Towards Best Practices of Activation Patching in Language Models: Metrics and Methods

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.16042v2
• Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 04:07:06 GMT
• Title: Towards Best Practices of Activation Patching in Language Models: Metrics and Methods
• Authors: Fred Zhang and Neel Nanda
• Abstract summary: We examine the impact of methodological details in activation patching, including evaluation metrics and corruption methods. Backed by empirical observations, we give conceptual arguments for why certain metrics or methods may be preferred.
• Score: 9.121998462494533
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Mechanistic interpretability seeks to understand the internal mechanisms of machine learning models, where localization -- identifying the important model components -- is a key step. Activation patching, also known as causal tracing or interchange intervention, is a standard technique for this task (Vig et al., 2020), but the literature contains many variants with little consensus on the choice of hyperparameters or methodology. In this work, we systematically examine the impact of methodological details in activation patching, including evaluation metrics and corruption methods. In several settings of localization and circuit discovery in language models, we find that varying these hyperparameters could lead to disparate interpretability results. Backed by empirical observations, we give conceptual arguments for why certain metrics or methods may be preferred. Finally, we provide recommendations for the best practices of activation patching going forwards.

Related papers

• Merging Language and Domain Specific Models: The Impact on Technical Vocabulary Acquisition [0.0]
  We explore the knowledge transfer mechanisms involved when combining a general-purpose language-specific model with a domain-specific model. Our experiments analyze the impact of this merging process on the target model's proficiency in handling specialized terminology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T16:39:28Z)
• The Geometry of Prompting: Unveiling Distinct Mechanisms of Task Adaptation in Language Models [40.128112851978116]
  We study how different prompting methods affect the geometry of representations in language models. Our analysis highlights the critical role of input distribution samples and label semantics in few-shot in-context learning. Our work contributes to the theoretical understanding of large language models and lays the groundwork for developing more effective, representation-aware prompting strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T23:09:50Z)
• A Thorough Examination of Decoding Methods in the Era of LLMs [72.65956436513241]
  Decoding methods play an indispensable role in converting language models from next-token predictors into practical task solvers. This paper provides a comprehensive and multifaceted analysis of various decoding methods within the context of large language models. Our findings reveal that decoding method performance is notably task-dependent and influenced by factors such as alignment, model size, and quantization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-10T11:14:53Z)
• Seeking Neural Nuggets: Knowledge Transfer in Large Language Models from a Parametric Perspective [106.92016199403042]
  We empirically investigate knowledge transfer from larger to smaller models through a parametric perspective. We employ sensitivity-based techniques to extract and align knowledge-specific parameters between different large language models. Our findings highlight the critical factors contributing to the process of parametric knowledge transfer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T17:58:34Z)
• Generalization Properties of Retrieval-based Models [50.35325326050263]
  Retrieval-based machine learning methods have enjoyed success on a wide range of problems. Despite growing literature showcasing the promise of these models, the theoretical underpinning for such models remains underexplored. We present a formal treatment of retrieval-based models to characterize their generalization ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-06T00:33:01Z)
• MACE: An Efficient Model-Agnostic Framework for Counterfactual Explanation [132.77005365032468]
  We propose a novel framework of Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanation (MACE) In our MACE approach, we propose a novel RL-based method for finding good counterfactual examples and a gradient-less descent method for improving proximity. Experiments on public datasets validate the effectiveness with better validity, sparsity and proximity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-31T04:57:06Z)
• Towards a Unified View of Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning [108.94786930869473]
  Fine-tuning large pre-trained language models on downstream tasks has become the de-facto learning paradigm in NLP. Recent work has proposed a variety of parameter-efficient transfer learning methods that only fine-tune a small number of (extra) parameters to attain strong performance. We break down the design of state-of-the-art parameter-efficient transfer learning methods and present a unified framework that establishes connections between them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-08T20:22:26Z)
• Interpretable Multi-dataset Evaluation for Named Entity Recognition [110.64368106131062]
  We present a general methodology for interpretable evaluation for the named entity recognition (NER) task. The proposed evaluation method enables us to interpret the differences in models and datasets, as well as the interplay between them. By making our analysis tool available, we make it easy for future researchers to run similar analyses and drive progress in this area.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-13T10:53:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.