A Theory of Multimodal Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.12458v2
• Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 01:46:41 GMT
• Title: A Theory of Multimodal Learning
• Authors: Zhou Lu
• Abstract summary: The study of multimodality remains relatively under-explored within the field of machine learning. An intriguing finding is that a model trained on multiple modalities can outperform a finely-tuned unimodal model, even on unimodal tasks. This paper provides a theoretical framework that explains this phenomenon, by studying generalization properties of multimodal learning algorithms.
• Score: 3.4991031406102238
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Human perception of the empirical world involves recognizing the diverse appearances, or 'modalities', of underlying objects. Despite the longstanding consideration of this perspective in philosophy and cognitive science, the study of multimodality remains relatively under-explored within the field of machine learning. Nevertheless, current studies of multimodal machine learning are limited to empirical practices, lacking theoretical foundations beyond heuristic arguments. An intriguing finding from the practice of multimodal learning is that a model trained on multiple modalities can outperform a finely-tuned unimodal model, even on unimodal tasks. This paper provides a theoretical framework that explains this phenomenon, by studying generalization properties of multimodal learning algorithms. We demonstrate that multimodal learning allows for a superior generalization bound compared to unimodal learning, up to a factor of $O(\sqrt{n})$, where $n$ represents the sample size. Such advantage occurs when both connection and heterogeneity exist between the modalities.

Related papers

• On the Comparison between Multi-modal and Single-modal Contrastive Learning [50.74988548106031]
  We introduce a theoretical foundation for understanding the differences between multi-modal and single-modal contrastive learning. We identify the critical factor, which is the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), that impacts the generalizability in downstream tasks of both multi-modal and single-modal contrastive learning. Our analysis provides a unified framework that can characterize the optimization and generalization of both single-modal and multi-modal contrastive learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T06:21:17Z)
• On Stronger Computational Separations Between Multimodal and Unimodal Machine Learning [0.0]
  Lu (NeurIPS '23, ALT '24) introduces a theory of multimodal learning. In particular, Lu (ALT '24) shows a computational separation, which is relevant to textitworst-case instances of the learning task. We prove that under basic conditions, any given computational separation between average-case unimodal and multimodal learning tasks implies a corresponding cryptographic key agreement protocol.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T19:21:28Z)
• On the Computational Benefit of Multimodal Learning [3.4991031406102238]
  We show that, under certain conditions, multimodal learning can outpace unimodal learning exponentially in terms of computation. Specifically, we present a learning task that is NP-hard for unimodal learning but is solvable in time by a multimodal algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-25T00:20:50Z)
• Modality Influence in Multimodal Machine Learning [0.0]
  The study examines Multimodal Sentiment Analysis, Multimodal Emotion Recognition, Multimodal Hate Speech Recognition, and Multimodal Disease Detection. The research aims to identify the most influential modality or set of modalities for each task and draw conclusions for diverse multimodal classification tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-10T16:28:52Z)
• Identifiability Results for Multimodal Contrastive Learning [72.15237484019174]
  We show that it is possible to recover shared factors in a more general setup than the multi-view setting studied previously. Our work provides a theoretical basis for multimodal representation learning and explains in which settings multimodal contrastive learning can be effective in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-16T09:14:26Z)
• Foundations and Recent Trends in Multimodal Machine Learning: Principles, Challenges, and Open Questions [68.6358773622615]
  This paper provides an overview of the computational and theoretical foundations of multimodal machine learning. We propose a taxonomy of 6 core technical challenges: representation, alignment, reasoning, generation, transference, and quantification. Recent technical achievements will be presented through the lens of this taxonomy, allowing researchers to understand the similarities and differences across new approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-07T19:21:19Z)
• Multimodal foundation models are better simulators of the human brain [65.10501322822881]
  We present a newly-designed multimodal foundation model pre-trained on 15 million image-text pairs. We find that both visual and lingual encoders trained multimodally are more brain-like compared with unimodal ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-17T12:36:26Z)
• Causal Reasoning Meets Visual Representation Learning: A Prospective Study [117.08431221482638]
  Lack of interpretability, robustness, and out-of-distribution generalization are becoming the challenges of the existing visual models. Inspired by the strong inference ability of human-level agents, recent years have witnessed great effort in developing causal reasoning paradigms. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of this emerging field, attract attention, encourage discussions, bring to the forefront the urgency of developing novel causal reasoning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-26T02:22:28Z)
• What Makes Multimodal Learning Better than Single (Provably) [28.793128982222438]
  We show that learning with multiple modalities achieves a smaller population risk thanonly using its subset of modalities. This is the first theoretical treatment to capture important qualitative phenomenaobserved in real multimodal applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-08T17:20:02Z)
• Relating by Contrasting: A Data-efficient Framework for Multimodal Generative Models [86.9292779620645]
  We develop a contrastive framework for generative model learning, allowing us to train the model not just by the commonality between modalities, but by the distinction between "related" and "unrelated" multimodal data. Under our proposed framework, the generative model can accurately identify related samples from unrelated ones, making it possible to make use of the plentiful unlabeled, unpaired multimodal data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-02T15:08:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.