Optimal Sequential Decision-Making in Geosteering: A Reinforcement Learning Approach

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.04772v1
• Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2023 10:49:30 GMT
• Title: Optimal Sequential Decision-Making in Geosteering: A Reinforcement Learning Approach
• Authors: Ressi Bonti Muhammad, Sergey Alyaev, Reidar Brumer Bratvold
• Abstract summary: Trajectory adjustment decisions throughout the drilling process, called geosteering, affect subsequent choices and information gathering. We use the Deep Q-Network (DQN) method, a model-free reinforcement learning (RL) method that learns directly from the decision environment. For two previously published synthetic geosteering scenarios, our results show that RL achieves high-quality outcomes comparable to the quasi-optimal ADP.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Trajectory adjustment decisions throughout the drilling process, called geosteering, affect subsequent choices and information gathering, thus resulting in a coupled sequential decision problem. Previous works on applying decision optimization methods in geosteering rely on greedy optimization or Approximate Dynamic Programming (ADP). Either decision optimization method requires explicit uncertainty and objective function models, making developing decision optimization methods for complex and realistic geosteering environments challenging to impossible. We use the Deep Q-Network (DQN) method, a model-free reinforcement learning (RL) method that learns directly from the decision environment, to optimize geosteering decisions. The expensive computations for RL are handled during the offline training stage. Evaluating DQN needed for real-time decision support takes milliseconds and is faster than the traditional alternatives. Moreover, for two previously published synthetic geosteering scenarios, our results show that RL achieves high-quality outcomes comparable to the quasi-optimal ADP. Yet, the model-free nature of RL means that by replacing the training environment, we can extend it to problems where the solution to ADP is prohibitively expensive to compute. This flexibility will allow applying it to more complex environments and make hybrid versions trained with real data in the future.

Related papers

• Q-value Regularized Decision ConvFormer for Offline Reinforcement Learning [5.398202201395825]
  Decision Transformer (DT) has demonstrated exceptional capabilities in offline reinforcement learning. Decision ConvFormer (DC) is easier to understand in the context of modeling RL trajectories within a Markov Decision Process. We propose the Q-value Regularized Decision ConvFormer (QDC), which combines the understanding of RL trajectories by DC and incorporates a term that maximizes action values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-12T14:10:22Z)
• Learning Rate-Free Reinforcement Learning: A Case for Model Selection with Non-Stationary Objectives [22.06443176759265]
  We show that model selection can help to improve the failure modes of reinforcement learning algorithms. We present a model selection framework for Learning Rate-Free Reinforcement Learning that employs model selection methods to select the optimal learning rate on the fly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-07T18:55:58Z)
• Two-Stage ML-Guided Decision Rules for Sequential Decision Making under Uncertainty [55.06411438416805]
  Sequential Decision Making under Uncertainty (SDMU) is ubiquitous in many domains such as energy, finance, and supply chains. Some SDMU are naturally modeled as Multistage Problems (MSPs) but the resulting optimizations are notoriously challenging from a computational standpoint. This paper introduces a novel approach Two-Stage General Decision Rules (TS-GDR) to generalize the policy space beyond linear functions. The effectiveness of TS-GDR is demonstrated through an instantiation using Deep Recurrent Neural Networks named Two-Stage Deep Decision Rules (TS-LDR)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T18:19:47Z)
• Switchable Decision: Dynamic Neural Generation Networks [98.61113699324429]
  We propose a switchable decision to accelerate inference by dynamically assigning resources for each data instance. Our method benefits from less cost during inference while keeping the same accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T17:44:54Z)
• High-Precision Geosteering via Reinforcement Learning and Particle Filters [0.0]
  Geosteering is a key component of drilling operations and traditionally involves manual interpretation of various data sources such as well-log data. Academic attempts to solve geosteering decision optimization with greedy optimization and Approximate Dynamic Programming (ADP) showed promise but lacked adaptivity to realistic diverse scenarios. We propose Reinforcement learning (RL) to facilitate optimal decision-making through reward-based iterative learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-09T12:54:34Z)
• Data-Driven Offline Decision-Making via Invariant Representation Learning [97.49309949598505]
  offline data-driven decision-making involves synthesizing optimized decisions with no active interaction. A key challenge is distributional shift: when we optimize with respect to the input into a model trained from offline data, it is easy to produce an out-of-distribution (OOD) input that appears erroneously good. In this paper, we formulate offline data-driven decision-making as domain adaptation, where the goal is to make accurate predictions for the value of optimized decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-21T11:01:37Z)
• Learning MDPs from Features: Predict-Then-Optimize for Sequential Decision Problems by Reinforcement Learning [52.74071439183113]
  We study the predict-then-optimize framework in the context of sequential decision problems (formulated as MDPs) solved via reinforcement learning. Two significant computational challenges arise in applying decision-focused learning to MDPs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-06T23:53:31Z)
• Guided Constrained Policy Optimization for Dynamic Quadrupedal Robot Locomotion [78.46388769788405]
  We introduce guided constrained policy optimization (GCPO), an RL framework based upon our implementation of constrained policy optimization (CPPO) We show that guided constrained RL offers faster convergence close to the desired optimum resulting in an optimal, yet physically feasible, robotic control behavior without the need for precise reward function tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-22T10:15:53Z)
• Optimizing Wireless Systems Using Unsupervised and Reinforced-Unsupervised Deep Learning [96.01176486957226]
  Resource allocation and transceivers in wireless networks are usually designed by solving optimization problems. In this article, we introduce unsupervised and reinforced-unsupervised learning frameworks for solving both variable and functional optimization problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-03T11:01:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.