User Experience Design Professionals' Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.15237v2
• Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 05:54:35 GMT
• Title: User Experience Design Professionals' Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence
• Authors: Jie Li, Hancheng Cao, Laura Lin, Youyang Hou, Ruihao Zhu, Abdallah El Ali
• Abstract summary: We interviewed 20 UX Designers, with diverse experience and across companies (startups to large enterprises). We found that experienced designers are confident in their originality, creativity, and empathic skills, and find GenAI's role as assistive. We discuss implications for human-GenAI collaboration, specifically copyright and ownership, human creativity and agency, and AI literacy and access.
• Score: 15.833434677266427
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Among creative professionals, Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has sparked excitement over its capabilities and fear over unanticipated consequences. How does GenAI impact User Experience Design (UXD) practice, and are fears warranted? We interviewed 20 UX Designers, with diverse experience and across companies (startups to large enterprises). We probed them to characterize their practices, and sample their attitudes, concerns, and expectations. We found that experienced designers are confident in their originality, creativity, and empathic skills, and find GenAI's role as assistive. They emphasized the unique human factors of "enjoyment" and "agency", where humans remain the arbiters of "AI alignment". However, skill degradation, job replacement, and creativity exhaustion can adversely impact junior designers. We discuss implications for human-GenAI collaboration, specifically copyright and ownership, human creativity and agency, and AI literacy and access. Through the lens of responsible and participatory AI, we contribute a deeper understanding of GenAI fears and opportunities for UXD.

Related papers

• Creativity in the Age of AI: Evaluating the Impact of Generative AI on Design Outputs and Designers' Creative Thinking [19.713133349166778]
  We asked participants to design advertisements both with and without GenAI support. Expert evaluators rated GenAI-supported designs as more creative and unconventional "weird" Native English speakers experienced reduced relaxation when using AI, whereas designers new to GenAI exhibited gains in divergent thinking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T19:23:34Z)
• "I Am the One and Only, Your Cyber BFF": Understanding the Impact of GenAI Requires Understanding the Impact of Anthropomorphic AI [55.99010491370177]
  We argue that we cannot thoroughly map the social impacts of generative AI without mapping the social impacts of anthropomorphic AI. anthropomorphic AI systems are increasingly prone to generating outputs that are perceived to be human-like.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T04:57:41Z)
• Teacher agency in the age of generative AI: towards a framework of hybrid intelligence for learning design [0.0]
  Generative AI (genAI) is being used in education for different purposes. From the teachers' perspective, genAI can support activities such as learning design. However, GenAI has the potential to negatively affect professional agency due to teachers' limited power.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-09T08:28:05Z)
• Can AI Be as Creative as Humans? [84.43873277557852]
  We prove in theory that AI can be as creative as humans under the condition that it can properly fit the data generated by human creators. The debate on AI's creativity is reduced into the question of its ability to fit a sufficient amount of data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-03T08:49:12Z)
• Generative artificial intelligence enhances creativity but reduces the diversity of novel content [0.0]
  Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) holds promise for humans to be more creative by offering new ideas, or less creative by anchoring on GenAI ideas. Access to GenAI ideas causes an increase in the writer's creativity with stories being evaluated as better written and more enjoyable. However, GenAI-enabled stories are more similar to each other than stories by humans alone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-01T11:20:36Z)
• Exploration with Principles for Diverse AI Supervision [88.61687950039662]
  Training large transformers using next-token prediction has given rise to groundbreaking advancements in AI. While this generative AI approach has produced impressive results, it heavily leans on human supervision. This strong reliance on human oversight poses a significant hurdle to the advancement of AI innovation. We propose a novel paradigm termed Exploratory AI (EAI) aimed at autonomously generating high-quality training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T07:03:39Z)
• Grasping AI: experiential exercises for designers [8.95562850825636]
  We investigate techniques for exploring and reflecting on the interactional affordances, the unique relational possibilities, and the wider social implications of AI systems. We find that exercises around metaphors and enactments make questions of training and learning, privacy and consent, autonomy and agency more tangible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T15:34:08Z)
• Agency and legibility for artists through Experiential AI [12.941266914933454]
  Experiential AI is an emerging research field that addresses the challenge of making AI tangible and explicit. We report on an empirical case study of an experiential AI system designed for creative data exploration. We discuss how experiential AI can increase legibility and agency for artists.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-04T11:00:07Z)
• Seamful XAI: Operationalizing Seamful Design in Explainable AI [59.89011292395202]
  Mistakes in AI systems are inevitable, arising from both technical limitations and sociotechnical gaps. We propose that seamful design can foster AI explainability by revealing sociotechnical and infrastructural mismatches. We explore this process with 43 AI practitioners and real end-users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-12T21:54:05Z)
• A User-Centred Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Human-Robot Interaction [70.11080854486953]
  We propose a user-centred framework for XAI that focuses on its social-interactive aspect. The framework aims to provide a structure for interactive XAI solutions thought for non-expert users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-27T09:56:23Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.