ChatGPT impacts in programming education: A recent literature overview that debates ChatGPT responses

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.12348v2
• Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:12:21 GMT
• Title: ChatGPT impacts in programming education: A recent literature overview that debates ChatGPT responses
• Authors: Christos-Nikolaos Anagnostopoulos
• Abstract summary: It lists, covers and documents from the literature the major issues that have been identified for this topic. The paper ends with a short discussion on what is expected to happen in the near future.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper aims at a brief overview of the main impact of ChatGTP in the scientific field of programming and learning/education in computer science. It lists, covers and documents from the literature the major issues that have been identified for this topic, such as applications, advantages and limitations, ethical issues raised. Answers to the above questions were solicited from ChatGPT itself, the responses were collected, and then the recent literature was surveyed to determine whether or not the responses are supported. The paper ends with a short discussion on what is expected to happen in the near future. A future that can be extremely promising if humanity manages to have AI as a proper ally and partner, with distinct roles and specific rules of cooperation and interaction.

Related papers

• How Large Language Models Are Changing MOOC Essay Answers: A Comparison of Pre- and Post-LLM Responses [2.681175517296992]
  We analyze essay responses from a free university-level MOOC on AI ethics. We find that the launch of ChatGPT coincided with significant changes in both the length and style of student essays. We also observe -- as expected based on related public discourse -- changes in prevalence of key content words related to AI and LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-17T15:51:59Z)
• What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review? [173.8912784451817]
  In modern science, peer review is widely used, yet it is hard, time-consuming, and prone to error. Since the artifacts involved in peer review are largely text-based, Natural Language Processing has great potential to improve reviewing. We detail each step of the process from manuscript submission to camera-ready revision, and discuss the associated challenges and opportunities for NLP assistance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T16:06:43Z)
• Enhancing Programming Education with ChatGPT: A Case Study on Student Perceptions and Interactions in a Python Course [7.182952031323369]
  This paper explores ChatGPT's impact on learning in a Python programming course tailored for first-year students over eight weeks. By analyzing responses from surveys, open-ended questions, and student-ChatGPT dialog data, we aim to provide a comprehensive view of ChatGPT's utility. Our study uncovers a generally positive reception toward ChatGPT and offers insights into its role in enhancing the programming education experience.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T15:47:28Z)
• Chatbot-supported Thesis Writing: An Autoethnographic Report [0.0]
  ChatGPT might be applied to formats that require learners to generate text, such as bachelor theses or student research papers. ChatGPT is to be valued as a beneficial tool in thesis writing. However, writing a conclusive thesis still requires the learner's meaningful engagement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-14T09:09:26Z)
• PaperCard for Reporting Machine Assistance in Academic Writing [48.33722012818687]
  ChatGPT, a question-answering system released by OpenAI in November 2022, has demonstrated a range of capabilities that could be utilised in producing academic papers. This raises critical questions surrounding the concept of authorship in academia. We propose a framework we name "PaperCard", a documentation for human authors to transparently declare the use of AI in their writing process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-07T14:28:04Z)
• Covering Uncommon Ground: Gap-Focused Question Generation for Answer Assessment [75.59538732476346]
  We focus on the problem of generating such gap-focused questions (GFQs) automatically. We define the task, highlight key desired aspects of a good GFQ, and propose a model that satisfies these.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-06T22:21:42Z)
• UKP-SQuARE: An Interactive Tool for Teaching Question Answering [61.93372227117229]
  The exponential growth of question answering (QA) has made it an indispensable topic in any Natural Language Processing (NLP) course. We introduce UKP-SQuARE as a platform for QA education. Students can run, compare, and analyze various QA models from different perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T11:29:04Z)
• Uncovering the Potential of ChatGPT for Discourse Analysis in Dialogue: An Empirical Study [51.079100495163736]
  This paper systematically inspects ChatGPT's performance in two discourse analysis tasks: topic segmentation and discourse parsing. ChatGPT demonstrates proficiency in identifying topic structures in general-domain conversations yet struggles considerably in specific-domain conversations. Our deeper investigation indicates that ChatGPT can give more reasonable topic structures than human annotations but only linearly parses the hierarchical rhetorical structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-15T07:14:41Z)
• Let's have a chat! A Conversation with ChatGPT: Technology, Applications, and Limitations [0.0]
  Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer, better known as ChatGPT, can generate human-like sentences and write coherent essays. Potential applications of ChatGPT in various domains, including healthcare, education, and research, are highlighted. Despite promising results, there are several privacy and ethical concerns surrounding ChatGPT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-27T14:26:29Z)
• Will ChatGPT get you caught? Rethinking of Plagiarism Detection [0.0]
  The rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology and its impact on education has been a topic of growing concern in recent years. The use of chatbots, particularly ChatGPT, for generating academic essays has sparked fears among scholars. This study aims to explore the originality of contents produced by one of the most popular AI chatbots, ChatGPT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-08T20:59:18Z)
• A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failures [47.64219291655723]
  ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, has been trained using massive amounts of data and simulates human conversation. It has garnered significant attention due to its ability to effectively answer a broad range of human inquiries. However, a comprehensive analysis of ChatGPT's failures is lacking, which is the focus of this study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T04:21:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.