PaperCard for Reporting Machine Assistance in Academic Writing
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.04824v1
- Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2023 14:28:04 GMT
- Title: PaperCard for Reporting Machine Assistance in Academic Writing
- Authors: Won Ik Cho, Eunjung Cho, Kyunghyun Cho
- Abstract summary: ChatGPT, a question-answering system released by OpenAI in November 2022, has demonstrated a range of capabilities that could be utilised in producing academic papers.
This raises critical questions surrounding the concept of authorship in academia.
We propose a framework we name "PaperCard", a documentation for human authors to transparently declare the use of AI in their writing process.
- Score: 48.33722012818687
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Academic writing process has benefited from various technological
developments over the years including search engines, automatic translators,
and editing tools that review grammar and spelling mistakes. They have enabled
human writers to become more efficient in writing academic papers, for example
by helping with finding relevant literature more effectively and polishing
texts. While these developments have so far played a relatively assistive role,
recent advances in large-scale language models (LLMs) have enabled LLMs to play
a more major role in the writing process, such as coming up with research
questions and generating key contents. This raises critical questions
surrounding the concept of authorship in academia. ChatGPT, a
question-answering system released by OpenAI in November 2022, has demonstrated
a range of capabilities that could be utilised in producing academic papers.
The academic community will have to address relevant pressing questions,
including whether Artificial Intelligence (AI) should be merited authorship if
it made significant contributions in the writing process, or whether its use
should be restricted such that human authorship would not be undermined. In
this paper, we aim to address such questions, and propose a framework we name
"PaperCard", a documentation for human authors to transparently declare the use
of AI in their writing process.
Related papers
- "It was 80% me, 20% AI": Seeking Authenticity in Co-Writing with Large Language Models [97.22914355737676]
We examine whether and how writers want to preserve their authentic voice when co-writing with AI tools.
Our findings illuminate conceptions of authenticity in human-AI co-creation.
Readers' responses showed less concern about human-AI co-writing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-20T04:42:32Z) - The Impact of AI on Academic Research and Publishing [0.6144680854063939]
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies like ChatGPT have significantly impacted academic writing and publishing.
This paper examines ethical considerations surrounding the integration of AI into academia, focusing on the potential for this technology to be used for scholarly misconduct.
The findings highlight the need for collaborative approaches to AI usage among publishers, editors, reviewers, and authors to ensure that this technology is used ethically and productively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-10T04:10:18Z) - What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review? [173.8912784451817]
In modern science, peer review is widely used, yet it is hard, time-consuming, and prone to error.
Since the artifacts involved in peer review are largely text-based, Natural Language Processing has great potential to improve reviewing.
We detail each step of the process from manuscript submission to camera-ready revision, and discuss the associated challenges and opportunities for NLP assistance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-10T16:06:43Z) - Three Disclaimers for Safe Disclosure: A Cardwriter for Reporting the Use of Generative AI in Writing Process [4.358289251981747]
"Cardwriter" produces a short report for authors to declare their use of generative AI in their writing process.
The demo is available online at https://cardwriter.vercel.app.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-13T16:55:50Z) - Perceptions and Detection of AI Use in Manuscript Preparation for
Academic Journals [1.881901067333374]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have produced both excitement and worry about how AI will impact academic writing.
Authors of academic publications may decide to voluntarily disclose any AI tools they use to revise their manuscripts.
journals and conferences could begin mandating disclosure and/or turn to using detection services.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-19T06:04:46Z) - Techniques for supercharging academic writing with generative AI [0.0]
This Perspective maps out principles and methods for using generative artificial intelligence (AI) to elevate the quality and efficiency of academic writing.
We introduce a human-AI collaborative framework that delineates the rationale (why), process (how), and nature (what) of AI engagement in writing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-26T04:35:00Z) - The Future of AI-Assisted Writing [0.0]
We conduct a comparative user-study between such tools from an information retrieval lens: pull and push.
Our findings show that users welcome seamless assistance of AI in their writing.
Users also enjoyed the collaboration with AI-assisted writing tools and did not feel a lack of ownership.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-29T02:46:45Z) - The Semantic Reader Project: Augmenting Scholarly Documents through
AI-Powered Interactive Reading Interfaces [54.2590226904332]
We describe the Semantic Reader Project, a effort across multiple institutions to explore automatic creation of dynamic reading interfaces for research papers.
Ten prototype interfaces have been developed and more than 300 participants and real-world users have shown improved reading experiences.
We structure this paper around challenges scholars and the public face when reading research papers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-25T02:47:09Z) - Effidit: Your AI Writing Assistant [60.588370965898534]
Effidit is a digital writing assistant that facilitates users to write higher-quality text more efficiently by using artificial intelligence (AI) technologies.
In Effidit, we significantly expand the capacities of a writing assistant by providing functions in five categories: text completion, error checking, text polishing, keywords to sentences (K2S), and cloud input methods (cloud IME)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-03T02:24:45Z) - Neural Approaches to Conversational Information Retrieval [94.77863916314979]
A conversational information retrieval (CIR) system is an information retrieval (IR) system with a conversational interface.
Recent progress in deep learning has brought tremendous improvements in natural language processing (NLP) and conversational AI.
This book surveys recent advances in CIR, focusing on neural approaches that have been developed in the last few years.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-13T19:04:59Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.