When Should a Leader Act Suboptimally? The Role of Inferability in Repeated Stackelberg Games

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.00468v2
• Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:46:51 GMT
• Title: When Should a Leader Act Suboptimally? The Role of Inferability in Repeated Stackelberg Games
• Authors: Mustafa O. Karabag, Sophia Smith, Negar Mehr, David Fridovich-Keil, Ufuk Topcu,
• Abstract summary: We model the inferability problem using Stackelberg games with observations where a leader and a follower repeatedly interact. For a variety of game settings, we show that the inferability gap is upper-bounded by a function of the number of interactions and theity level of the leader's strategy. We identify a set of games where the leader's near-optimal strategy may suffer from a large inferability gap.
• Score: 28.856644679990357
• License:
• Abstract: When interacting with other decision-making agents in non-adversarial scenarios, it is critical for an autonomous agent to have inferable behavior: The agent's actions must convey their intention and strategy. We model the inferability problem using Stackelberg games with observations where a leader and a follower repeatedly interact. During the interactions, the leader uses a fixed mixed strategy. The follower does not know the leader's strategy and dynamically reacts to the statistically inferred strategy based on the leader's previous actions. In the inference setting, the leader may have a lower performance compared to the setting where the follower has full information on the leader's strategy. We refer to the performance gap between these settings as the inferability gap. For a variety of game settings, we show that the inferability gap is upper-bounded by a function of the number of interactions and the stochasticity level of the leader's strategy, encouraging the use of inferable strategies with lower stochasticity levels. We also analyze bimatrix Stackelberg games and identify a set of games where the leader's near-optimal strategy may suffer from a large inferability gap.

Related papers

• Decentralized Online Learning in General-Sum Stackelberg Games [2.8659922790025463]
  We study an online learning problem in general-sum Stackelberg games, where players act in a decentralized and strategic manner. We show that for the follower, myopically best responding to the leader's action is the best strategy for the limited information setting. We design a new manipulation strategy for the follower in the latter setting, and show that it has an intrinsic advantage against the best response strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-06T04:35:01Z)
• Regret Minimization in Stackelberg Games with Side Information [44.72865997906019]
  We formalize settings for Stackelberg games in which both players observe an external context before playing. In sharp contrast to the non-context version, we show that it is impossible for the leader to achieve no-regret in the full adversarial setting. Motivated by this result, we show that no-regret learning is possible in two natural relaxations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T16:24:57Z)
• Actions Speak What You Want: Provably Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning of the Quantal Stackelberg Equilibrium from Strategic Feedbacks [94.07688076435818]
  We study reinforcement learning for learning a Quantal Stackelberg Equilibrium (QSE) in an episodic Markov game with a leader-follower structure. Our algorithms are based on (i) learning the quantal response model via maximum likelihood estimation and (ii) model-free or model-based RL for solving the leader's decision making problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-26T10:24:17Z)
• Online Learning in Stackelberg Games with an Omniscient Follower [83.42564921330896]
  We study the problem of online learning in a two-player decentralized cooperative Stackelberg game. In each round, the leader first takes an action, followed by the follower who takes their action after observing the leader's move. We show that depending on the reward structure, the existence of the omniscient follower may change the sample complexity drastically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-27T03:35:10Z)
• No-Regret Learning in Dynamic Stackelberg Games [31.001205916012307]
  In a Stackelberg game, a leader commits to a randomized strategy, and a follower chooses their best strategy in response. We consider an extension of a standard Stackelberg game, called a discrete-time dynamic Stackelberg game, that has an underlying state space that affects the leader's rewards and available strategies and evolves in a Markovian manner depending on both the leader and follower's selected strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-10T01:07:57Z)
• Who Leads and Who Follows in Strategic Classification? [82.44386576129295]
  We argue that the order of play in strategic classification is fundamentally determined by the relative frequencies at which the decision-maker and the agents adapt to each other's actions. We show that a decision-maker with the freedom to choose their update frequency can induce learning dynamics that converge to Stackelberg equilibria with either order of play.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-23T16:48:46Z)
• Adversarial Training as Stackelberg Game: An Unrolled Optimization Approach [91.74682538906691]
  Adversarial training has been shown to improve the generalization performance of deep learning models. We propose Stackelberg Adversarial Training (SALT), which formulates adversarial training as a Stackelberg game.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-11T00:44:57Z)
• Efficient exploration of zero-sum stochastic games [83.28949556413717]
  We investigate the increasingly important and common game-solving setting where we do not have an explicit description of the game but only oracle access to it through gameplay. During a limited-duration learning phase, the algorithm can control the actions of both players in order to try to learn the game and how to play it well. Our motivation is to quickly learn strategies that have low exploitability in situations where evaluating the payoffs of a queried strategy profile is costly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-24T20:30:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.