Towards Verifiable Generation: A Benchmark for Knowledge-aware Language Model Attribution
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.05634v2
- Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 04:51:35 GMT
- Title: Towards Verifiable Generation: A Benchmark for Knowledge-aware Language Model Attribution
- Authors: Xinze Li, Yixin Cao, Liangming Pan, Yubo Ma, Aixin Sun,
- Abstract summary: This paper defines a new task of Knowledge-aware Language Model Attribution (KaLMA)
First, we extend attribution source from unstructured texts to Knowledge Graph (KG), whose rich structures benefit both the attribution performance and working scenarios.
Second, we propose a new Conscious Incompetence" setting considering the incomplete knowledge repository.
Third, we propose a comprehensive automatic evaluation metric encompassing text quality, citation quality, and text citation alignment.
- Score: 48.86322922826514
- License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Abstract: Although achieving great success, Large Language Models (LLMs) usually suffer from unreliable hallucinations. Although language attribution can be a potential solution, there are no suitable benchmarks and evaluation metrics to attribute LLMs to structured knowledge. In this paper, we define a new task of Knowledge-aware Language Model Attribution (KaLMA) that improves upon three core concerns with conventional attributed LMs. First, we extend attribution source from unstructured texts to Knowledge Graph (KG), whose rich structures benefit both the attribution performance and working scenarios. Second, we propose a new ``Conscious Incompetence" setting considering the incomplete knowledge repository, where the model identifies the need for supporting knowledge beyond the provided KG. Third, we propose a comprehensive automatic evaluation metric encompassing text quality, citation quality, and text citation alignment. To implement the above innovations, we build a dataset in biography domain BioKaLMA via evolutionary question generation strategy, to control the question complexity and necessary knowledge to the answer. For evaluation, we develop a baseline solution and demonstrate the room for improvement in LLMs' citation generation, emphasizing the importance of incorporating the "Conscious Incompetence" setting, and the critical role of retrieval accuracy.
Related papers
- CoTKR: Chain-of-Thought Enhanced Knowledge Rewriting for Complex Knowledge Graph Question Answering [33.89497991289916]
We propose a novel rewriting method CoTKR, Chain-of-Thought Enhanced Knowledge Rewriting, for generating reasoning traces and corresponding knowledge in an interleaved manner.
We conduct experiments using various Large Language Models (LLMs) across several Knowledge Graph Question Answering (KGQA) benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-29T16:08:45Z) - Supportiveness-based Knowledge Rewriting for Retrieval-augmented Language Modeling [65.72918416258219]
Supportiveness-based Knowledge Rewriting (SKR) is a robust and pluggable knowledge rewriter inherently optimized for LLM generation.
Based on knowledge supportiveness, we first design a training data curation strategy for our rewriter model.
We then introduce the direct preference optimization (DPO) algorithm to align the generated rewrites to optimal supportiveness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-12T11:52:35Z) - A Knowledge-Injected Curriculum Pretraining Framework for Question Answering [70.13026036388794]
We propose a general Knowledge-Injected Curriculum Pretraining framework (KICP) to achieve comprehensive KG learning and exploitation for Knowledge-based question answering tasks.
The KI module first injects knowledge into the LM by generating KG-centered pretraining corpus, and generalizes the process into three key steps.
The KA module learns knowledge from the generated corpus with LM equipped with an adapter as well as keeps its original natural language understanding ability.
The CR module follows human reasoning patterns to construct three corpora with increasing difficulties of reasoning, and further trains the LM from easy to hard in a curriculum manner.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-11T03:42:03Z) - DIVKNOWQA: Assessing the Reasoning Ability of LLMs via Open-Domain
Question Answering over Knowledge Base and Text [73.68051228972024]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have exhibited impressive generation capabilities, but they suffer from hallucinations when relying on their internal knowledge.
Retrieval-augmented LLMs have emerged as a potential solution to ground LLMs in external knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-31T04:37:57Z) - Improving Open Information Extraction with Large Language Models: A
Study on Demonstration Uncertainty [52.72790059506241]
Open Information Extraction (OIE) task aims at extracting structured facts from unstructured text.
Despite the potential of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT as a general task solver, they lag behind state-of-the-art (supervised) methods in OIE tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-07T01:35:24Z) - KoLA: Carefully Benchmarking World Knowledge of Large Language Models [87.96683299084788]
We construct a Knowledge-oriented LLM Assessment benchmark (KoLA)
We mimic human cognition to form a four-level taxonomy of knowledge-related abilities, covering $19$ tasks.
We use both Wikipedia, a corpus prevalently pre-trained by LLMs, along with continuously collected emerging corpora, to evaluate the capacity to handle unseen data and evolving knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-15T17:20:46Z) - Structured Knowledge Grounding for Question Answering [0.23068481501673416]
We propose to leverage the language and knowledge for knowledge based question-answering with flexibility, breadth of coverage and structured reasoning.
Specifically, we devise a knowledge construction method that retrieves the relevant context with a dynamic hop.
And we devise a deep fusion mechanism to further bridge the information exchanging bottleneck between the language and the knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-17T08:48:50Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.