 2D data, we demonstrate that ensemble methods consistently improve model prediction accuracy across various regression tasks. Notably, we observed a larger accuracy gain in auto-regressive prediction compared with point-wise prediction, and that enhancements take place in both the mean-square error and the physics-informed loss. Additionally, we reveal a statistical correlation between ensemble prediction error and ensemble variance, offering insights into balancing computational complexity with prediction accuracy and monitoring prediction confidence in practical applications where the ground truth is unknown. Our study provides a comprehensive view of the utility of diffusion ensembles, serving as a useful reference for practitioners employing diffusion models in regression problem-solving.

Related papers

• Diffusion Attribution Score: Evaluating Training Data Influence in Diffusion Model [22.39558434131574]
  Existing data attribution methods for diffusion models typically quantify the contribution of a training sample. We argue that the direct usage of diffusion loss cannot represent such a contribution accurately due to the calculation of diffusion loss. We aim to measure the direct comparison between predicted distributions with an attribution score to analyse the training sample importance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T10:58:17Z)
• Quantifying Distribution Shifts and Uncertainties for Enhanced Model Robustness in Machine Learning Applications [0.0]
  This study explores model adaptation and generalization by utilizing synthetic data. We employ quantitative measures such as Kullback-Leibler divergence, Jensen-Shannon distance, and Mahalanobis distance to assess data similarity. Our findings suggest that utilizing statistical measures, such as the Mahalanobis distance, to determine whether model predictions fall within the low-error "interpolation regime" or the high-error "extrapolation regime" provides a complementary method for assessing distribution shift and model uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-03T10:05:31Z)
• Estimating Epistemic and Aleatoric Uncertainty with a Single Model [5.871583927216653]
  We introduce a new approach to ensembling, hyper-diffusion models (HyperDM) HyperDM offers prediction accuracy on par with, and in some cases superior to, multi-model ensembles. We validate our method on two distinct real-world tasks: x-ray computed tomography reconstruction and weather temperature forecasting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T19:39:52Z)
• Structured Radial Basis Function Network: Modelling Diversity for Multiple Hypotheses Prediction [51.82628081279621]
  Multi-modal regression is important in forecasting nonstationary processes or with a complex mixture of distributions. A Structured Radial Basis Function Network is presented as an ensemble of multiple hypotheses predictors for regression problems. It is proved that this structured model can efficiently interpolate this tessellation and approximate the multiple hypotheses target distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-02T01:27:53Z)
• Aleatoric uncertainty for Errors-in-Variables models in deep regression [0.48733623015338234]
  We show how the concept of Errors-in-Variables can be used in Bayesian deep regression. We discuss the approach along various simulated and real examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-19T12:37:02Z)
• Improving Uncertainty Calibration via Prior Augmented Data [56.88185136509654]
  Neural networks have proven successful at learning from complex data distributions by acting as universal function approximators. They are often overconfident in their predictions, which leads to inaccurate and miscalibrated probabilistic predictions. We propose a solution by seeking out regions of feature space where the model is unjustifiably overconfident, and conditionally raising the entropy of those predictions towards that of the prior distribution of the labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-22T07:02:37Z)
• Trust but Verify: Assigning Prediction Credibility by Counterfactual Constrained Learning [123.3472310767721]
  Prediction credibility measures are fundamental in statistics and machine learning. These measures should account for the wide variety of models used in practice. The framework developed in this work expresses the credibility as a risk-fit trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-24T19:52:38Z)
• Double Robust Representation Learning for Counterfactual Prediction [68.78210173955001]
  We propose a novel scalable method to learn double-robust representations for counterfactual predictions. We make robust and efficient counterfactual predictions for both individual and average treatment effects. The algorithm shows competitive performance with the state-of-the-art on real world and synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T16:39:26Z)
• Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
  We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation. We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)
• Balance-Subsampled Stable Prediction [55.13512328954456]
  We propose a novel balance-subsampled stable prediction (BSSP) algorithm based on the theory of fractional factorial design. A design-theoretic analysis shows that the proposed method can reduce the confounding effects among predictors induced by the distribution shift. Numerical experiments on both synthetic and real-world data sets demonstrate that our BSSP algorithm significantly outperforms the baseline methods for stable prediction across unknown test data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-08T07:01:38Z)
• A comprehensive study on the prediction reliability of graph neural networks for virtual screening [0.0]
  We investigate the effects of model architectures, regularization methods, and loss functions on the prediction performance and reliability of classification results. Our result highlights that correct choice of regularization and inference methods is evidently important to achieve high success rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-17T10:13:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.