The Case for Anticipating Undesirable Consequences of Computing Innovations Early, Often, and Across Computer Science

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.04456v1
• Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2023 17:32:22 GMT
• Title: The Case for Anticipating Undesirable Consequences of Computing Innovations Early, Often, and Across Computer Science
• Authors: Rock Yuren Pang, Dan Grossman, Tadayoshi Kohno, Katharina Reinecke
• Abstract summary: Our society increasingly bears the burden of negative, if unintended, consequences of computing innovations. Our prior work showed that many of us recognize the value of thinking preemptively about the perils our research can pose, yet we tend to address them only in hindsight. How can we change the culture in which considering undesirable consequences of digital technology is deemed as important, but is not commonly done?
• Score: 24.13786694863084
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: From smart sensors that infringe on our privacy to neural nets that portray realistic imposter deepfakes, our society increasingly bears the burden of negative, if unintended, consequences of computing innovations. As the experts in the technology we create, Computer Science (CS) researchers must do better at anticipating and addressing these undesirable consequences proactively. Our prior work showed that many of us recognize the value of thinking preemptively about the perils our research can pose, yet we tend to address them only in hindsight. How can we change the culture in which considering undesirable consequences of digital technology is deemed as important, but is not commonly done?

Related papers

• A Collectivist, Economic Perspective on AI [65.268245109828]
  Information technology is in the midst of a revolution in which omnipresent data collection and machine learning are impacting the human world as never before.<n>This view neglects the fact that humans are social animals, and that much of our intelligence is social and cultural in origin.<n>The path forward is not merely more data and compute, but a thorough blending of economic and social concepts with computational and inferential concepts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-08T03:07:43Z)
• Combating the Effects of Cyber-Psychosis: Using Object Security to Facilitate Critical Thinking [3.8247956248256094]
  Humanity is facing an existential crisis about the nature of truth and reality driven by the availability of information online. We propose that the Internet needs an object security service layer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T23:17:19Z)
• Twenty Years of Personality Computing: Threats, Challenges and Future Directions [76.46813522861632]
  Personality Computing is a field at the intersection of Personality Psychology and Computer Science. This paper provides an overview of the field, explores key methodologies, discusses the challenges and threats, and outlines potential future directions for responsible development and deployment of Personality Computing technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T22:03:48Z)
• Addressing the Unforeseen Harms of Technology CCC Whitepaper [17.079055802371435]
  This whitepaper explores how to address possible harmful consequences of computing technologies. It starts from the assumption that very few harms due to technology are intentional or deliberate. There are concrete steps that can be taken to address the difficult problem of anticipating and responding to potential harms from new technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-12T18:16:37Z)
• Deepfake Media Forensics: State of the Art and Challenges Ahead [51.33414186878676]
  AI-generated synthetic media, also called Deepfakes, have influenced so many domains, from entertainment to cybersecurity. Deepfake detection has become a vital area of research, focusing on identifying subtle inconsistencies and artifacts with machine learning techniques. This paper reviews the primary algorithms that address these challenges, examining their advantages, limitations, and future prospects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-01T08:57:47Z)
• BLIP: Facilitating the Exploration of Undesirable Consequences of Digital Technologies [20.27853476331588]
  We introduce BLIP, a system that extracts real-world undesirable consequences of technology from online articles. In two user studies with 15 researchers, BLIP substantially increased the number and diversity of undesirable consequences they could list. BLIP helped them identify undesirable consequences relevant to their ongoing projects, made them aware of undesirable consequences they "had never considered," and inspired them to reflect on their own experiences with technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T19:21:19Z)
• Control Risk for Potential Misuse of Artificial Intelligence in Science [85.91232985405554]
  We aim to raise awareness of the dangers of AI misuse in science. We highlight real-world examples of misuse in chemical science. We propose a system called SciGuard to control misuse risks for AI models in science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-11T18:50:57Z)
• Brain-Inspired Computational Intelligence via Predictive Coding [89.6335791546526]
  Predictive coding (PC) has shown promising performance in machine intelligence tasks. PC can model information processing in different brain areas, can be used in cognitive control and robotics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-15T16:37:16Z)
• Reliable AI: Does the Next Generation Require Quantum Computing? [71.84486326350338]
  We show that digital hardware is inherently constrained in solving problems about optimization, deep learning, or differential equations. In contrast, analog computing models, such as the Blum-Shub-Smale machine, exhibit the potential to surmount these limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-03T19:10:45Z)
• The Age of Synthetic Realities: Challenges and Opportunities [85.058932103181]
  We highlight the crucial need for the development of forensic techniques capable of identifying harmful synthetic creations and distinguishing them from reality. Our focus extends to various forms of media, such as images, videos, audio, and text, as we examine how synthetic realities are crafted and explore approaches to detecting these malicious creations. This study is of paramount importance due to the rapid progress of AI generative techniques and their impact on the fundamental principles of Forensic Science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T15:55:10Z)
• "That's important, but...": How Computer Science Researchers Anticipate Unintended Consequences of Their Research Innovations [12.947525301829835]
  We show that considering unintended consequences is generally seen as important but rarely practiced. Principal barriers are a lack of formal process and strategy as well as the academic practice that prioritizes fast progress and publications. We intend for our work to pave the way for routine explorations of the societal implications of technological innovations before, during, and after the research process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-27T18:21:29Z)
• Physical Adversarial Attack meets Computer Vision: A Decade Survey [55.38113802311365]
  This paper presents a comprehensive overview of physical adversarial attacks. We take the first step to systematically evaluate the performance of physical adversarial attacks. Our proposed evaluation metric, hiPAA, comprises six perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T01:59:53Z)
• It's Time to Do Something: Mitigating the Negative Impacts of Computing Through a Change to the Peer Review Process [39.25245714097946]
  We believe we can achieve substantial progress with a straightforward step: making a small change to the peer review process. As we explain below, we hypothesize that our recommended change will force computing researchers to more deeply consider the negative impacts of their work. We also expect that this change will incentivize research and policy that alleviates computing's negative impacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-17T14:51:57Z)
• When we can trust computers (and when we can't) [0.0]
  In the domains of science and engineering that are relatively simple and firmly grounded in theory, these methods are indeed powerful. The rise of big data and machine learning pose new challenges to computation, while lacking true explanatory power. In the long-term, renewed emphasis on analogue methods will be necessary to temper the excessive faith currently placed in digital computation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-08T08:55:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.