Probing Intersectional Biases in Vision-Language Models with Counterfactual Examples

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.02988v1
• Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 17:25:10 GMT
• Title: Probing Intersectional Biases in Vision-Language Models with Counterfactual Examples
• Authors: Phillip Howard, Avinash Madasu, Tiep Le, Gustavo Lujan Moreno, Vasudev Lal
• Abstract summary: We employ text-to-image diffusion models to produce counterfactual examples for probing intserctional social biases at scale. Our approach utilizes Stable Diffusion with cross attention control to produce sets of counterfactual image-text pairs. We conduct extensive experiments using our generated dataset which reveal the intersectional social biases present in state-of-the-art VLMs.
• Score: 5.870913541790421
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: While vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved remarkable performance improvements recently, there is growing evidence that these models also posses harmful biases with respect to social attributes such as gender and race. Prior studies have primarily focused on probing such bias attributes individually while ignoring biases associated with intersections between social attributes. This could be due to the difficulty of collecting an exhaustive set of image-text pairs for various combinations of social attributes from existing datasets. To address this challenge, we employ text-to-image diffusion models to produce counterfactual examples for probing intserctional social biases at scale. Our approach utilizes Stable Diffusion with cross attention control to produce sets of counterfactual image-text pairs that are highly similar in their depiction of a subject (e.g., a given occupation) while differing only in their depiction of intersectional social attributes (e.g., race & gender). We conduct extensive experiments using our generated dataset which reveal the intersectional social biases present in state-of-the-art VLMs.

Related papers

• VLBiasBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Bias in Large Vision-Language Model [72.13121434085116]
  VLBiasBench is a benchmark aimed at evaluating biases in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) We construct a dataset encompassing nine distinct categories of social biases, including age, disability status, gender, nationality, physical appearance, race, religion, profession, social economic status and two intersectional bias categories (race x gender, and race x social economic status) We conduct extensive evaluations on 15 open-source models as well as one advanced closed-source model, providing some new insights into the biases revealing from these models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T10:56:59Z)
• MIST: Mitigating Intersectional Bias with Disentangled Cross-Attention Editing in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models [3.3454373538792552]
  We introduce a method that addresses intersectional bias in diffusion-based text-to-image models by modifying cross-attention maps in a disentangled manner. Our approach utilizes a pre-trained Stable Diffusion model, eliminates the need for an additional set of reference images, and preserves the original quality for unaltered concepts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T17:54:38Z)
• SocialCounterfactuals: Probing and Mitigating Intersectional Social Biases in Vision-Language Models with Counterfactual Examples [6.084482865688909]
  We employ text-to-image diffusion models to produce counterfactual examples for probing intersectional social biases at scale. Our approach utilizes Stable Diffusion with cross attention control to produce sets of counterfactual image-text pairs. We produce SocialCounterfactuals, a high-quality dataset containing 171k image-text pairs for probing intersectional biases related to gender, race, and physical characteristics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-30T18:32:14Z)
• Social Bias Probing: Fairness Benchmarking for Language Models [38.180696489079985]
  This paper proposes a novel framework for probing language models for social biases by assessing disparate treatment. We curate SoFa, a large-scale benchmark designed to address the limitations of existing fairness collections. We show that biases within language models are more nuanced than acknowledged, indicating a broader scope of encoded biases than previously recognized.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T16:35:59Z)
• Balancing the Picture: Debiasing Vision-Language Datasets with Synthetic Contrast Sets [52.77024349608834]
  Vision-language models can perpetuate and amplify societal biases learned during pre-training on uncurated image-text pairs from the internet. COCO Captions is the most commonly used dataset for evaluating bias between background context and the gender of people in-situ. We propose a novel dataset debiasing pipeline to augment the COCO dataset with synthetic, gender-balanced contrast sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T17:59:18Z)
• Fairness in AI Systems: Mitigating gender bias from language-vision models [0.913755431537592]
  We study the extent of the impact of gender bias in existing datasets. We propose a methodology to mitigate its impact in caption based language vision models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-03T04:33:44Z)
• Stable Bias: Analyzing Societal Representations in Diffusion Models [72.27121528451528]
  We propose a new method for exploring the social biases in Text-to-Image (TTI) systems. Our approach relies on characterizing the variation in generated images triggered by enumerating gender and ethnicity markers in the prompts. We leverage this method to analyze images generated by 3 popular TTI systems and find that while all of their outputs show correlations with US labor demographics, they also consistently under-represent marginalized identities to different extents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-20T19:32:49Z)
• DeAR: Debiasing Vision-Language Models with Additive Residuals [5.672132510411465]
  Large pre-trained vision-language models (VLMs) provide rich, adaptable image and text representations. These models suffer from societal biases owing to the skewed distribution of various identity groups in the training data. We present DeAR, a novel debiasing method that learns additive residual image representations to offset the original representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-18T14:57:43Z)
• Auditing Gender Presentation Differences in Text-to-Image Models [54.16959473093973]
  We study how gender is presented differently in text-to-image models. By probing gender indicators in the input text, we quantify the frequency differences of presentation-centric attributes. We propose an automatic method to estimate such differences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-07T18:52:22Z)
• How well can Text-to-Image Generative Models understand Ethical Natural Language Interventions? [67.97752431429865]
  We study the effect on the diversity of the generated images when adding ethical intervention. Preliminary studies indicate that a large change in the model predictions is triggered by certain phrases such as 'irrespective of gender'
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-27T07:32:39Z)
• The Tail Wagging the Dog: Dataset Construction Biases of Social Bias Benchmarks [75.58692290694452]
  We compare social biases with non-social biases stemming from choices made during dataset construction that might not even be discernible to the human eye. We observe that these shallow modifications have a surprising effect on the resulting degree of bias across various models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-18T17:58:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.