Creativity in the Age of AI: Evaluating the Impact of Generative AI on Design Outputs and Designers' Creative Thinking

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.00168v1
• Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 19:23:34 GMT
• Title: Creativity in the Age of AI: Evaluating the Impact of Generative AI on Design Outputs and Designers' Creative Thinking
• Authors: Yue Fu, Han Bin, Tony Zhou, Marx Wang, Yixin Chen, Zelia Gomes Da Costa Lai, Jacob O. Wobbrock, Alexis Hiniker,
• Abstract summary: We asked participants to design advertisements both with and without GenAI support. Expert evaluators rated GenAI-supported designs as more creative and unconventional "weird" Native English speakers experienced reduced relaxation when using AI, whereas designers new to GenAI exhibited gains in divergent thinking.
• Score: 19.713133349166778
• License:
• Abstract: As generative AI (GenAI) increasingly permeates design workflows, its impact on design outcomes and designers' creative capabilities warrants investigation. We conducted a within-subjects experiment where we asked participants to design advertisements both with and without GenAI support. Our results show that expert evaluators rated GenAI-supported designs as more creative and unconventional ("weird") despite no significant differences in visual appeal, brand alignment, or usefulness, which highlights the decoupling of novelty from usefulness-traditional dual components of creativity-in the context of GenAI usage. Moreover, while GenAI does not significantly enhance designers' overall creative thinking abilities, users were affected differently based on native language and prior AI exposure. Native English speakers experienced reduced relaxation when using AI, whereas designers new to GenAI exhibited gains in divergent thinking, such as idea fluency and flexibility. These findings underscore the variable impact of GenAI on different user groups, suggesting the potential for customized AI tools.

Related papers

• Model-based Maintenance and Evolution with GenAI: A Look into the Future [47.93555901495955]
  We argue that Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) can be used as a means to address the limitations of Model-Based Engineering (MBM&E) We propose that GenAI can be used in MBM&E for: reducing engineers' learning curve, maximizing efficiency with recommendations, or serving as a reasoning tool to understand domain problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-09T23:13:26Z)
• The Influencer Next Door: How Misinformation Creators Use GenAI [1.1650821883155187]
  We find that non-experts increasingly use GenAI to remix, repackage, and (re)produce content to meet their personal needs and desires. We analyze how these understudied emergent uses of GenAI produce new or accelerated misinformation harms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T11:40:22Z)
• Prompt Smells: An Omen for Undesirable Generative AI Outputs [4.105236597768038]
  We propose two new concepts that will aid the research community in addressing limitations associated with the application of GenAI models. First, we propose a definition for the "desirability" of GenAI outputs and three factors which are observed to influence it. Second, drawing inspiration from Martin Fowler's code smells, we propose the concept of "prompt smells" and the adverse effects they are observed to have on the desirability of GenAI outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-23T10:10:01Z)
• Can AI Be as Creative as Humans? [84.43873277557852]
  We prove in theory that AI can be as creative as humans under the condition that it can properly fit the data generated by human creators. The debate on AI's creativity is reduced into the question of its ability to fit a sufficient amount of data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-03T08:49:12Z)
• Generative artificial intelligence enhances creativity but reduces the diversity of novel content [0.0]
  Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) holds promise for humans to be more creative by offering new ideas, or less creative by anchoring on GenAI ideas. Access to GenAI ideas causes an increase in the writer's creativity with stories being evaluated as better written and more enjoyable. However, GenAI-enabled stories are more similar to each other than stories by humans alone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-01T11:20:36Z)
• Exploration with Principles for Diverse AI Supervision [88.61687950039662]
  Training large transformers using next-token prediction has given rise to groundbreaking advancements in AI. While this generative AI approach has produced impressive results, it heavily leans on human supervision. This strong reliance on human oversight poses a significant hurdle to the advancement of AI innovation. We propose a novel paradigm termed Exploratory AI (EAI) aimed at autonomously generating high-quality training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T07:03:39Z)
• User Experience Design Professionals' Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence [15.833434677266427]
  We interviewed 20 UX Designers, with diverse experience and across companies (startups to large enterprises). We found that experienced designers are confident in their originality, creativity, and empathic skills, and find GenAI's role as assistive. We discuss implications for human-GenAI collaboration, specifically copyright and ownership, human creativity and agency, and AI literacy and access.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-26T20:04:30Z)
• Seamful XAI: Operationalizing Seamful Design in Explainable AI [59.89011292395202]
  Mistakes in AI systems are inevitable, arising from both technical limitations and sociotechnical gaps. We propose that seamful design can foster AI explainability by revealing sociotechnical and infrastructural mismatches. We explore this process with 43 AI practitioners and real end-users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-12T21:54:05Z)
• Investigating Explainability of Generative AI for Code through Scenario-based Design [44.44517254181818]
  generative AI (GenAI) technologies are maturing and being applied to application domains such as software engineering. We conduct 9 workshops with 43 software engineers in which real examples from state-of-the-art generative AI models were used to elicit users' explainability needs. Our work explores explainability needs for GenAI for code and demonstrates how human-centered approaches can drive the technical development of XAI in novel domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-10T08:52:39Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.