Information-Theoretic Bounds on The Removal of Attribute-Specific Bias From Neural Networks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.04955v2
• Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 17:57:45 GMT
• Title: Information-Theoretic Bounds on The Removal of Attribute-Specific Bias From Neural Networks
• Authors: Jiazhi Li, Mahyar Khayatkhoei, Jiageng Zhu, Hanchen Xie, Mohamed E. Hussein, Wael AbdAlmageed
• Abstract summary: We show that existing attribute bias removal methods are effective only when the inherent bias in the dataset is relatively weak. Our findings show that existing attribute bias removal methods are effective only when the inherent bias in the dataset is relatively weak.
• Score: 20.7209867191915
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Ensuring a neural network is not relying on protected attributes (e.g., race, sex, age) for predictions is crucial in advancing fair and trustworthy AI. While several promising methods for removing attribute bias in neural networks have been proposed, their limitations remain under-explored. In this work, we mathematically and empirically reveal an important limitation of attribute bias removal methods in presence of strong bias. Specifically, we derive a general non-vacuous information-theoretical upper bound on the performance of any attribute bias removal method in terms of the bias strength. We provide extensive experiments on synthetic, image, and census datasets to verify the theoretical bound and its consequences in practice. Our findings show that existing attribute bias removal methods are effective only when the inherent bias in the dataset is relatively weak, thus cautioning against the use of these methods in smaller datasets where strong attribute bias can occur, and advocating the need for methods that can overcome this limitation.

Related papers

• Debiasify: Self-Distillation for Unsupervised Bias Mitigation [19.813054813868476]
  Simplicity bias poses a significant challenge in neural networks, often leading models to favor simpler solutions and inadvertently learn decision rules influenced by spurious correlations. We introduce Debiasify, a novel self-distillation approach that requires no prior knowledge about the nature of biases. Our method leverages a new distillation loss to transfer knowledge within the network, from deeper layers containing complex, highly-predictive features to shallower layers with simpler, attribute-conditioned features in an unsupervised manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-01T16:25:05Z)
• SABAF: Removing Strong Attribute Bias from Neural Networks with Adversarial Filtering [20.7209867191915]
  We propose a new method for removing attribute bias in neural networks. The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art performance in both strong and moderate bias settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T08:13:55Z)
• Fast Model Debias with Machine Unlearning [54.32026474971696]
  Deep neural networks might behave in a biased manner in many real-world scenarios. Existing debiasing methods suffer from high costs in bias labeling or model re-training. We propose a fast model debiasing framework (FMD) which offers an efficient approach to identify, evaluate and remove biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T08:10:57Z)
• Causality and Independence Enhancement for Biased Node Classification [56.38828085943763]
  We propose a novel Causality and Independence Enhancement (CIE) framework, applicable to various graph neural networks (GNNs) Our approach estimates causal and spurious features at the node representation level and mitigates the influence of spurious correlations. Our approach CIE not only significantly enhances the performance of GNNs but outperforms state-of-the-art debiased node classification methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-14T13:56:24Z)
• Shielded Representations: Protecting Sensitive Attributes Through Iterative Gradient-Based Projection [39.16319169760823]
  Iterative Gradient-Based Projection is a novel method for removing non-linear encoded concepts from neural representations. Our results demonstrate that IGBP is effective in mitigating bias through intrinsic and extrinsic evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-17T13:26:57Z)
• Self-supervised debiasing using low rank regularization [59.84695042540525]
  Spurious correlations can cause strong biases in deep neural networks, impairing generalization ability. We propose a self-supervised debiasing framework potentially compatible with unlabeled samples. Remarkably, the proposed debiasing framework significantly improves the generalization performance of self-supervised learning baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-11T08:26:19Z)
• Unsupervised Learning of Unbiased Visual Representations [10.871587311621974]
  Deep neural networks are known for their inability to learn robust representations when biases exist in the dataset. We propose a fully unsupervised debiasing framework, consisting of three steps. We employ state-of-the-art supervised debiasing techniques to obtain an unbiased model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-26T10:51:50Z)
• Semi-FairVAE: Semi-supervised Fair Representation Learning with Adversarial Variational Autoencoder [92.67156911466397]
  We propose a semi-supervised fair representation learning approach based on adversarial variational autoencoder. We use a bias-aware model to capture inherent bias information on sensitive attribute. We also use a bias-free model to learn debiased fair representations by using adversarial learning to remove bias information from them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-01T15:57:47Z)
• The Interplay Between Implicit Bias and Benign Overfitting in Two-Layer Linear Networks [51.1848572349154]
  neural network models that perfectly fit noisy data can generalize well to unseen test data. We consider interpolating two-layer linear neural networks trained with gradient flow on the squared loss and derive bounds on the excess risk.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-25T22:01:01Z)
• Simon Says: Evaluating and Mitigating Bias in Pruned Neural Networks with Knowledge Distillation [8.238238958749134]
  A clear gap exists in the current literature on evaluating and mitigating bias in pruned neural networks. We propose two simple yet effective metrics, Combined Error Variance (CEV) and Symmetric Distance Error (SDE) to quantitatively evaluate the induced bias prevention quality. Second, we demonstrate that knowledge distillation can mitigate induced bias in pruned neural networks, even with unbalanced datasets. Third, we reveal that model similarity has strong correlations with pruning induced bias, which provides a powerful method to explain why bias occurs in pruned neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-15T02:59:32Z)
• Learning from Failure: Training Debiased Classifier from Biased Classifier [76.52804102765931]
  We show that neural networks learn to rely on spurious correlation only when it is "easier" to learn than the desired knowledge. We propose a failure-based debiasing scheme by training a pair of neural networks simultaneously. Our method significantly improves the training of the network against various types of biases in both synthetic and real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-06T07:20:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.