Generating Explanations in Medical Question-Answering by Expectation Maximization Inference over Evidence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.01299v1
• Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 16:00:37 GMT
• Title: Generating Explanations in Medical Question-Answering by Expectation Maximization Inference over Evidence
• Authors: Wei Sun, Mingxiao Li, Damien Sileo, Jesse Davis, and Marie-Francine Moens
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel approach for generating natural language explanations for answers predicted by medical QA systems. Our system extract knowledge from medical textbooks to enhance the quality of explanations during the explanation generation process.
• Score: 33.018873142559286
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Medical Question Answering~(medical QA) systems play an essential role in assisting healthcare workers in finding answers to their questions. However, it is not sufficient to merely provide answers by medical QA systems because users might want explanations, that is, more analytic statements in natural language that describe the elements and context that support the answer. To do so, we propose a novel approach for generating natural language explanations for answers predicted by medical QA systems. As high-quality medical explanations require additional medical knowledge, so that our system extract knowledge from medical textbooks to enhance the quality of explanations during the explanation generation process. Concretely, we designed an expectation-maximization approach that makes inferences about the evidence found in these texts, offering an efficient way to focus attention on lengthy evidence passages. Experimental results, conducted on two datasets MQAE-diag and MQAE, demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework for reasoning with textual evidence. Our approach outperforms state-of-the-art models, achieving a significant improvement of \textbf{6.86} and \textbf{9.43} percentage points on the Rouge-1 score; \textbf{8.23} and \textbf{7.82} percentage points on the Bleu-4 score on the respective datasets.

Related papers

• Tri-VQA: Triangular Reasoning Medical Visual Question Answering for Multi-Attribute Analysis [4.964280449393689]
  We investigate the construction of a more cohesive and stable Med-VQA structure. Motivated by causal effect, we propose a novel Triangular Reasoning VQA framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T10:50:55Z)
• InfoLossQA: Characterizing and Recovering Information Loss in Text Simplification [60.10193972862099]
  This work proposes a framework to characterize and recover simplification-induced information loss in form of question-and-answer pairs. QA pairs are designed to help readers deepen their knowledge of a text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T19:00:01Z)
• Explanatory Argument Extraction of Correct Answers in Resident Medical Exams [5.399800035598185]
  We present a new dataset which includes not only explanatory arguments for the correct answer, but also arguments to reason why the incorrect answers are not correct. This new benchmark allows us to setup a novel extractive task which consists of identifying the explanation of the correct answer written by medical doctors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-01T13:22:35Z)
• Medical Question Summarization with Entity-driven Contrastive Learning [12.008269098530386]
  This paper proposes a novel medical question summarization framework using entity-driven contrastive learning (ECL) ECL employs medical entities in frequently asked questions (FAQs) as focuses and devises an effective mechanism to generate hard negative samples. We find that some MQA datasets suffer from serious data leakage problems, such as the iCliniq dataset's 33% duplicate rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-15T00:19:03Z)
• Informing clinical assessment by contextualizing post-hoc explanations of risk prediction models in type-2 diabetes [50.8044927215346]
  We consider a comorbidity risk prediction scenario and focus on contexts regarding the patients clinical state. We employ several state-of-the-art LLMs to present contexts around risk prediction model inferences and evaluate their acceptability. Our paper is one of the first end-to-end analyses identifying the feasibility and benefits of contextual explanations in a real-world clinical use case.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-11T18:07:11Z)
• Medical Question Understanding and Answering with Knowledge Grounding and Semantic Self-Supervision [53.692793122749414]
  We introduce a medical question understanding and answering system with knowledge grounding and semantic self-supervision. Our system is a pipeline that first summarizes a long, medical, user-written question, using a supervised summarization loss. The system first matches the summarized user question with an FAQ from a trusted medical knowledge base, and then retrieves a fixed number of relevant sentences from the corresponding answer document.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T08:20:32Z)
• Medical Visual Question Answering: A Survey [55.53205317089564]
  Medical Visual Question Answering(VQA) is a combination of medical artificial intelligence and popular VQA challenges. Given a medical image and a clinically relevant question in natural language, the medical VQA system is expected to predict a plausible and convincing answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-19T05:55:15Z)
• Medical Knowledge-enriched Textual Entailment Framework [5.493804101940195]
  We present a novel Medical Knowledge-Enriched Textual Entailment framework. We evaluate our framework on the benchmark MEDIQA-RQE dataset and manifest that the use of knowledge enriched dual-encoding mechanism help in achieving an absolute improvement of 8.27% over SOTA language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-10T17:25:27Z)
• Interpretable Multi-Step Reasoning with Knowledge Extraction on Complex Healthcare Question Answering [89.76059961309453]
  HeadQA dataset contains multiple-choice questions authorized for the public healthcare specialization exam. These questions are the most challenging for current QA systems. We present a Multi-step reasoning with Knowledge extraction framework (MurKe) We are striving to make full use of off-the-shelf pre-trained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-06T02:47:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.