On the culture of open access: the Sci-hub paradox

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.12349v1
• Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 07:50:56 GMT
• Title: On the culture of open access: the Sci-hub paradox
• Authors: Abdelghani Maddi (GEMASS), David Sapinho
• Abstract summary: Shadow libraries are online collections of copyrighted publications that have been made available for free without the permission of the copyright holders. This study shows that OA publications, including those in fully OA journals, receive more citations than their subscription-based counterparts. The introduction of a distinction between those accessible or not via the Scihub platform among subscription-based suggest that the generalization of its use cancels the positive effect of OA publishing.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Shadow libraries, also known as ''pirate libraries'', are online collections of copyrighted publications that have been made available for free without the permission of the copyright holders. They have gradually become key players of scientific knowledge dissemination, despite their illegality in most countries of the world. Many publishers and scientist-editors decry such libraries for their copyright infringement and loss of publication usage information, while some scholars and institutions support them, sometimes in a roundabout way, for their role in reducing inequalities of access to knowledge, particularly in low-income countries. Although there is a wealth of literature on shadow libraries, none of this have focused on its potential role in knowledge dissemination, through the open access movement. Here we analyze how shadow libraries can affect researchers' citation practices, highlighting some counter-intuitive findings about their impact on the Open Access Citation Advantage (OACA). Based on a large randomized sample, this study first shows that OA publications, including those in fully OA journals, receive more citations than their subscription-based counterparts do. However, the OACA has slightly decreased over the seven last years. The introduction of a distinction between those accessible or not via the Scihub platform among subscription-based suggest that the generalization of its use cancels the positive effect of OA publishing. The results show that publications in fully OA journals are victims of the success of Sci-hub. Thus, paradoxically, although Sci-hub may seem to facilitate access to scientific knowledge, it negatively affects the OA movement as a whole, by reducing the comparative advantage of OA publications in terms of visibility for researchers. The democratization of the use of Sci-hub may therefore lead to a vicious cycle, hindering efforts to develop full OA strategies without proposing a credible and sustainable alternative model for the dissemination of scientific knowledge.

Related papers

• Are We There Yet? Revealing the Risks of Utilizing Large Language Models in Scholarly Peer Review [66.73247554182376]
  Large language models (LLMs) have led to their integration into peer review. The unchecked adoption of LLMs poses significant risks to the integrity of the peer review system. We show that manipulating 5% of the reviews could potentially cause 12% of the papers to lose their position in the top 30% rankings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T16:55:03Z)
• Suspected Undeclared Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Academic Literature: An Analysis of the Academ-AI Dataset [0.0]
  Academ-AI documents examples of suspected undeclared AI usage in the academic literature. Undeclared AI seems to appear in journals with higher citation metrics and higher article processing charges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-20T21:29:36Z)
• Two scholarly publishing cultures? Open access drives a divergence in European academic publishing practices [0.0]
  This study empirically tests how universities and countries respond to shifts in the academic publishing landscape. New open access publishers challenge traditional publishing models, offering faster review times and broader accessibility. Our findings reveal a clear division in European publishing practices, with countries clustering into two groups distinguished by the ratio of publications in new open access journals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-09T20:54:08Z)
• Mapping the Increasing Use of LLMs in Scientific Papers [99.67983375899719]
  We conduct the first systematic, large-scale analysis across 950,965 papers published between January 2020 and February 2024 on the arXiv, bioRxiv, and Nature portfolio journals. Our findings reveal a steady increase in LLM usage, with the largest and fastest growth observed in Computer Science papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T17:45:15Z)
• The Semantic Reader Project: Augmenting Scholarly Documents through AI-Powered Interactive Reading Interfaces [54.2590226904332]
  We describe the Semantic Reader Project, a effort across multiple institutions to explore automatic creation of dynamic reading interfaces for research papers. Ten prototype interfaces have been developed and more than 300 participants and real-world users have shown improved reading experiences. We structure this paper around challenges scholars and the public face when reading research papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-25T02:47:09Z)
• The URW-KG: a Resource for Tackling the Underrepresentation of non-Western Writers [2.983639510410386]
  We present the Under-Represented Writers Knowledge Graph (URW-KG), a resource designed to explore and possibly amend this lack of representation. The integrated information encoded in the graph allows scholars and users to be more easily exposed to non-Western literary works and authors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-21T07:53:26Z)
• Geographic Citation Gaps in NLP Research [63.13508571014673]
  This work asks a series of questions on the relationship between geographical location and publication success. We first created a dataset of 70,000 papers from the ACL Anthology, extracted their meta-information, and generated their citation network. We show that not only are there substantial geographical disparities in paper acceptance and citation but also that these disparities persist even when controlling for a number of variables such as venue of publication and sub-field of NLP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-26T02:25:23Z)
• Digital Publishing Habits, Perceptions of Open Access Publishing and Other Access Publishing: Across Continents Survey Study [1.693200946453174]
  The research mainly focuses on the importance, need, and author preference for open access journals. As an independent researcher, developing countries and other impoverished countries, researchers can give the utmost importance to open access journals. The researcher publishing the manuscript is more important than the quality of the content also important in scholarly publication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T10:19:55Z)
• Which Factors are associated with Open Access Publishing? A Springer Nature Case Study [6.7076682695289485]
  We studied 522,411 articles published by Springer Nature. Authors eligible for APC waivers publish more in gold-OA journals than others. Authors eligible for an APC discount have the lowest ratio of OA publications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-17T11:06:44Z)
• Algorithmic Fairness Datasets: the Story so Far [68.45921483094705]
  Data-driven algorithms are studied in diverse domains to support critical decisions, directly impacting people's well-being. A growing community of researchers has been investigating the equity of existing algorithms and proposing novel ones, advancing the understanding of risks and opportunities of automated decision-making for historically disadvantaged populations. Progress in fair Machine Learning hinges on data, which can be appropriately used only if adequately documented. Unfortunately, the algorithmic fairness community suffers from a collective data documentation debt caused by a lack of information on specific resources (opacity) and scatteredness of available information (sparsity)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-03T17:25:46Z)
• A Measure of Research Taste [91.3755431537592]
  We present a citation-based measure that rewards both productivity and taste. The presented measure, CAP, balances the impact of publications and their quantity. We analyze the characteristics of CAP for highly-cited researchers in biology, computer science, economics, and physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-17T18:01:47Z)
• Explore, Discover and Learn: Unsupervised Discovery of State-Covering Skills [155.11646755470582]
  'Explore, Discover and Learn' (EDL) is an alternative approach to information-theoretic skill discovery. We show that EDL offers significant advantages, such as overcoming the coverage problem, reducing the dependence of learned skills on the initial state, and allowing the user to define a prior over which behaviors should be learned.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-10T10:49:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.