Pairwise Proximal Policy Optimization: Harnessing Relative Feedback for LLM Alignment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.00212v3
• Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 02:32:08 GMT
• Title: Pairwise Proximal Policy Optimization: Harnessing Relative Feedback for LLM Alignment
• Authors: Tianhao Wu, Banghua Zhu, Ruoyu Zhang, Zhaojin Wen, Kannan Ramchandran, Jiantao Jiao
• Abstract summary: This paper proposes a new framework, reinforcement learning with relative feedback, and a novel trajectory-wise policy gradient algorithm. We show theoretically that P3O is invariant to equivalent rewards and avoids the complexity of PPO. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that P3O outperforms PPO in the KL-Reward trade-off and can align with human preferences as well as or better than prior methods.
• Score: 37.52249093928251
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) can acquire extensive world knowledge through pre-training on large corpora. However, due to exposure to low-quality data, LLMs may exhibit harmful behavior without aligning with human values. The dominant approach for steering LLMs towards beneficial behavior involves Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF), with Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) serving as the default RL optimizer. Despite its effectiveness, PPO has limitations when optimizing rewards trained from comparison-based loss. Primarily, PPO is not invariant to equivalent reward functions containing identical preference information due to the need to calibrate the reward scale. Additionally, PPO's necessity for token-wise updates introduces complexity in both function approximation and algorithm design compared to trajectory-wise optimization. This paper proposes a new framework, reinforcement learning with relative feedback, and a novel trajectory-wise policy gradient algorithm, Pairwise Proximal Policy Optimization (P3O) that operates directly on comparative rewards. We show theoretically that P3O is invariant to equivalent rewards and avoids the complexity of PPO. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that P3O outperforms PPO in the KL-Reward trade-off and can align with human preferences as well as or better than prior methods. In summary, this work introduces a simpler yet effective approach for aligning LLMs to human preferences through relative feedback.

Related papers

• TIS-DPO: Token-level Importance Sampling for Direct Preference Optimization With Estimated Weights [73.9088920210495]
  We propose a token-level importance sampling DPO objective named TIS-DPO that assigns importance weights to each token based on its reward. TIS-DPO significantly outperforms various baseline methods on harmlessness and helpfulness alignment and summarization tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T04:03:00Z)
• Minor DPO reject penalty to increase training robustness [8.971332948872185]
  Learning from human preference is a paradigm used in large-scale language model (LLM) fine-tuning step to better align pretrained LLM to human preference for downstream task. Recently, Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has been proposed to solve the alignment problem with a simplified RL-free method. In this article, we analyze the working mechanism of $beta$ in DPO, disclose its syntax difference between RL algorithm and DPO, and understand the potential shortage brought by the DPO simplification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T09:29:31Z)
• Contrastive Policy Gradient: Aligning LLMs on sequence-level scores in a supervised-friendly fashion [44.95386817008473]
  We introduce Contrastive Policy Gradient, or CoPG, a simple and mathematically principled new RL algorithm that can estimate the optimal policy even from off-policy data. We show this approach to generalize the direct alignment method IPO (identity preference optimization) and classic policy gradient. We experiment with the proposed CoPG on a toy bandit problem to illustrate its properties, as well as for finetuning LLMs on a summarization task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T14:03:49Z)
• Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial Regularizer [52.09480867526656]
  We identify the source of misalignment as a form of distributional shift and uncertainty in learning human preferences. To mitigate overoptimization, we first propose a theoretical algorithm that chooses the best policy for an adversarially chosen reward model. Using the equivalence between reward models and the corresponding optimal policy, the algorithm features a simple objective that combines a preference optimization loss and a supervised learning loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T05:38:50Z)
• Value Augmented Sampling for Language Model Alignment and Personalization [39.070662999014836]
  We present a new framework for reward optimization, Value Augmented Sampling (VAS) VAS solves for the optimal reward-maximizing policy without co-training the policy and the value function. Our algorithm unlocks the new capability of composing several rewards and controlling the extent of each one during deployment time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T17:59:04Z)
• REBEL: Reinforcement Learning via Regressing Relative Rewards [59.68420022466047]
  We propose REBEL, a minimalist RL algorithm for the era of generative models. In theory, we prove that fundamental RL algorithms like Natural Policy Gradient can be seen as variants of REBEL. We find that REBEL provides a unified approach to language modeling and image generation with stronger or similar performance as PPO and DPO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-25T17:20:45Z)
• Fine-Tuning Language Models with Reward Learning on Policy [68.70065254564642]
  Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has emerged as an effective approach to aligning large language models (LLMs) to human preferences. Despite its popularity, (fixed) reward models may suffer from inaccurate off-distribution. We propose reward learning on policy (RLP), an unsupervised framework that refines a reward model using policy samples to keep it on-distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T10:02:10Z)
• Preference as Reward, Maximum Preference Optimization with Importance Sampling [3.7040071165219595]
  We propose a simple and intuitive off-policy preference optimization algorithm from an importance sampling view, which we call Maximum Preference Optimization (MPO) MPO achieves the best of both worlds by combining the objectives of RLHF and IPO while being an off-policy algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-27T06:34:54Z)
• Nash Learning from Human Feedback [86.09617990412941]
  We introduce an alternative pipeline for the fine-tuning of large language models using pairwise human feedback. We term this approach Nash learning from human feedback (NLHF) We present a novel algorithmic solution, Nash-MD, founded on the principles of mirror descent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-01T19:26:23Z)
• Fine-Tuning Language Models with Advantage-Induced Policy Alignment [80.96507425217472]
  We propose a novel algorithm for aligning large language models to human preferences. We show that it consistently outperforms PPO in language tasks by a large margin. We also provide a theoretical justification supporting the design of our loss function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-04T01:59:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.