On the Computational Benefit of Multimodal Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.13782v2
• Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 04:36:25 GMT
• Title: On the Computational Benefit of Multimodal Learning
• Authors: Zhou Lu
• Abstract summary: We show that, under certain conditions, multimodal learning can outpace unimodal learning exponentially in terms of computation. Specifically, we present a learning task that is NP-hard for unimodal learning but is solvable in time by a multimodal algorithm.
• Score: 3.4991031406102238
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Human perception inherently operates in a multimodal manner. Similarly, as machines interpret the empirical world, their learning processes ought to be multimodal. The recent, remarkable successes in empirical multimodal learning underscore the significance of understanding this paradigm. Yet, a solid theoretical foundation for multimodal learning has eluded the field for some time. While a recent study by Lu (2023) has shown the superior sample complexity of multimodal learning compared to its unimodal counterpart, another basic question remains: does multimodal learning also offer computational advantages over unimodal learning? This work initiates a study on the computational benefit of multimodal learning. We demonstrate that, under certain conditions, multimodal learning can outpace unimodal learning exponentially in terms of computation. Specifically, we present a learning task that is NP-hard for unimodal learning but is solvable in polynomial time by a multimodal algorithm. Our construction is based on a novel modification to the intersection of two half-spaces problem.

Related papers

• On the Comparison between Multi-modal and Single-modal Contrastive Learning [50.74988548106031]
  We introduce a theoretical foundation for understanding the differences between multi-modal and single-modal contrastive learning. We identify the critical factor, which is the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), that impacts the generalizability in downstream tasks of both multi-modal and single-modal contrastive learning. Our analysis provides a unified framework that can characterize the optimization and generalization of both single-modal and multi-modal contrastive learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T06:21:17Z)
• MMPareto: Boosting Multimodal Learning with Innocent Unimodal Assistance [10.580712937465032]
  We identify the previously ignored gradient conflict between multimodal and unimodal learning objectives. We propose MMPareto algorithm, which could ensure a final gradient with direction common to all learning objectives. Our method is also expected to facilitate multi-task cases with a clear discrepancy in task difficulty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T01:19:13Z)
• On Stronger Computational Separations Between Multimodal and Unimodal Machine Learning [0.0]
  Lu (NeurIPS '23, ALT '24) introduces a theory of multimodal learning. In particular, Lu (ALT '24) shows a computational separation, which is relevant to textitworst-case instances of the learning task. We prove that under basic conditions, any given computational separation between average-case unimodal and multimodal learning tasks implies a corresponding cryptographic key agreement protocol.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T19:21:28Z)
• Multimodal Representation Learning by Alternating Unimodal Adaptation [73.15829571740866]
  We propose MLA (Multimodal Learning with Alternating Unimodal Adaptation) to overcome challenges where some modalities appear more dominant than others during multimodal learning. MLA reframes the conventional joint multimodal learning process by transforming it into an alternating unimodal learning process. It captures cross-modal interactions through a shared head, which undergoes continuous optimization across different modalities. Experiments are conducted on five diverse datasets, encompassing scenarios with complete modalities and scenarios with missing modalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-17T18:57:40Z)
• A Theory of Multimodal Learning [3.4991031406102238]
  The study of multimodality remains relatively under-explored within the field of machine learning. An intriguing finding is that a model trained on multiple modalities can outperform a finely-tuned unimodal model, even on unimodal tasks. This paper provides a theoretical framework that explains this phenomenon, by studying generalization properties of multimodal learning algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-21T20:05:49Z)
• Learning Unseen Modality Interaction [54.23533023883659]
  Multimodal learning assumes all modality combinations of interest are available during training to learn cross-modal correspondences. We pose the problem of unseen modality interaction and introduce a first solution. It exploits a module that projects the multidimensional features of different modalities into a common space with rich information preserved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-22T10:53:10Z)
• Identifiability Results for Multimodal Contrastive Learning [72.15237484019174]
  We show that it is possible to recover shared factors in a more general setup than the multi-view setting studied previously. Our work provides a theoretical basis for multimodal representation learning and explains in which settings multimodal contrastive learning can be effective in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-16T09:14:26Z)
• Multimodal foundation models are better simulators of the human brain [65.10501322822881]
  We present a newly-designed multimodal foundation model pre-trained on 15 million image-text pairs. We find that both visual and lingual encoders trained multimodally are more brain-like compared with unimodal ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-17T12:36:26Z)
• What Makes Multimodal Learning Better than Single (Provably) [28.793128982222438]
  We show that learning with multiple modalities achieves a smaller population risk thanonly using its subset of modalities. This is the first theoretical treatment to capture important qualitative phenomenaobserved in real multimodal applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-08T17:20:02Z)
• What is Multimodality? [13.922507071009958]
  We explain how the field uses outdated definitions of multimodality that prove unfit for the machine learning era. We propose a new task-relative definition of (multi)modality in the context of multimodal machine learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-10T19:14:07Z)
• Provably Efficient Exploration for Reinforcement Learning Using Unsupervised Learning [96.78504087416654]
  Motivated by the prevailing paradigm of using unsupervised learning for efficient exploration in reinforcement learning (RL) problems, we investigate when this paradigm is provably efficient. We present a general algorithmic framework that is built upon two components: an unsupervised learning algorithm and a noregret tabular RL algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-15T19:23:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.