Robust Offline Reinforcement Learning -- Certify the Confidence Interval

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.16631v2
• Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 02:28:21 GMT
• Title: Robust Offline Reinforcement Learning -- Certify the Confidence Interval
• Abstract summary: We develop an algorithm to certify the robustness of a given policy offline with random smoothing. Experiments on different environments confirm the correctness of our algorithm.
• Score: 15.464948077412025
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Currently, reinforcement learning (RL), especially deep RL, has received more and more attention in the research area. However, the security of RL has been an obvious problem due to the attack manners becoming mature. In order to defend against such adversarial attacks, several practical approaches are developed, such as adversarial training, data filtering, etc. However, these methods are mostly based on empirical algorithms and experiments, without rigorous theoretical analysis of the robustness of the algorithms. In this paper, we develop an algorithm to certify the robustness of a given policy offline with random smoothing, which could be proven and conducted as efficiently as ones without random smoothing. Experiments on different environments confirm the correctness of our algorithm.

Related papers

• Robust off-policy Reinforcement Learning via Soft Constrained Adversary [0.7583052519127079]
  We introduce an f-divergence constrained problem with the prior knowledge distribution. We derive two typical attacks and their corresponding robust learning frameworks. Results demonstrate that our proposed methods achieve excellent performance in sample-efficient off-policy RL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-31T11:13:33Z)
• Risk-Sensitive Soft Actor-Critic for Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning under Distribution Shifts [11.765000124617186]
  We study the robustness of deep reinforcement learning algorithms against distribution shifts within contextual multi-stage optimization problems. We show that our algorithm is superior to risk-neutral Soft Actor-Critic as well as to two benchmark approaches for robust deep reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T14:55:38Z)
• Exploiting Estimation Bias in Clipped Double Q-Learning for Continous Control Reinforcement Learning Tasks [5.968716050740402]
  This paper focuses on addressing and exploiting estimation biases in Actor-Critic methods for continuous control tasks. We design a Bias Exploiting (BE) mechanism to dynamically select the most advantageous estimation bias during training of the RL agent. Most State-of-the-art Deep RL algorithms can be equipped with the BE mechanism, without hindering performance or computational complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T10:44:03Z)
• Doubly Robust Instance-Reweighted Adversarial Training [107.40683655362285]
  We propose a novel doubly-robust instance reweighted adversarial framework. Our importance weights are obtained by optimizing the KL-divergence regularized loss function. Our proposed approach outperforms related state-of-the-art baseline methods in terms of average robust performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-01T06:16:18Z)
• Iteratively Refined Behavior Regularization for Offline Reinforcement Learning [57.10922880400715]
  In this paper, we propose a new algorithm that substantially enhances behavior-regularization based on conservative policy iteration. By iteratively refining the reference policy used for behavior regularization, conservative policy update guarantees gradually improvement. Experimental results on the D4RL benchmark indicate that our method outperforms previous state-of-the-art baselines in most tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T07:46:24Z)
• A Strong Baseline for Batch Imitation Learning [25.392006064406967]
  We provide an easy-to-implement, novel algorithm for imitation learning under a strict data paradigm. This paradigm allows our algorithm to be used for environments in which safety or cost are of critical concern.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T14:03:33Z)
• Instance-Dependent Confidence and Early Stopping for Reinforcement Learning [99.57168572237421]
  Various algorithms for reinforcement learning (RL) exhibit dramatic variation in their convergence rates as a function of problem structure. This research provides guarantees that explain textitex post the performance differences observed. A natural next step is to convert these theoretical guarantees into guidelines that are useful in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-21T04:25:35Z)
• Policy Smoothing for Provably Robust Reinforcement Learning [109.90239627115336]
  We study the provable robustness of reinforcement learning against norm-bounded adversarial perturbations of the inputs. We generate certificates that guarantee that the total reward obtained by the smoothed policy will not fall below a certain threshold under a norm-bounded adversarial of perturbation the input.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-21T21:42:08Z)
• Uncertainty Weighted Actor-Critic for Offline Reinforcement Learning [63.53407136812255]
  Offline Reinforcement Learning promises to learn effective policies from previously-collected, static datasets without the need for exploration. Existing Q-learning and actor-critic based off-policy RL algorithms fail when bootstrapping from out-of-distribution (OOD) actions or states. We propose Uncertainty Weighted Actor-Critic (UWAC), an algorithm that detects OOD state-action pairs and down-weights their contribution in the training objectives accordingly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-17T20:16:46Z)
• Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning through Adversarial Loss [74.20501663956604]
  Recent studies have shown that deep reinforcement learning agents are vulnerable to small adversarial perturbations on the agent's inputs. We propose RADIAL-RL, a principled framework to train reinforcement learning agents with improved robustness against adversarial attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-05T07:49:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.